RevidgeBlue Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago As regards Vi's comments about Tyjon and Montgomery being viewed as first team squad players wouldn't people say that Leonard looks a better option at this point? (Not that either are satisfactory.) I suppose Leonard hasnt got Arsenal allegedly lined up waiting to pay Β£1m for him. 1 Quote
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
JHRover Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Ismael didn't need to say that Travis has asked to leave. He could simply have batted off questions and limited his talk to the dismal defeat to Bradford. As I said earlier, he's either an idiot and said it without thinking of the impact it could have on the player and fanbase, or he's complicit in the Regime's cover-up operation which has been gaining a lot of momentum the last few days. The Regime knows that eyes are on them and pressure is building. Turning the focus on 'wantaway' players and feeding Jackson sob stories about 'lifechanging' offers from Derby all part of that Β 6 1 Quote
islander200 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, M_B said: Don't agree, but there we have it.Β But what will you be saying if the replacements (if there actually is any) are more cheap foreign imports and it leads us to being relegated. When we start next campaign in League One will you be rubbing your hands together and saying well at least we got Β£2 million for our captain and 500k for our most experienced defender? Your point is valid at most clubs who would use the majority of these fees on replacements of a decent standard.We don't do that here 5 Quote
Paul Mellelieu Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Suspect VI is trying to pressure Derby by making the situation public. Β 1 Quote
Hasta Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 4 minutes ago, aletheia said: Jeeze, gobbledegook. Didnβt realise someone would quote me 20 seconds after I posted before I proof read it. Edited 5 hours ago by Hasta Quote
BankEnd Rover Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, JHRover said: Ismael didn't need to say that Travis has asked to leave. He could simply have batted off questions and limited his talk to the dismal defeat to Bradford. As I said earlier, he's either an idiot and said it without thinking of the impact it could have on the player and fanbase, or he's complicit in the Regime's cover-up operation which has been gaining a lot of momentum the last few days. The Regime knows that eyes are on them and pressure is building. Turning the focus on 'wantaway' players and feeding Jackson sob stories about 'lifechanging' offers from Derby all part of that Β In bold - 100% correct. Whatever reasons Val had, for me, it should not of been said.Β Β 3 Quote
M_B Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 4 minutes ago, roversfan99 said: His intentions are most likely that he is sat on a 3 year deal so not to rock the boat. Nothing sinister beyond that. He has shown signs of frustration already and he will be worn down at some point. They all have been. He's shown signs of frustration at historic failings. This is now where we find out if they're all on the same page going forward. It's the reason I've been saying for months that the most important thing at the club is that Ismael and Gestede are aligned in what's happening.Β Quote
Tyrone Shoelaces Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 3 hours ago, Paul Mellelieu said: I've been with the Venkys Out! faction side since the Kean fiasco. Iβve been Venkies out since they sacked Big Sam. They obviously had a death wish for the club even then. Β Β 2 1 Quote
M_B Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 4 minutes ago, islander200 said: But what will you be saying if the replacements (if there actually is any) are more cheap foreign imports and it leads us to being relegated. When we start next campaign in League One will you be rubbing your hands together and saying well at least we got Β£2 million for our captain and 500k for our most experienced defender? Your point is valid at most clubs who would use the majority of these fees on replacements of a decent standard.We don't do that here That's down to the recruitment department .Β Quote
Emerald Isle Rover Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 9 minutes ago, alexanders said: Donβt want to say I told you soβ¦β¦.but Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, JHRover said: Ismael didn't need to say that Travis has asked to leave. I agree.Β It's far from the first thing I'd be lining up to criticise VI for, I reckon he may well turn out to be one of our worst ever managers which is far more relevant. However If negotiations have been going on in private behind the scenes then for him to unilaterally announce this without the permission of the Travis camp then it's pretty poor form. Then of course, there's the possibility that Derby won't meet our valuation anyway in which case VI will have besmirched Travis's reputation in the eyes of the supporters for no good reason. It comes across as though he is acting to instruction and trying to ensure Travis leaves. 8 Quote
aletheia Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Hasta said: Didnβt realise someone would quote me 20 seconds after I posted before I proof read it Sorry, think I have misunderstood. I thought your post in quotation marks was VI -ie gobbledegook. Don't think there has been a post of yours I have disagreed with. π 1 Quote
Tyrone Shoelaces Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 25 minutes ago, islander200 said: How exactly has he thrown Travis under the bus ? He was asked a question and he answered it. What should have been his answer to the question over Travis answer to the Derby bid? Now if Travis didn't say he wanted to leave and Ismael was saying that to try push him out then that would be throwing him under the bus. But Travis does want out.Would you have preferred Ismael to say Travis wanted to stay and then he leaves before deadline? I agree. He was asked a straight question and he gave a straight answer. Thatβs not β throwing anybody under the busβ , itβs simply telling the truth. 4 Quote
Hasta Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, aletheia said: Sorry, think I have misunderstood. I thought your post in quotation marks was VI -ie gobbledegook. Don't think there has been a post of yours I have disagreed with. π Ok. Β No probs. I tend to post, then reread and correct and I thought you were criticising the unedited grammar / spelling.Β Quote
Emerald Isle Rover Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 2 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said: I agree.Β It's far from the first thing I'd be lining up to criticise VI for, I reckon he may well turn out to be one of our worst ever managers which is far more relevant. However If negotiations have been going on in private behind the scenes then for him to unilaterally announce this without the permission of the Travis camp then it's pretty poor form. Then of course, there's the possibility that Derby won't meet our valuation anyway in which case VI will have besmirched Travis's reputation in the eyes of the supporters for no good reason. It comes across as though he is acting to instruction and trying to ensure Travis leaves. How do we determine worst ever manager? Previously Iv been given excuses about managers because of injuries or lack of investment Surely val falls into the category of shafted by recruitmentΒ Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 8 minutes ago, M_B said: He's shown signs of frustration at historic failings. This is now where we find out if they're all on the same page going forward. It's the reason I've been saying for months that the most important thing at the club is that Ismael and Gestede are aligned in what's happening.Β If Gestede doesn't know what he is doing and/or is hell bent on a project that cannot possibly work, why is it important they're both aligned? 2 Quote
islander200 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 8 minutes ago, M_B said: He's shown signs of frustration at historic failings. This is now where we find out if they're all on the same page going forward. It's the reason I've been saying for months that the most important thing at the club is that Ismael and Gestede are aligned in what's happening.Β You keep saying this "historic failings" Was Gestede not in position all last year?Was Pasha not here? They chose to wait until the summer(Gestede said this)Β 4 Quote
aletheia Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Just now, islander200 said: He's shown signs of frustration at historic failings. This is now where we find out if they're all on the same page going forward. It's the reason I've been saying for months that the most important thing at the club is that Ismael and Gestede are aligned in what's happening.Β Beautiful spouting of club's new narrative. 2 Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, Emerald Isle Rover said: How do we determine worst ever manager? Previously Iv been given excuses about managers because of injuries or lack of investment Surely val falls into the category of shafted by recruitmentΒ I'll judge him purely on results. We've had plenty of other managers in the past who've had far less to work with. 2 Quote
M_B Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, RevidgeBlue said: If Gestede doesn't know what he is doing and/or is hell bent on a project that cannot possibly work, why is it important they're both aligned? Because whatever the plan may or may not be, it definitely won't work unless they are.Β Quote
USABlue Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 5 hours ago, RevidgeBlue said: Oh great. We aren't Sheffield Wednesday. Yippee. That said, their players showed a lot more heart and spirit against Leicester than we didΒ against West Brom. No we are not but the Venkies dream to be as soon as they can.Β Why donthey not just do one.Β It is onvious they have no interest in Rovers at all.Β Success is not required just the cheapest operating plan possible.Β I wish widespread Avian Flu on them.Β Shame to punish the chickens though.Β I hate em I really do.Β Do they hold meetings to figure out the best way to piss us off each season.Β Did they really just allow a team finishing 7th to be totally dismantled?Β Last january a good striker and one ir 2 others may well have seen a serious tip at the Prem, this lot?Β Nah let's give em nowt and then avoid it happening again.Β Hate em simply hate em.Β Re, Sheff Wed even with the problems their talisman and captain re-upped and is staying whereas ours just wants out, full stop. Edited 5 hours ago by USABlue Quote
islander200 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Just now, aletheia said: Beautiful spouting of club's new narrative. That's not me who is saying that no idea why my username is quoted as saying itΒ Quote
M_B Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, aletheia said: Beautiful spouting of club's new narrative. No narrative, it's just common sense.Β Quote
rigger Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Tyrone Shoelaces said: I agree. He was asked a straight question and he gave a straight answer. Thatβs not β throwing anybody under the busβ , itβs simply telling the truth. Telling the truth is such an odd concept for the Venky Rovers. Probably why people are suspicious. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.