Jump to content
Site Appearance ×

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, smiller14 said:

Again, I'm conscious I've said a lot without really saying anything, which shows I haven't really made my own mind up on a lot of the above! 

Yeah, but no, but yeah.  😉

(But that's how life is, complicated and good post.)

 

Posted
1 hour ago, smiller14 said:

Is this based on anything specific or just a hunch? No obligation to answer.

I know the much discussed BRFC Privy is almost certainly a club employee but they tend to post only when things are done and the person discussed above departed before BRFC Privy's rise to Twitter prominence (I think!). 

I've heard bits that have originated from her previously (indirectly, I've never spoke to her in my life). 

Definitely nothing to do with that BRFC privy account no.

Posted
2 hours ago, RevidgeBlue said:

If you put your finger where the like button used to be you can still react to stuff I've now found!

Ta, get you all technical. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Herbie6590 said:

We have a problem on a specific page which @StubbsUK is trying to resolve 👍

For info.

Accept/Reject Cookies button not working.

Adverts are permanently on and blocking out 1/2 the phone's screen.

Vote up/down button there but not visible.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Eldirk said:

Please god, no.

Would take him on a free for a few reasons.

 

Championship experience - lacking that at the moment. 
 

1 in just under 4 for Leeds. That’s about 11 goals extra for us which we will need.

 

Offers something different to Ohashi and Gueye

  • Disagree 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, Ruaney said:

Would take him on a free for a few reasons.

 

Championship experience - lacking that at the moment. 
 

1 in just under 4 for Leeds. That’s about 11 goals extra for us which we will need.

 

Offers something different to Ohashi and Gueye

I wouldn't touch him with yours.

Posted
16 minutes ago, Ruaney said:

Would take him on a free for a few reasons.

 

Championship experience - lacking that at the moment. 
 

1 in just under 4 for Leeds. That’s about 11 goals extra for us which we will need.

 

Offers something different to Ohashi and Gueye

He’s made of glass though, I doubt we’d get more than 20 games out of him. Best to leave alone. 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Eldirk said:

He’s made of glass though, I doubt we’d get more than 20 games out of him. Best to leave alone. 

Don’t worry he won’t come, the club pay crap wages that I doubt he’d accept anyway 

Posted
5 hours ago, roversfan99 said:

It will be interesting to see what Ismael says tomorrow. His consistent comments for 2 or 3 weeks were 1 more (a winger) and then replacements for outgoings.

Since then, Baradji has come in (injured) and Travis has gone. Obviously that winger turned out to be Morishita, and Buckley has also gone although he wasnt in the first team picture anyway.

A midfielder based on that logic would potentially fit into what Ismael was saying, although Buckley they might argue was not in the picture and doesnt need replacing, although Travis' replacement is injured. So who knows.

Unless something has changed. We wanted a striker at the start of the summer, so the only explanation would be that the fees for Travis and Buckley have opened something up.

I am not convinced that is certain that we will do more business.

I can see us signing 2 or 3 before the window shuts, it will be interesting to see what Ismael but with the window closing in less than 96 hours we need to be getting them into the UK Saturday/Sunday at the latest to get it all done by Monday. 

  • Disagree 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

I can see us signing 2 or 3 before the window shuts, it will be interesting to see what Ismael but with the window closing in less than 96 hours we need to be getting them into the UK Saturday/Sunday at the latest to get it all done by Monday. 

1 at best i feel.

Certainly can't see 3 coming in.

Posted
6 hours ago, aletheia said:

Yes indeed. You never felt like it would really happen.

What is interesting to me is that the new narrative is that some of those players were responsible, tired old faces who never quite got it done. There may be truth there but I find it harsh. Those same players (and respective managers) just needed some more backing. It will run and run.

But the new orthodoxy in town has for now taken hold. Only a run of bad results will shift it and even then there will be plenty of voices around to step in and provide excuses. 🙂

 

Sounds like you wouldn’t be too unhappy with “ a run of bad results “ ?  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.