This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Tyrone Shoelaces Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 1 hour ago, roverblue said: There is an article on the LET today where Ismael basically says he hasn't been good enough so far and was dropped from the match day squad... https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/25517874.blackburn-rovers-boss-reveals-reason-tavares-absence/ You could add pretty much put all the signings in that bucket other than the defensive ones in my opinion. I like Ismael’s attitude there. At the least he tells it like it is. 4 Quote
Trinidad Rover Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago (edited) Believe by our standards we spent 'decent' money on Tavares. So far proving to be what most expected, crap. This will not go down well with our resident dictators. Expect Gestede is fuming and currently thinking up an excuse/blaming the Telegraph and fans for being mean. Edited 9 hours ago by Trinidad Rover 1 Quote
Dreams of 1995 Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Tavares looks like a tidy player on the ball but he's clearly used to a different pace. He's far too nonchalant and looks to be a victim of the youth academies mentality of "not worrying if you lose it when trying to play the right way" That luxury ends in senior football. Perhaps he needs reminding of it. There's a time and a place to be cute; there's a time and a place to play tight and safe. If Tavares can master that, then there's a decent player in there 5 Quote
because of boxing day Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago At the moment he looks like a Buckley Mk2 needing a little too much time on the ball before progressing play but I agree that there is a player in there if he adapts to a quicker game pace in the regular congested midfield battleground. Not sure that our midfield would be sufficiently robust for the typical Championship midfield battles with both Tavares and Cantwell in the starting eleven. Quote
metalrover Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) Tavares replacement for Travis is a massive gamble, which has so far backfired miserably. The sheer numbers of cheap unknown signings from foreign leagues lower divisions replacing proven 1st team players is clear evidence of their transfer policy having zero ambition or any regards to risking the club's Championship status. Edited 6 hours ago by metalrover 2 Quote
den Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Selling quality players and replacing them with cheap gambles is what they did when they took over a mid table Premier league side. That relegated us and with the very odd signing it’s what they’ve been doing for 15 years now. They aren’t going to change. For the fans that know we can and have done better than that, it’s a killer. 1 Quote
neophox Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) This is exactly what he needs. A kick on the arse, its time to start produce. We hade the same with some players under JDT who was left out to play with the u21s then coming back stronger. Edited 6 hours ago by neophox Quote
Hasta Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago It's a good job we got Gardner-Hickman done on deadline day. I'm not saying he's been good, but at least it gave us a viable alternative to Tavares who we knew could perform to a certain level (League One / Bottom Championship). Jake Garrett seriously comes under consideration for the bench once he's back, which is something last year you'd have scoffed at. Quote
Tomphil2 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Is Garret even getting any games on loan ? Seems our super academy conveyor belt has come to a grinding halt judging by those who've been sent out to get mins not getting many. Quote
chaddyrovers Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 10 minutes ago, Tomphil2 said: Is Garret even getting any games on loan ? Seems our super academy conveyor belt has come to a grinding halt judging by those who've been sent out to get mins not getting many. He's injured not loan anywhere Quote
Tomphil2 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 18 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said: He's injured not loan anywhere Care to comment on the ones that are ? Quote
chaddyrovers Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 9 minutes ago, Tomphil2 said: Care to comment on the ones that are ? On the players that out on loan? Centre back O'Riordan is doing well from reports. On the others, dont know. Maybe @KentExilecould add more to this Quote
KentExile Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 31 minutes ago, Tomphil2 said: Care to comment on the ones that are ? 19 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said: On the players that out on loan? Centre back O'Riordan is doing well from reports. On the others, dont know. Maybe @KentExilecould add more to this The loan moves out seem to have been badly chosen (mores than previously) in the main this season O'Riordan has been a success, he missed the weekends game with an ankle injury, apparently he was touch and go, so shouldn't be out for long Edmondson has been doing well at Macclesfield, quite possibly he may get a loan to a 5th tier team in January, I would say or 4th tier, but think that Rovers may be scared of doing so based on what has happened to the rest of our loanees this season Pratt has just has his initial loan extended by a month by Chorley, although he has not played a lot for them, seems to be on the bench more often than not. As far as i remember,. this was the only loan which was started or extended following Jordan Rhodes being appointed as loan manager (I would have expected a lot more, last season we sent out a huge amount of players on short term loans, and expected similar to happen again) Barrett warms the bench for Tranmere, although may play this week in the EFL cup Olson & O'Grady-Macken can't even get on the Oldham bench in League games, although they may feature in the EFL cup this week Garrett is injured rather than out on loan Duru doesn't get on the bench in the USA, and apparently has a "questionable lower body injury", whatever that means Edited 1 hour ago by KentExile 1 Quote
joey_big_nose Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 7 hours ago, because of boxing day said: At the moment he looks like a Buckley Mk2 needing a little too much time on the ball before progressing play but I agree that there is a player in there if he adapts to a quicker game pace in the regular congested midfield battleground. Not sure that our midfield would be sufficiently robust for the typical Championship midfield battles with both Tavares and Cantwell in the starting eleven. Personally I think he is a long way behind Buckley at the moment. I am struggling to see how even if he gets up to pace of English football he will be much better than Buckley. Quote
roversfan99 Posted 29 minutes ago Posted 29 minutes ago And to think after the home defeat to League 1 Bradford, we had one or two saying how we had likely found an upgrade on Travis. Quote
Hasta Posted 21 minutes ago Posted 21 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Tomphil2 said: Is Garret even getting any games on loan ? Seems our super academy conveyor belt has come to a grinding halt judging by those who've been sent out to get mins not getting many. As he was injured he didn’t go out on loan. Meaning he’s still here. And last week the Rovers website , when stating Baradji was a “longer term” absentee stated that the under 21 game on Friday would come “too soon” for Carter and Garrett. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.