Gestede is head of football operations at Rovers basically a Director of football role.

Park left cos of Eustace interference in recruitment from what been posted on here. Was it odd choice? I mentioned Ismael and Wagner names as soon as Eustace cos they were head coaches who have worked in DoF/head coach structure and I also said I expected foreign head coach appointment

No a head coach who fits into the structure and will accept the recruitment staff recommendations. I always thought Ismael appointment wasn't a Waggott one. More of Gestede and Owen. All 4 of them(Waggott, Pasha, Gestede and Owen) all interviewing candidates and I read They went to interviewed candidates in London before the Swansea game. Wagner and Ismael were the final candidates.

It's should be our own Rovers TV, Radio Lancs with Andy Bayes, LT with Elliott Jackson and Sky Sports news. Different people Different sources of media, not everyone listen to Radio Lancs or has X.

choice of who tho? choices? who were these? any chance you name some if not all? I am always willing to accept my mistakes and apologise

communicating with your supporters should have been priority over recent weeks but even last summer when GB and IS left and why we made the appointments we did, but nothing again Its not just this season, its been poor but for a number of years. The entire club need to be more media friendly and do things in a different way whether more behind the scenes videos or more interviews with different people at the club. Take the Eustace situation, when the approach for Eustace came in and supposedly that was made on Friday night, Rovers club management should have bringing Eustace in the office and sorting it out before the Wolves FA cup game. If I was in charge and Eustace wanted out, I would have removed him from taking the team along with Downing and Gardiner whilst placing Lowe and Johnson in charge of the team until a new head coach appointment was made. Its was madness to allow this situation to continue over the weekend and even Monday. Plus we had a game on Wednesday night and we didn't have a clue who was in team until around 2 hours before kick off. Utter madness commination with your supporters and those attending that WBA game

I researched into the tactics he used at both clubs, results but getting Watford's league position was a genuine mistake. I can say my words were harsh and unfair towards yourself So who was original choice as you suggested before that choice was ignored given no journalist who were suggested who was being or had been interviewed or this original choice was ignore? why he get the job he did then

would be very surprised if they say out but supposedly they are interviews tomorrow. Should have been doing all this interviews weeks ago. Its a bit rich saying that now given you aren't buying one for next season, but you backed this regime for years by buying one using your own words.

should have been done weeks ago. Gestede or Waggott should have been speaking publicly after Eustace wanting to go Derby and after that was confirmed, They should be proactive but yet they didn't. The club should be more media friendly and more open with supporters. When Ismael was appointed, Gestede and Waggott should be out there stating why Ismael was selected and why he was the right fit.

Or Maybe Rovers were looking for a different head coach and a head coach who will listen and accept the recruitment team who suggested signings and not come up with their own sgnings did we? what happens if that gone the same way, your opinion would be the other way. rising star? very few fit this type of appointment and we seen Stoke try this and went nowhere or Joe Edwards at Millwall or do we take risk on a head coach in league 1 or 2 and what would happens if all went pear shape, you would here criticising them for that, so tbh the club could do nothing right unless they appoint a Warnock or Allardyce who you wanted despite Warnock being 76 years old and Allardyce being 70 years old.

I think some of your comments have been unfair and nothing to back it up like Forshaw has to play which hasn't bare out there. who was the original choice given both Alan Nixon and Elliott Jackson have reported, so can you name him?

I know all the stats about that. I researched into that and I don't agree league position is irrelevant oki doki then

Its not been a week yet since they went on sales. I haven't renew yet but I will be doing before the deadline happens

Well well. I gave my opinion on Gestede's appointment in the summer and possible appointment as CEO. not in favour. But I respect other people who have the opposite view. Pot kettle black. Just pointless posts or calling on us getting games postpone and falling to understand that will be criminal record which lots of people need for their job Bravo bravo

Wrong here. Never said it was good appointment did I. Look at my answers to MattyBlue. Might save me repeating it Wrong again. Never praised the appointment. Try reading what was said not what you want to read. Might help you

Or doing their best to develop their young players before bringing them into their first team or selling them

Generally we are awaiting weeks if not months for replacement for key positions. Also I haven't said I agree with who they have appoint. Key difference here.

He started one game and do the bigger clubs not interfere when they say a player must player regular or play so many minutes

Why did you think That anyway? I wasn't keen on his appointment as head of football operations if you remember. I thought we need more experience appointment. Someone who had done that role before.

Communication wise is been very poor for years after years. Gestede said improving communication to the fans when appointed. Yet that hasn't happened. No end of transfer window interview, no interview when Eustace left or Ismael was appointed. Very poor. Just to add communication to your supporters and explaining where you make key decision like signing or appointment of head coach or key position at the club.

No

No Wrong, I just dont to keep going this same old point so just accept other people view point to save the hassle sadly some of you always want to be right. I just can't be assed with this argument again

Or this was plan from the summer why Waggott stayed on for a year and let Gestede get appointed into a different role and bit by bit learning and maybe even doing some of the work would be doing. Didn't someone said on here Gestede had an interview plan for Tuesday. Wonder if this was the story and when announcement would be made

Tronstad had just come back from injury thst week after 2 months so of course you wouldn't rush him back. Hence why Forshaw played. Of course Forshaw was signed as cheap squad player and said at the time. Yes we know about what went on in that era and fans suggested players to management. Crazy times and situation. If the club needs criticising I will do when appropriate not at the willing or pressure from others. I criticised the ST Prices for next season, was completely against selling the STC and just based on one site. Yes I would be for a new training complex being built if it was improving the facilities and standards but it wasn't and where are you building it. Most areas are taken by house building or businesses building. So we should stay were we are and improve that site and academy site

Good for you. Ismael had a pathetic record in his last 2 jobs? Don't agree. WBA were in the playoffs when he was sacked and Watford were 9th when sacked. Pathetic record? Not for me. More than decent enough. Ismael and Wagner were the final 2 candidates from reports, and I both of the would be the sort of options Rovers would look at instead of British head coach. Who says any team selected by Ismael has been interfere with?.who the source?