Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

jim mk2

Members
  • Posts

    23503
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    64

Everything posted by jim mk2

  1. The past is the past. In the present Tomasson is taking us down . What was working is no longer working. And he doesn’t show any sign of turning it round. On results alone he has to go
  2. When his football worked it was lovely to watch, some of the best I've seen Rovers play, But dear oh dear, he hadn't a clue how to set us up to do the hard yards, the backs to the wall stuff that you need when things aren't going well.
  3. ..... To start with, Eustace was quite negative with his play as Birmingham relied on long-ball football and set pieces a little. As time progressed, though, there was more of a possession focus" Sounds like a pragmatist compared to Tomasson's idealistic approach His first job would be to sort out the Rovers defence and stop us conceding soft goals from set pieces
  4. Don't get this, sorry. As it stands, Tomasson is taking us down to League One and shows no sign of knowing how to stop the slide. He's had a rough deal at Ewood but he has to go. We'll soon find out if his successor is worse but if Eustace or whoever saves us from relegation he isn't a downgrade
  5. Dearie me, a young loanee who's only been here a short time dragged out to plea for unity. Is that the best Maggott could do?
  6. Maggott is very crafty. Rule No 1 for bosses under fire: surround yourself with friends and people you know Eustace fits the bill perfectly Not saying he wouldn't be a bad appointment, but it's all very convenient
  7. Maggott & Mowbray|: Coventry connection Maggott & Eustace: Coventry connection The old boys' network alive and well in football If Maggott could get Mark Robins instead I guess he might even earn a few Brownie points on here Have to say I don't know much about Eustace except he was well regarded at Brum and clearly didn't deserve to be sacked Roll the dice. Here we go again
  8. Mark Hughes is a strange one, a brilliant manager for Rovers yet failed just about everywhere else, most recently at Bradford. Odd
  9. Possibly but he’s the absent elephant in the room. I don’t see how they could have a discussion of that nature without the manager’s name coming up
  10. I assume the part in black type was about Tomasson and his impending departure. You can understand why it should not be revealed on here
  11. No surprise that the players want to see more fans in the ground. But it’s in their hands to start winning matches and give fans something to cheer about I’m fed up with the excuses for Tomasson and claims that he doesn’t deserve this. He’s a failing manager who is leading the club towards relegation. His resignation offer should be accepted forthwith
  12. Oliver Kay is a former Times football writer. Big name, good contacts. You'd hope he might provide some insight
  13. The conclusion has to be that Venky's don't want promotion. Our 2 big chances to go up in recent seasons, under Mowbray and Tomasson, and the funding was never there to give us that final push into the playoffs. I think it suits them for Rovers to be out of the top flight, where the glare of publicity and worldwide attention that the Premier League receives would cast a spotlight on the owners and their "activities". I still maintain Rovers as a club have for the past decade been used as a money laundering (tax dodging) vehicle by Venkys
  14. That would be ironic and it's a delicious thought, I'd love him back. I think he's enjoying counting his millions at Casa St James's though
  15. I know, he's just joined Aberdeen...... that's why I said it was a matter of days
  16. It's more of a fire fighting exercise than a fresh start. We're in a relegation battle here. If we somehow survive the summer will be the time for a complete revamp. Without any money of course
  17. And for the about the third occasion the timing is wrong to get Neil Warnock in and sort out the mess, this time by a matter of days.
  18. Tomasson's position is/was untenable. He's been undermined because the "project" has changed, and he's been told lies by the managemernt. And results have been dire, sackable. . Either way, he should leave the club
  19. I thin it's more likely she doesn't want to spend any more money and is seeking to recoup some of the losses built up over the years. Sadly, the Wharton deal might have given her encouragement to hang on in the hope of selling other assets.
  20. Would you also on something this important (and bearing in mind previous mistakes) back it up with a phone call to the league just to make sure it has arrived? I'm assuming the league is contactable on important days like the last day of a transfer window. We do it in business and at a personal level with very important things. Checking up and a belts and braces approach is never wrong
  21. Can someone explain the difference between the two? Cheston does the plus column and Hasan does the minus column? Same with head coach and director of football: two people doing the job of one And the club is supposed to be short of money
  22. Memo from the Ewood board: All staff to attend IT refresher course on Friday item 1: how to use the send button The is beyond parade now. Or they’re telling lies again
  23. We were on the pitch protesting against the board more than 50 years ago. Good luck with your WhatsApp discussion
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.