SIMON GARNERS 194 Posted June 24 Posted June 24 52 minutes ago, damo100 said: That money is for staff wages and the club, not transfers Yep,just about keeps the Ewood lights on. Quote
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Moderation Lead K-Hod Posted June 24 Moderation Lead Posted June 24 54 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said: Perhaps we should do @K-Hodย a list to take to the next fansโ forum ๐๐ Iโll make a start (and apologise for going so off topic at the same time ๐๐ ย Was the overdraft facility renewed in May and if so were the terms at least as favourable as before? Can you confirm that the owners now only have to return to court toย send monies if theyโre also seeking to vary the conditionย placed upon them to do so? During the period of the investigation, have the owners ever sought permission (either through the courts or directly with the Directorate of Enforcement) to send player purchase funds? (and if not, why not?) ย Please don't! A collaborative PM is fine.ย ๐. Quote
wilsdenrover Posted June 24 Posted June 24 (edited) 1 minute ago, K-Hod said: Please don't! A collaborative PM is fine.ย ๐. Too late ๐ - donโt you dare hit the hide button ๐๐ Edited June 24 by wilsdenrover Quote
Ricceh Posted June 24 Posted June 24 A couple of articles today linking Coventry with a move for Travis, but it's surely shit as Grimes, Torp and Sheaf did an excellent job for them last season? Quote
Leonard Venkhater Posted June 24 Posted June 24 Just now, Ricceh said: A couple of articles today linking Coventry with a move for Travis, but it's surely shit as Grimes, Torp and Sheaf did an excellent job for them last season? His agent is busy, busy.... 3 Quote
davulsukur Posted June 24 Posted June 24 Jake Batty is in the latest training photos (as spotted by Elliott Jackson), maybe he's signing up to a new contract Quote
Forever Blue Posted June 24 Posted June 24 https://x.com/roversxtra/status/1937504751014543484?s=46&t=akslDLyCum6MgJSQBIJ-Sg Rovers linked with Mohamed Guindoย Quote
rob_of_the_rovers Posted June 24 Posted June 24 1 hour ago, wilsdenrover said: Additional court conditionsโฆ The clubโs auditors have to provide a certificate confirming the use of the funds. Venkateshwara Hatcheries have to submit bank statements for both Venkys London and BRFC to substantiate the use (and final destination) of the funds.ย But doesn't using these new funds to cover running costs then free up the funds that would have been used on running costs to be used elsewhere, such as transfers? Quote
wilsdenrover Posted June 24 Posted June 24 12 minutes ago, rob_of_the_rovers said: But doesn't using these new funds to cover running costs then free up the funds that would have been used on running costs to be used elsewhere, such as transfers? Potentially - opinions may differ on whether this will actually happen. Quote
bluebruce Posted June 24 Posted June 24 2 hours ago, wilsdenrover said: ยฃ4.85 million for one quarter x 4 = very close to the much vaunted ยฃ20 million a year ๐ค๐ง Thought they sent money about twice a year and thought I'd heard figures of about 8 mill previouslyย Quote
Ricceh Posted June 24 Posted June 24 56 minutes ago, Forever Blue said: https://x.com/roversxtra/status/1937504751014543484?s=46&t=akslDLyCum6MgJSQBIJ-Sg Rovers linked with Mohamed Guindoย There are clubs with european football in the mix, he'd never agree to terms here Quote
Ricceh Posted June 24 Posted June 24 1 minute ago, Tugayisgod said: Considering he stepped in and did a (i think) decent job when the club pissed off JE, this is a shame. Quote
bluebruce Posted June 24 Posted June 24 2 hours ago, rob_of_the_rovers said: How do they even police that the money can't be spent on transfer fees? Are we just not allowed to spend any money on transfers now? Or do we have to prove that we already had some money set aside for transfers and we cannot exceed that?ย I would think that those exact funds have to be spent on whatever is specified, and a money trail provided...but that it frees up other funds that would have had to go to that. We have spent a couple of undisclosed fees this window, and other fees during this shenanigans, so we clearly aren't banned from spending on players. Quote
paullarrygher Posted June 24 Posted June 24 Wasn't there a rumour a while back that David Lowe provides updates to the owners on how the squad etc is doing? Maybe someone wanted him cut out of the loop. 1 Quote
bluebruce Posted June 24 Posted June 24 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Tugayisgod said: Interesting. I think a couple of years ago this would have been seen as a big positive (on here anyway), but now he has filled in and done a reasonable job as caretaker it probably isn't going to be as popular. He used to be widely considered untouchable. I wonder what changed, or if he ever was untouchable after all rather than just lucky and good enough at his job to be kept around. Edited June 24 by bluebruce Quote
Backroom Mike E Posted June 24 Backroom Posted June 24 3 minutes ago, Ricceh said: Considering he stepped in and did a (i think) decent job when the club pissed off JE, this is a shame. Disagree entirely. Lowe getting out is a HUGE positive. Rumours he was fired and rehired in a shady way around the time Lambert was around. 7 Quote
Ricceh Posted June 24 Posted June 24 Just now, Mike E said: Disagree entirely. Lowe getting out is a HUGE positive. Rumours he was fired and rehired in a shady way around the time Lambert was around. Fair enough, I don't know anything about shady firings and hirings. My recent view was he seemed like a positive influence on the team in a time where players were thrown into a bad situation. 2 Quote
Forever Blue Posted June 24 Posted June 24 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Tugayisgod said: Maybe Lowe was Waggottโs man on the training ground, rather than Venkyโs man on the inside? Itโs always interesting to see who else ย loses their job when a Senior figure departs an organisation.ย Regardless, itโs the Rudy/Pasha show now. Edited June 24 by Forever Blue Quote
davulsukur Posted June 24 Posted June 24 23 minutes ago, Tugayisgod said: This bloke has been borderline unsackable for years, so this is quite a surprise. 4 minutes ago, Forever Blue said: Maybe Lowe was Waggottโs man on the training ground, rather than Venkyโs man on the inside? Itโs always interesting to see who else ย loses their job when a Senior figure departs an organisation.ย Regardless, itโs the Rudy/Pasha show now. This seems like the most plausible reason as to why he stuck around for so long, when managers and assistants came and went. Quote
Rochdale_rover Posted June 24 Posted June 24 9 hours ago, RevidgeBlue said: If Dolan is "bang average" what does that make Hedges? Shite 6 Quote
Emerald Isle Rover Posted June 24 Posted June 24 Can someone elaborate on the rumours about Lowe being an inside man? Never heard these before but now 3/4 comments on here and on x first Iv read/heard of itย Quote
simongarnerisgod Posted June 24 Posted June 24 1 hour ago, paullarrygher said: Wasn't there a rumour a while back that David Lowe provides updates to the owners on how the squad etc is doing? Maybe someone wanted him cut out of the loop. eustace moved him out of the 1st team organisation completely,he stuck him inย the scouting dept,looks like val has put the final nail in lowe,just need to get rid of benson next Quote
Forever Blue Posted June 24 Posted June 24 31 minutes ago, Emerald Isle Rover said: Can someone elaborate on the rumours about Lowe being an inside man? Never heard these before but now 3/4 comments on here and on x first Iv read/heard of itย Just replied to an interesting thread that was started a couple of months back. Inside Rovers - think it started there 1 Quote
lraC Posted June 24 Posted June 24 42 minutes ago, Emerald Isle Rover said: Can someone elaborate on the rumours about Lowe being an inside man? Never heard these before but now 3/4 comments on here and on x first Iv read/heard of itย It was suggested that Lowe was once sacked and he went to the owners and was reinstated. As forever Blue mentioned the Twitter account Rovers insider has suggested he is unsackable and did have a direct line to the owners. It would seem to be a big deal, if he does get moved on. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.