January Transfer Needs

[rovers11]

O'Riordan will be coming back which I think is a sensible decision as he's been one of the best defenders in lge 1 this season. 

I'd scrub off a RB from the list as Litherland is more than a capable deputy for Alebiosu. Miller and TGH can also cover there. We need to squeeze as much out of our budget as possible.

CD, two attackers, and CM are the priority. Surely they have to be experienced players who are ready to make an impact from day one.

Gueye will definitely go, probably Pickering too. Tyjon likely as he's clearly not signing a new contract here so may as well get rid.

[KentExile]

1 minute ago, simongarnerisgod said:

there is no way lyndon dykes is taking a pay cut to come here,he would improve our set pieces though,guaranteed to get his head on them

Was just about to mention his alleged wage of somewhere between £15K & £20K/week

[Tyrone Shoelaces]

4 minutes ago, KentExile said:

or he has scored 7 in 54 for Birmingham, which included a year playing for possibly the best funded League 1 team in history who walked the league at a canter.  add to that he is now in his 30s, the signs point to a decline on what was not a prolific record in the first place

Dyke’s a blunt instrument. Gudjohnsen has his faults but when it comes to converting chances into goals he’s pretty good. Not many would have put that cross at Preston away and made it look easy peasy.

[chaddyrovers]

5 minutes ago, KentExile said:

or he has scored 7 in 54 for Birmingham, which included a year playing for possibly the best funded League 1 team in history who walked the league at a canter.  add to that he is now in his 30s, the signs point to a decline on what was not a prolific record in the first place

and how many games have he actually started? 

Birmingham signed a striker for £8m which was over half of their transfer spent and he has zero games. Dykes has 2. 

It was just a suggestion that's all guys 

[MarkBRFC]

2 minutes ago, rovers11 said:

O'Riordan will be coming back which I think is a sensible decision as he's been one of the best defenders in lge 1 this season. 

Has he though?

Didn't realise they have only won 1 out of there last 15 league games.

[Tyrone Shoelaces]

We need somebody who’s more like Gudjohnsen than Dykes. Somebody who’s more of a poacher than a grafter. We’ve got Ohashi to do the spadework. It’s a shame Gudjohnsen has got injured, they were looking to have formed a good partnership. It’s not  easy making signings when we’re down to our last magic bean. Oh to have the money we wasted on Gallagher and Brererton again. That’d buy you a good player at this level even now. I wonder what Southampton would want for Alan Armstrong ?

[Emerald Isle Rover]

6 minutes ago, MarkBRFC said:

Has he though?

Didn't realise they have only won 1 out of there last 15 league games.

You can still be a very good performer in a underperforming/poor team

[KentExile]

2 hours ago, MarkBRFC said:

Has he though?

Didn't realise they have only won 1 out of there last 15 league games.

Doncaster's manager (& fans on their forum) gave fairly scathing reports of their loanees, with the exception of O'Riordan, who was singled out for praise

I wonder just how outstanding/exceptional a defender has been, in a team who has won once since the beginning of September & who sit second bottom in the table, but he will probably do an adequate job as cover for Miller

 

Edited 2 hours ago by KentExile

[DE.]

7 minutes ago, Tyrone Shoelaces said:

We need somebody who’s more like Gudjohnsen than Dykes. Somebody who’s more of a poacher than a grafter. We’ve got Ohashi to do the spadework. It’s a shame Gudjohnsen has got injured, they were looking to have formed a good partnership. It’s not  easy making signings when we’re down to our last magic bean. Oh to have the money we wasted on Gallagher and Brererton again. That’d buy you a good player at this level even now. I wonder what Southampton would want for Alan Armstrong ?

Think he's on about £60k a week, so even if they have him away for free he'd have to accept a brutal pay cut to return here. Granted he might have had a wage reduction after relegation, but even so, well out of our price range! 

Edited 4 hours ago by DE.

[Tyrone Shoelaces]

1 minute ago, DE. said:

Think he's on about £60k a week, so even if they have him away for free he'd have to accept a brutal pay cut to return here. 

That’s a non starter then.

[KentExile]

12 minutes ago, Tyrone Shoelaces said:

We need somebody who’s more like Gudjohnsen than Dykes. Somebody who’s more of a poacher than a grafter. We’ve got Ohashi to do the spadework. It’s a shame Gudjohnsen has got injured, they were looking to have formed a good partnership. It’s not  easy making signings when we’re down to our last magic bean. Oh to have the money we wasted on Gallagher and Brererton again. That’d buy you a good player at this level even now. I wonder what Southampton would want for Alan Armstrong ?

Agree with most that post, but if you mean Adam Armstrong, he would be well outside of our budget

[roversfan99]

36 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Gudjohnsen stays centre of the pitch, has decent link up play, whilst Ohashi looks to run the channels. I think Dykes could play a similar role to Gudjohnsen. 

Dykes roughly average 1 goal every 4.5 games at QPR so that's 10 goals a season. If he could come in a get 5 goals within 15 games period then I would be be happy. 

Everytime with yourself, you are so quick to slagged off and moan about people's suggestions whilst coming up with none of your own and when asked, we get the standard line, I'm not a scout, i don't know on fees involved but I will continue to moan at others for their suggestions. 

Nothing patronising in my post but yet again, just posted the same old comments from you. You didn't read my comments and you misunderstood who does the transfer negotiations otherwise you wouldn't have posted what you did. 

No-one comment about its well structure or harmonious but you throw these comments in for some unknown reasons 

Gudjohnsen and Dykes might play in similar areas but the main difference is the most important. Gudjohnsen seems to have a knack of scoring goals. Dykes certainly doesnt.

I am not in a position to find and know enough about my own transfer suggestions. But I do know Lyndon Dykes enough to know that hes a bit of a donkey. I think Hardie as a suggestion has more merit to it. Mind you, its a pretty depressing thought that the 4th/5th/6th choice strikers at promoted teams are almost certainly unobtainable (certainly without wage contributions) to us, a side who finished 7th last season.

We need 2 strikers. I cant say I have any confidence in us getting 2, in us getting anyone good or in us getting anyone in proactively.

[simongarnerisgod]

any rumours on  "significent investment" january😁

 

 

[MarkBRFC]

1 hour ago, Emerald Isle Rover said:

You can still be a very good performer in a underperforming/poor team

Agreed.

One of the best defenders in the league though?

[RevidgeBlue]

Arguably the originally desperate need to recall O Riordan has been superceded by the form of Pratt and Litherland anyway?

I hope O Riordan isnt just parachuted in in front of those two for the sake of it.

[Exiled_Rover]

4 hours ago, sharpysharps86 said:

Impossible to try and guess who Rovers may or may not go for next month. We don't tend to hear who's coming in until the last minute anyway. However, its clear Gueye is being positioned for a move away, and with Gudjohnsen injured it is absolutely crucial that they bring in a couple of forwards...unless Henriksson suddenly transforms into the next Gyokeres, which seems pretty unlikely!

CB cover also a must, and if they intend to move Pickering on then a LWB cover for Hedges as well. De Neve simply cannot be put back into the team in that position, and I think Ismael probably knows that now.

With Montgomery, Morishita and Tavares all injured then another CM feels needed too. An injury to Tronstad would be devastating, and its really concerning that we'll be going into next season without him.

If Litherland continues to do well then I see less of a need for RWB cover while Alebiosu is away. I'd rather they focussed on more attacking positions. If he (or Alebiosu at AFCON) got injured however, then that changes the landscape.

Awkward month ahead, as usual.

Why do we need CB cover when we've got Litherland and O'Riordan?

[Exiled_Rover]

3 hours ago, wilsdenrover said:

What happens if two of our committee want a player and two of them don’t?

What skill/experience does Gestede have in contract negotiations?

Why are some people unable to use critical thinking?

Then you don't bid for him.

[roversfan99]

2 minutes ago, Exiled_Rover said:

Why do we need CB cover when we've got Litherland and O'Riordan?

Its a starter that we need, to play in the middle, after losing Hyam.

We would then have McLaughlin and Pratt on the left, someone new in the centre, Miller on the right with O'Riordan covering and pushig them both. Which would at least give us more quality and balance.

[Hasta]

Not sure why we still only see fleeting cameo’s of Baradji, but he looks a player when he gets on the pitch. 
 

If he was to remain fit I hope he’s here next season, but I’m concerned how ‘watertight’ any agreement is, and whether or not Baradji can decide he wants a different move.

[KentExile]

35 minutes ago, Hasta said:

Not sure why we still only see fleeting cameo’s of Baradji, but he looks a player when he gets on the pitch. 
 

If he was to remain fit I hope he’s here next season, but I’m concerned how ‘watertight’ any agreement is, and whether or not Baradji can decide he wants a different move.

If there is an option to buy then the terms have already been agreed and signed off by both clubs, the player, agent etc

The only way he doesn't sign is if Rovers do not trigger the option, which given who runs the club, is a possibility

There is the possibility that he is one of the stand out players in the Championship and a club with more finances fancies taking him, in this case he would still be legally obliged to sign for Rovers first (assuming they trigger the option), who would then sell him on at profit.

The main issue is Venkys/Pasha/etc moving the goalposts on us again by changing the budget/project etc, but barring a ridiculous act of self sabotage (*), he will sign for Rovers by the end of the season

 

* which with our owners is a possibility

Edited 48 minutes ago by KentExile

[RevidgeBlue]

39 minutes ago, Exiled_Rover said:

Then you don't bid for him.

That works well...........

Too many cooks etc.

[Exiled_Rover]

27 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

That works well...........

Too many cooks etc.

When money is incredibly tight and half your recruitment team doesn't like a player - either your need to shrink your recruitment team because they don't know what they're talking about, or you don't bid for the player as there isn't a consensus.