Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Nvm it’s gone too. Yep they got the players mixed up then. How can they do such a thing. Absolute clowns. You can’t even blame the club, it’s the sources who’ve done this. 

Posted

If the club have leaked something to protect the actual signing then good on them. I’m all for that if it means we get the player we want with no late moves from clubs who could guzump the deal. 

  • Like 2
Posted

Looks like Jackson dropped the ball there. Norwegian journalist dismissed it as well.

Unlike Jackson, rarely sticks out his neck like that. Must have gotten bad intell

Posted

Dønnum is apparently a right midfielder/wing back. I wouldn't complain if he came here, but it does seem like a strange position to spend what I imagine is relatively serious money on for us.

  • Like 2
Posted
17 minutes ago, Paul Mellelieu said:

Seems to play on both right and left, but not down the middle from that reel.. Why are Bodo letting him go soon after buying him?

It's a good question given his scoring record there was alright too.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Commondore said:

Dønnum is apparently a right midfielder/wing back. I wouldn't complain if he came here, but it does seem like a strange position to spend what I imagine is relatively serious money on for us.

Agreed we need another striker 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Commondore said:

Dønnum is apparently a right midfielder/wing back. I wouldn't complain if he came here, but it does seem like a strange position to spend what I imagine is relatively serious money on for us.

Left footed though and so could be trialled at LWB 

Posted

Dønnum links have disappeared off the face of the earth, that is disappointing... Was fairly excited about that link (through all the shite we experience of being a fan), however was possibly blowing smoke up our arses?

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, briansol said:

Looks like Jackson dropped the ball there. Norwegian journalist dismissed it as well.

Unlike Jackson, rarely sticks out his neck like that. Must have gotten bad intell

It's definitely pulled. I got the message that "the page can't be found".

Somebody has dropped a clanger.

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, BlackburnEnd75 said:

Theyve possibly set him up to embarrass him. He must be struggling for sources at the club post banishment.

I was thinking that.

Jackson's beyond useless in general. I hardly think getting a transfer rumour wrong is the worst thing he's ever done. I was a lot more irritated by his puff pieces on new contracts (edit) and Hedges earlier on today.

Edited by RevidgeBlue
  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Polky said:

If Mercer could follow this up with being correct on the ownership bid then I’d be very happy!

I’d be content if the owners actually took notice and start acting like propper…oh who am I kidding 

Posted
1 hour ago, AVE1875 said:

Dønnum links have disappeared off the face of the earth, that is disappointing... Was fairly excited about that link (through all the shite we experience of being a fan), however was possibly blowing smoke up our arses?

 

Much better to have it fall apart now than after we release the social media video ala Duncan 

Posted
1 hour ago, Elrovers said:

Nvm it’s gone too. Yep they got the players mixed up then. How can they do such a thing. Absolute clowns. You can’t even blame the club, it’s the sources who’ve done this. 

It’s also entirely possible Rovers got the players mixed up and signed the wrong one. Wouldn’t put it past this lot 

Posted

Just looking more into Jorgensen and it is a hard one to get a true feel for.

I am skeptical of the fee. If its true though, he needs to really become an important player as its a decent amount for a club like us.

It is strange that he has joined Bodo Glimt, struggled to become a regular and are seemingly selling him 6 months later for a similar fee.

His position is obviously a bit of a strange one. He seems to have predominantly been played wide and I have seen a couple of comments on twitter suggesting that he isnt a striker from Scandanavians. That being said, playing as one of 2 strikers is a different job to just playing on your own. 

Every player has a good highlights reel so I never get excited by them. But they can provide a bit of use in terms of seeing the type of player youve signed. He doesnt look overly quick but he does look quite physical so hopefully he will be able to adapt.

There has been a lot of debate about the formation, I personally think we are probably right to stick to the 352. Our defenders individually all probably need a third defender as none are particularly great individually and a lot are left footers so theres at least scope for 2 in a back 3. We look far more secure in that formation. Even if Jorgensen is better wide, we dont have any other competent wingers anyway and also our 2 strikers are not best suited to being up on their own.

I think its really important that we get another more natural striker, even if its a loan, and of course a left wing back. I think you need 4 strikers for 2 positions both to cover injuries but also to be able to rotate. Having gamechangers on the bench is criticial too.

Since we changed formation, when Gudjohnsen and Ohashi were on the pitch together, fine even though the latter is very limited and should only be a squad player. But obviously our alternatives were the useless Gueye and also have been players like Henriksson/Dlamini who are quite clearly absolutely nowhere near Championship (or even League 2) forwards. It would be truly amazing if Jorgensen isnt a massive, massive upgrade on them. The question is, is he good enough to hopefully slot in alongside and have a good partnership with Gudjohnsen. We will see.

Posted
3 hours ago, Tricky said:

His wife who's on the books for United had just given birth to their first baby last month...

He's not given birth to the baby, says Roy Kean 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...