To show that's fans have different opinions and some fans on there have forgotten their position 3 years ago

Did Farke and Webber tell the media/supporters that they had 5% chance of staying before the season? At the end of the day Webber and Farke made their choice and they had took full responsibility for it. But everything I have posted in terms of improving the club's structure is correct and will benefit them long term. I admire Webber for saying Publicly that if fans want to blame someone blame me. It was my decision.

You can't judge a fan base by some fans on a internet forum. Just like on here with some people wanted rid of Mowbray. But at games before pre Covid-19 you hear no chants for him to be sack or remove. The close we got was Barnsley at home.

https://forum.pinkun.com/index.php?/topic/138618-20172020-a-remarkable-transformation/ This guy post is spot on

Webber isn't the owner but the Sporting Director of the club who has overseen a massive restructuring of the club including much improved training ground facilities, better academy facilities and improvements made to the recruitment and scouting network. I am saying no cant blame them for their decisions as they have put the club more solid financial footing and after 3 years ago being so close to administration. Protecting their long term future on the club. Their owner Delia Smith doesnt have the owner to fund the club long term. Burnley came up and then got relegated then achieved Promotion the season after. Norwich will probably do the same

that's your opinion and as Webber said he made that decision and many others. and if people don't like it blame him. Is the club on a more solid financial footing, better training facilities, better Academy facilities, better recruitment and scouting departments than when Webber join to now? Yes! Have you seen any of their supporters complaining? or do they back Webber and Farke for the decisions they did to protect the club's future. Watch that interview yet?

Understand the reasons why Webber and the Norwich Board made that decision!!!

Yes the standard of keeper over the last 10 years as gone alot worse.

have I said that Wycombe should accept being a lower league club. All I have done is stated the reasons and understand the reasons why Norwich didn't spend much when they reach the Premier League

Cos the fans know that 3 years ago they were so close to going into administration. Norwich fans remember this. very easy to say spending a sensible amount but they didnt. They instead put the club on sound financial footing and improving a number of structures within the club which the club will benefit for years to come.

I would expect Gallagher, Rothwell and Davenport to start this game We travelled down yesterday and stayed in a hotel overnight. Graham and Holtby were posting pictures of the London eye on Instagram

Armstrong for me.

delighted for Wycombe and Ainsworth

No personal wealth does come in to this for Norwich or Burnley as they aren't owned by Billionaire owners. Stuart Webber has told you the reasons why they didn't spend so instead of keep debating the issue look at his comments and he has now put Norwich on solid financial footing. They instead improve their training ground facilities which was poor when Webber and Farke went there(as they have said in previous comments), Improving Academy facilities and imporving their recruitment and Scouting departments which will help them long term. Its makes sense when you look into the financial problems when Webber was appointed and that's why Ed Balls who was behind bringing Webber in and completely restructuring the football side of the club. But Norwich did spend money improving their structures within the club and not just focus on bring players. So overall the club is in a much better position financial and structural. I am talking about what Norwich have done for their long term future of the club based on the comments from Webber and Farke. 3 years ago the club was days away from going into administration. So Webber has protect the club future long term instead of their over spending that happened years before it

how does everyone think we will do? any lineup thoughts? Millwall recently have been playing 3-4-2-1 formation.

Like I said and others their owners aren't wealthy owners. Delia Smith and her family are worth around 25 million I seen. The club is now on sound financial footing. Webber and the board including Ed Balls(Former MP) wont put the club at risk again going bust as it was only days from happening before Maddison and Murphy were sold. You would know all this if you listen or even read the interview with the links Provided by myself. Yes they have improved the club by investing in training ground facilities, improvements at that academy plus recruitment and scouting departments. Farke knew it was going to tough task. And him and Webber weren't willing to risk spending millions on players given the club financial status 3 years ago. They could do a Burnley under Dyche as I have already said. If we went up and I would expect to be relegation. anything else is a bonus.

So if you aren't interested enough to watch the Webber's interview then why debate the issue. Cos he answered your questions in the interview. As Webber said in the interview he wasn't prepare to risk the financial future of the club and put the club on sound financial footing. Its easy for you to say they should have said x amount of money but you need to look beyond your own opinion and look at the reasons cited by Stuart Webber, Daniel Farke and their board Well if you had look at the Webber's interview He stated their young talent players wont be sold on cheap.

We have no idea what Venkys are thinking and what their plans are for next season. They seem happy enough to keep funding the club. They might back a spending spree or sensible budget or cut backs meaning 2 key players need to selling and players Mowbray wants are restricted to free and loans. Who knows. We will see in the next 12 months. FFP laws need scraping at this level

Webber has rebuilt that club where it is a better financial footing then when he took over as cover. I was impressed by his openness and honest in telling fans, pundits and other people that he was to blame for not over spending and insisting he make the right decisions

Have you read or watched the 2 links I posted on here? I would suggest you read or watch the video of Stuart Webber's comments. He is very open, honest and blunt. He wouldn't put Norwich's financial future at risk. He said he is to blame for not spending and he isn't bothered he is blame cos he is protect the club's financial future. Its very easy for you to say spend this or spend that but if you listen to Webber's comments he wasn't prepared to do that. They have improvement in the Club academy, training facilities plus scouting and recruitment departments within the club. Norwich don't have an owners with millions after millions to spend. When Webber was bought in was to change their reliant on their owners and run the club on a sound financial footing Norwich was set to go bust only 3 years ago before they sold Maddison and Murphy. You mention Burnley? But didn't they go up then got relegated and then got promote season after?

Of course we should be looking domestic based aswell.

Stuart Webber's interview on Norwich City and going forward.

Brereton and Gallagher aren't a number 10

Sorry all I did was post the info that was post out by a Journalist. That's it. I had seen McLaughlin played a few games but not enough to proper opinion