So we have enough money for a bodyguard for Waggott at home games, and enough money to film our own games and beam them back to India (assuming this is done professionally with a director / gallery this is NOT cheap), but not enough money to fund the Women's team? This club is an actual joke.

Sell up and fuck off.

30,000 in a ground nowhere near as big as the modern one. Imagine what it was like when the record attendance of 61,000 was set. 50,000 wasn’t uncommon then. Notice also - if you look closely enough - kids sat over the wall on the running track on all sides of the ground.

Just seen a decent article online alleging Waggott and the owners clashed over the women's team. Apparently a meeting was held last season at which a firm which invests in women's football by taking an equity share offered external investment into the Rovers women's side. The article alleges that Waggott would have been up for such investment but the owners refused because they thought the optics of accepting investment for the women but not the men's team looked bad. Interesting if true. Edit: It might be this Company have done us a massive favour by hastening Waggott's long overdue departure even if they didn't get their investment.

Interesting from tonight's "Coalition" X space. We had one caller who was brought in by what was alleged the owners to provide a different broadcasting option after they'd claimed they felt the fan pressure was getting too much air time on Sky, whilst they were challenging sky's one sided approach by showing protest during live games etc. The caller now believes this was Suhail who wanted to send alternate pictures back to India than the ones being beemed by Sky , and he was under strict instruction to film no banners or audio of unrest!!!!l Absolutely incredible, as in essence wanted to paint a false picture back to the Raos

There's definately a link between the 2 happenings. Anger over Women's team so throw the fans a distraction bone.

But I thought we only had 8,000 fans?

Wow! You couldn't get better publicity for the cause than that! Its a pity the site doesn't have a bigger circulation. Well done.

https://www.thebusinessdesk.com/northwest/news/2152825-unpopular-chief-executive-steve-waggott-leaves-blackburn-rovers

That's exactly what we want though. He's useless, unbelievably bad at communicating and seemingly quiet dense. It further adds to our argument that the ownership is not fit for purpose and needs to be removed by any means necessary.

Strongly suspect Gestede will get that job 🤮😩

Fascinating turn of events. Possibly Steve wanted to support the women's and owners didn't? No coincidence the timing of it all

Andrew Tate is an arsehole - The End. Good luck with your project.

Kean, Agnew, Shaw, Senior, Chesterton, Singh - did any of them leaving really change the trajectory of the club? And if the family read Glenn’s WhatsApp messages, why does it matter which empty suit is in charge here?

If it was planned you'd have written more than a 2 line club statement announcing his departure.

Given that we now have our unanimously elected representative, I would like to put forward the notion that we adopt a position of demanding that the club be put up for sale. No compromise. All those in favour....

https://media3.giphy.com/media/twM4JhOZqs4LmviE3V/giphy.gif?cid=9b38fe91z3sbj76l73iy3phhyn1ktc2h5lvrq52jcew93x97&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

Fixed.

What if we lose the first six or seven last season? Will you change your mind again and concede you were right in the first place and wrong to change your mind when we won a few? 🙂

Explain how what happened could have ended up as good PR?

He may have said things that were right. But they have made absolutely no progression under him in terms of actual football, regressing badly further with no signs of positivity. Well, except for us as its funny.

Colin Blunstone -Say You Don’t Mind.

ffs, move on pal. I have accepted I was wrong but sadly with yourself you just keep going on and on about IT. Yet he was 100% Ruben Amorim explains Man Utd's key issues with warning of 'long suffering'

Radiohead - If You Say The Word

Its not the fact that you was right or wrong to want Ismael out. It is the fact that you are so passionate about what you perceive to be a lack of patience and time given to head coaches sacked either 6 months or 12 months in, to the point of wishing one to be relegated, only to then ask for ours to be sacked after 8 games. The definition of hypocrisy. I think United appointed Amorim as a head coach, not as a fortune teller.