All Activity

I cant believe the clearly sarcastic suggestion that Wharton is much better than Scholes was has been taken so seriously.

Fair point. I'm aware of the distinction but couldnt care less not being a fan of either Club.

It's not ridiculous at all. What we need is an up to date Expose' of some genuine significance which might make a difference. Not a tired old rehash of ancient events which, rightly or wrongly were examined and passed off by the relevant Authorities as "nothing to see here" at the time.

I suppose you can when you don't understand basic life concepts like luck and chance.

What a completely ridiculous comment. I suppose we shouldn't discuss any events that happened in the past because we already know what happened.

Dear me, Rev It's Nottingham Forest and Notts County

Christ, what's your beef with Wharton chaddy? Your obsession with trying to convince everyone that a fairly ordinary Notts Forest player is better than an ex Rover is frankly beyond weird, irrespective of whether you're right or wrong.

What's the point of all this nearly 15 years on? A lot of innuendo from Harris without actually revealing anything we didnt already know or anything particularly significant.

I dont think the stats do back up that opinion personally. They prove that in the Premier League, playing in predominantly a different role in a team with totally different expectations and a totally different style, Anderson has the most progressive carries etc (which isnt really what I personally think is a priority for a holding midfielder) based on stats from whichever company they come from. To extrapolate that to believing that hes been the best midfielder in the league or that it proves the argument that Anderson is the ideal candidate to play a different role for England off the back of that is IMO not correct.

Print extract from Big Sam's podcast. https://www.lancs.live/news/lancashire-news/former-blackburn-rovers-manager-sam-32887568

Sunday nights in 70’s, although we couldn’t afford Matey bubble bath…

Carey looks set for a place on our list. A bit unfair putting him in the 70s section as I read it was a thankless, almost impossible task coming back in 70/71. England and Newton safely through last week. Pickering will be joining them this week. A fine team that fans saw in the 1960s.

Based on what? No-one is reliant on them but used it to back people opinion that Anderson is better suited to playing the number 6 (defensive midfielder) role than Wharton at this stage plus how Tuchel wants that role played and how the team play

Laughable comment. Scholes is one of best midfielder going ever in the PL. Take their Wharton's tinted glasses off

Good read and a load of disgusting yet unsurprising documents to cover up the corruption and incompetence https://sportingintelligence832.substack.com/p/revealed-the-blackburn-files-from

On what basis? He may end up better than Scholes, who knows? But better now than a player rated as the best of his era by many top European players?

He isn’t, he really isn’t

Adam is much better than Scholes

Exactly a Carrick.

This..its pure torture for the fans.

Perhaps a Carrick then?

I keep saying it but nothing will make Venkys fund us to promotion, whatever any judge rules. Mismanaged decline is the path we are on.

That can’t be right as there’s 44 listed on the Delhi website alone.

If you don't have a specific figure In mind, then surely you can't really have an opinion on the final figure, whatever it is.

Wharton’s far more defensively aware than Scholes. Although worth saying before this is posted somewhere on X, clearly not as good a player.