All Activity
- Past hour
-
v Bradford City (h) - 12/8/25 - Carabao Cup
Old Codger replied to Herbie6590's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Would love to one day, but we are away this week. Another time,yah βΊοΈ -
2025 Summer Transfer Thread. π
RevidgeBlue replied to Upside Down's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Yes Vi Ball with one shot on target in the 90 mins is far more entertaining! -
The Aynsley Pears depreciation thread.
bluebruce replied to Neal's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Pears did for a bit, tbf. As much as I'm not a fan. -
2025 Summer Transfer Thread. π
lraC replied to Upside Down's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
We can sit down with fans and fall out attack them though, without too much of a problem though. I never thought I would see it, but to have a backroom team, who hold the fans in such contempt is outrageous. -
2025 Summer Transfer Thread. π
bluebruce replied to Upside Down's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
The extra revenue from Sky in the new deal really isn't all that much. It's an increase of between 500k to 1.5 million per club. Meanwhile more games are televised which means lower crowds. The EFL are terrible negotiators. -
2025 Summer Transfer Thread. π
Ricky replied to Upside Down's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
When Travis went out on loan to Ipswich JDT came out and said he was one of our highest earners and thatβs why heβd loaned him out to free up budget for other players. -
2025 Summer Transfer Thread. π
JHRover replied to Upside Down's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Owners with no money but a plan, ambition, and a brain would still have used a small fraction of the Β£40 million brought in to support an overachieving manager and help him retain his solid squad. They wouldn't have needed to use personal wealth to fund contracts. Maybe use some of the millions extra in TV revenue Sky have provided that gets forgotten about? Billionaires with lots of money but no plan, ambition or brains have chosen to gamble away the club's future by not doing any of those things. -
2025 Summer Transfer Thread. π
joey_big_nose replied to Upside Down's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Yes... I think there is an obvious ceiling on what we can offer, and the quite a few players now have made the assessment that it's worth more to them to leave on a free than sign it. It seems short sighted as I guess it would take an extra Β£5k a week to sign them, which over two years is Β£500k. To not take on that sort of liability we are letting players who are worth Β£3M+ walk out the door. Again sort of thing that an owner close to the action would find a way to navigate. But Venkys are distant and disengaged, and they seem more comfortable creating an arbitrary line in the sand and sticking to it, even if it is madness from a long term planning and financial management perspective. -
2025 Summer Transfer Thread. π
47er replied to Upside Down's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
What is VI trying to do anyway but avoid relegation? Anyone think there's some great plan. "make do and mend " would sum up his Mission Statement. -
Music Association Game
Riversider28 replied to adopted scouser's topic in I Can't Believe It's Not Football
Spooky Tooth-Evil Woman -
2025 Summer Transfer Thread. π
JHRover replied to Upside Down's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Spot on, true story. If the club wanted to keep him it would have offered him a new improved deal last summer, when Eustace was pushing for it. They refused and now we pay the price. Their choice as it has always been. -
2025 Summer Transfer Thread. π
JHRover replied to Upside Down's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
This baffles me. Maybe I'm oblivious but I've seen nothing at all to suggest that he 'wants' to leave or that he hasn't 'bought in' to what VI is trying to do. He has been forced to leave by virtue of the club doing nothing to try and keep him until recent weeks and then if we are being realistic probably giving him an offer that isn't worth the time of day to a player of his ability and importance. That is all on the club - failing to sort contracts out, failing to make competitive appropriate offers and actively inviting interest in key players as a result. He, like the fans and like countless other players and staff members, has been mucked around and taken for a ride by the owners and their stooges. What he wants doesn't come into it any more than what me or you want. It's what the owners/their stooges want that is the source and cause of all our problems. -
2025 Summer Transfer Thread. π
BlackburnEnd75 replied to Upside Down's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
A lot of talk of Travis not wanting to renew his contract. I'm surprised nobody is considering that the powers that be don't actually want him to renew his contract. He' presumably over the 10k mark as it is and he's not exactly going to renew for less is he. Suhail is probably more than happy to get a couple of million quid for Travis and replace his 15k a week for someone on half of that. As club captain I'd imagine that Trav is pretty annoyed about the situation which should have been sorted months ago. -
2025 Summer Transfer Thread. π
davulsukur replied to Upside Down's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
This post needs printing out and slapping the face of everyone who says "just be positive" Building on what we had/have - nar Slam a wrecking ball through the squad and start all over again - yeah! -
2025 Summer Transfer Thread. π
joey_big_nose replied to Upside Down's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
It's not even really about funding... if we had owners with less money, but were engaged and invested and could sit down with our managers and players and articulate a vision, address concerns, show a long term plan we would be able to at least have a chance on retaining our talent. But we can't do that... -
2025 Summer Transfer Thread. π
Emerald Isle Rover replied to Upside Down's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Im personally not sold on Eustace but its damning of the behind the scenes shit show that a manager is willing to walk out mid season to a team that could have been playing league one the following season -
And I'm surprised I'm beating our eagle-eyed Exile to this one (although just had a look in the outgoing loans thread as I typed that and of course he's popped it there), but Charlie Olsson was sent out on loan yesterday to Oldham for the season. They play in League Two after promotion from the National League last season. So I'd say that's a good loan for him, though I imagine they're expected to struggle (drawn both games so far though), so there probably won't be much tolerance for a fairly inexperienced kid learning the ropes. He'll have to be on it from the off. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cj6yypglzpzo
-
2025 Summer Transfer Thread. π
lraC replied to Upside Down's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Not to mention losing the manager, who had us in the play off positions. At least we know we have people at the club, who won't know when we have the next good player in the youth team, so we won't have our heats broken again, if we sell him for half of his real value. What an absolute mess. -
The talkSPORT Cup - QF - v Man City
oldjamfan1 replied to Herbie6590's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Smashed it! Well done lads -
2025 Summer Transfer Thread. π
JHRover replied to Upside Down's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
At the full time whistle at Sheffield United after just missing out on the play-offs all the talk from the commentary team at Sky was about Rovers learning lessons, addressing issues in the squad and going again this season to try and go one better by building on the solid base that we had. All logical, it could be done for relatively low cost simply by keeping the core and replacing some of the loans, maybe signing a couple of quality players. It was widely recognised that we had the foundations of a very competitive side that perhaps just needed some adjustments/a bit more quality. Instead we've demolished the core and spine of that side and replaced with cheap unknown foreigners and kids. The complete and total opposite of what we needed to do and what a side that finished 7th should have been aiming to do, But hey, the Venky stooges have personal financial targets to hit and reputations to forge by 'unearthing' gems and selling for profit so that's all that really matters. -
The Aynsley Pears depreciation thread.
roversfan99 replied to Neal's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
That is not the fear that they have. -
v Bradford City (h) - 12/8/25 - Carabao Cup
roversfan99 replied to Herbie6590's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Very good depth? Only Carter and Cantwell are competent first teamers unavailable to start these first 2 games, I know the latter will be on the bench. If we was to change 11 tonight, our 11 would be something like Michalski, Miller, Atcheson, Wharton, Pickering, Montgomery, Tavares, Mullarkey Matthews, Tyjon, Kargbo, Gueye. If you think that is very good depth, especially considering the inclusion of 5 youngsters with a combined 1 league start between them (in which he was sent off) then I suspect youll be in for a rude awakening as the season goes on, if we dont strengthen. -
Former ingrate - sorry sorry, former Rovers youth product, Rory Finneran, explains why he buggered off without a care for the club that developed him: https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/ex-rovers-youngster-finneran-explains-095808095.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAALoW4t9ACw8mY0MEny2-ha0MzMLmBrrvMshr5KhabcWUkaX3rLGdmkAQ0Je3MKhvltM02tpD6Ta3_9Bby-fPa80X2EE6dpOXzRbsZOQBy0mbnTbg7G3n37WJaQg81DyefYq-PF6B-KycQKH1wwBgD5RNM_OxBXvs2U0XsZSBPqEl
-
v WBA (a) - 9/8/2025 - The Big Kick-Off!
alexanders replied to Herbie6590's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
I agree that we missed Cantwell. The thing is Trav and Tronstad both came deep to collect the ball. We then played out to Ribeiro or Alebiosu and then inside to Axel, De neve or Ohashi. Hedges was never involved in the play and slowed down most attacks. We didn't have the creativity to play the pass which opened up the defense. Looking back we actually came to several good crossing positions from both De Neve and Alebiosu in the first half, but the ball didn't end up where we wanted. Its early doors, but besides the low intensity press there was several positive signs from Saturday.