[Archived] Fulham On Saturday 27Th August

[perthblue02]

Well apparently we were winning for 93/94 minutes according to Keoyles interview, so well done us.

[ffan]

another kick in the nuts for you, sorry lads. it had to be Cairney, didn't it ?

[Stuart]

As soon as he brought Feeney on we surrendered that game it was there for the taking

Sack the clown

Agreed. A real statement of a lack of intent.

Samuelsen could have lifted things and shown some ambition.

This is not the Coyle that took Burnley up so that myth can be dispelled.

I really shouldn't be give where we are at but I'm still gutted to lose like that. Our defence certainly deserved a clean sheet until that point.

[den]

Getting to the stage where defeats are welcome simply because they're the only thing that would bring change. We must have change.

The writings on the wall even after just five games. Stranded at the bottom of the table with one single point after five games - and we've had a relatively easy start fixture wise.

[booth]

Well apparently we were winning for 93/94 minutes according to Keoyles interview, so well done us.

Eh, we were never winning at any point in the game.

[West Yorks Rover]

Never thought I'd see the day when Wigan were getting better crowds than us in the same division, and Huddersfield had almost 20,000 on, that's

what a decent owner can do.

Venky's Out !

[booth]

Getting to the stage where defeats are welcome simply because they're the only thing that would bring change. We must have change.

The writings on the wall even after just five games. Stranded at the bottom of the table with one single point after five games - and we've had a relatively easy start fixture wise.

Don't worry we will have change, a new league and a new low under the Vankers.

[Tom]

The bottom line is unlucky or not we have 1 point from 5 games, 3 of them at home.

Absolutely no chance we aren't being relegated. maybe it's what it takes to get rid of them.

It was nice near the end at 0-0 when the whole ground was in unison with we want Venkys out

[DanielMB]

Lenihan for Guthrie

Stokes for Gallagher

Feeney for Marshall

These are not subs made by a man who is trying hard to win a game....

[ABBEY]

I thought only puffs ironed there grundys

After the discussions this week ..

[perthblue02]

Eh, we were never winning at any point in the game.

Think we have got to humour him , you know what his memory is like

[Stuart]

I give up Neal... This is just madness now, utter disgrace, utter garbage.

I still think that Wolves game is too far for a protest. It kind of needs to happen sooner.

Nobody is listening or watching until the Wolves game.

[Tom]

Agreed. A real statement of a lack of intent.

Samuelsen could have lifted things and shown some ambition.

This is not the Coyle that took Burnley up so that myth can be dispelled.

I really shouldn't be give where we are at but I'm still gutted to lose like that. Our defence certainly deserved a clean sheet until that point.

Felt for the new boys especially, Williams put a real shift in and looked like a left back which is saying something.

Moments before the goal Feeney had the ball in their corner and tried a silly trick and lost it which ultimately led to the goal

[Dreams of 1995]

Didn't get down to the ground today but have heard from several people that Akpan put in a shambolic performance. Again. Yet people will still put him in their line ups in the topic for the next game.

A shame to concede so late again. Wish there was a light at the end of this long, dark tunnel but I can't see it.

Are the Venky's Out chants gaining momentum or was it similar to Burton?

[Stuart]

Well apparently we were winning for 93/94 minutes according to Keoyles interview, so well done us.

Winning? Did I miss a goal?

[Tom]

Didn't get down to the ground today but have heard from several people that Akpan put in a shambolic performance. Again. Yet people will still put him in their line ups in the topic for the next game.

A shame to concede so late again. Wish there was a light at the end of this long, dark tunnel but I can't see it.

Are the Venky's Out chants gaining momentum or was it similar to Burton?

I was there and thought Akpan did ok, in fact him and Guthrie looked the best pairing we've tried so far.

[booth]

Felt for the new boys especially, Williams put a real shift in and looked like a left back which is saying something.

Moments before the goal Feeney had the ball in their corner and tried a silly trick and lost it which ultimately led to the goal

And this is what you get for constantly signing bargain basement players.

[DanielMB]

What did Coyle say? Did he really say we were winning? That usually implies being in front.

[broadsword]

i think we're going down anyway, but at this rate heads will soon drop and it will get embarrassing.

esecially if we get further adrift

[Stuart]

It was nice near the end at 0-0 when the whole ground was in unison with we want Venkys out

It certainly shows that we aren't being fickle, Tom, but I'm waiting for someone to blame our defeat on that negativity.

For me, it's become one of two anthems to support the side but not Venkys. It's still noise and still generates an atmosphere - one which certainly was not destructive, there was no anger or venom, just a clear statement of the fans' thoughts. The other was "Uncle Jack's Barmy / Blue and White Army".

It was also the first time in a long while that I've not heard "Your support is f_____ s___ from the away fans. Fulham were very quiet today in comparison.

Coyle going will change nothing. Venkys need to go.

#enoughisenough #venkysout

[Pedro]

I haven't even considered going to Ewood this season. Most predictable result ever. I'll be there to protest though, not interested in going inside the ground though to be honest.

[johnradfordsubbuteo]

The problem now is that the team is so packed with internationals his preparations for the next match will be horribly disrupted.

Oh wait...that excuse no longer applies.he'll just have to think of another.

[Stuart]

Lenihan for Guthrie

Stokes for Gallagher

Feeney for Marshall

These are not subs made by a man who is trying hard to win a game....

To be fair Guthrie was injured but I thought he'd have brought on Byrne as a like for like.

Stokes I'd have started instead of the unimpressive Gallagher but Feeney was the real towel-throw, and probably cost us.

[DanielMB]

To be fair Guthrie was injured but I thought he'd have brought on Byrne as a like for like.

Stokes I'd have started instead of the unimpressive Gallagher but Feeney was the real towel-throw, and probably cost us.

He was injured yes but the point is that every sub is "like for like". Byrne would have added more creativity than Lenihan.

[Stuart]

He was injured yes but the point is that every sub is "like for like". Byrne would have added more creativity than Lenihan.

Agreed Dan.