Jump to content

Supporters Consultation Meeting


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 466
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Could people attending this meeting please raise with the club about having a match for Tony Parkes to raise funds for alzheimer's or make a match day Tony Parkes day and let him walk the teams out an

This isn’t intended as a thorough summary of the meeting, but here’s what I took away from it. This is from memory, not my notes, please consider this my observation and interpretations.   T

He's wasted plenty more money besides that as well. He gave Mulgrew a 2 year extension and since that extension began he has played just once. Smallwood was given a year extension and since that year

Posted Images

8 hours ago, Miller11 said:

Massive lie.

I never stood up. I’ve told him that at previous meetings and he knows full well my thoughts and reasons. I didn’t proudly do anything... if you remember, Waggott mentioned he spoke to people regularly who went away and never went to Ewood. Bayes then asked if a person who previously mentioned they wouldn’t set foot in Ewood at a previous meeting was in the room. They were, but took a load of abuse last time, so they didn’t say anything.

I’ve been pretty public in my stance for a good few years. I want to go to games, I don’t feel comfortable financially supporting a regime I despise. If not stumping up £300 a year makes me not a fan in your eyes, I won’t lose any sleep.

Hi Miller. I was at the meeting. I respect your views while not agreeing to them. Isn't it time to put to bed the whole Venkys thing. A lot of water has gone under the bridge over the years. We must remember that Venks now fund the club as stated last night.

Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Paul Mani said:

£1.3m was what was left from last summer, so the budget will be refreshed and also effected by players leaving etc making ‘room’.

One interesting pOint by Cheston was on ffp. He stated clearly that ffp is always judged on this years and the previous two years accounts. Meaning that so long as you lose the same amount every year (and  accumulatively that doesn’t exceed £39m over the three years) then your budget literally refreshes every season and you have the same spending power. If that makes sense.

He also said that whilst our submissions for ffp were due in at the end of the month (feb), but we can make some further adjustments if needed up until the end of June when our accounting period ends.

My observation is that a profit sale like Dack for example every three years would make huge dent in our ability to spend as a £20m fee would effectively make us whole for that year which would increase our spending power over any three year period.

Interesting also (as I’ve said SOOO many times) that in particular Mowbray said on numerous occasions that failing all else, if he really wanted to spend more Money, the owners had told him he only had to ask.

My overriding emotion now following the meeting is that we have a leadership structure who do care passionately about the club.

Mowbray is far from dull. He’s passionate, animated, BRUTALLY honest about himself, his players, the market. I can 100% see why the lads including Jonty and Dunny love him so much. He hasn’t got tons of cash sloshing about but he does have a plan on how to use it better. Which he talked to me about openly and in detail. Based off the meeting and my first ever 10 mins with him one to one, he is absolutely the man to take us on for as long as he has that desire!  

He has had quite some time to take us forward but hasn’t done with any significance 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike confirmed thst the FFP rules do include our season in L1. i.e Championship FFP rules are the last 3 years losses, regardless that whilst actually in L1 being measured by SCMP.

Having had that clarified.

2017-18 = £16.8 million

2018-19 = £19.5 million

Meaning this season circa £3 million losses allowed....

He would only repeat his line..."at the moment we are FFP compliant"

If necessary "various adjustments are available to them" before June deadline.

ACV makes any sale and lease back of Ewood difficult (perhaps unlikely).

Players are not shown as assets on the balance sheet so that is available if required (not exactly sure what he meant by that).

Sounded like they had a plan to make said adjustments before June to remain compliant.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

£1.3 million was budget in Jan.

That makes a mockery of talk of buying players for 2 - 4 mill. Forget it. 

Self imposed wage cap. Will not break it. Many Champ players on £50K and ours are on a quarter.... that's £12.5K so don't believe that myself but the general point stands.

Emphasis on the kids and academy (from Steve) from financial solution POV. Conflict is Tony needing men ready for Champ. Warton will be re-assessed in summer but some weeks he gets bullied at Northampton so still needs to improve to be ready for Champ.

 

Defenders did come. Walton, Tosin, Cunningham.

Accepted back to square 1 in summer.

Sounded like no appetite to actually buy a defender...none really identified who we can afford and fits criteria.

 

We will bring in 2 x GKs in summer.

(remember same said in summer).

Tosin - no chance to buy (£18 mill or something) but will try to get another 6 month loan from City.

Walton was not the GK we wanted. Last minute after Raya left. Nearly sent back in Jan but Tony likes him and wanted give him chance and support him. Personally I am OK with that.

Edited by OldEwoodBlue
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Miller11 said:

Massive lie.

I never stood up. I’ve told him that at previous meetings and he knows full well my thoughts and reasons. I didn’t proudly do anything... if you remember, Waggott mentioned he spoke to people regularly who went away and never went to Ewood. Bayes then asked if a person who previously mentioned they wouldn’t set foot in Ewood at a previous meeting was in the room. They were, but took a load of abuse last time, so they didn’t say anything.

I’ve been pretty public in my stance for a good few years. I want to go to games, I don’t feel comfortable financially supporting a regime I despise. If not stumping up £300 a year makes me not a fan in your eyes, I won’t lose any sleep.

Not a lie. You announced it proudly. Had you been looking around at the audiences you’d have seen the disdain.

Wow, hypocrisy of the highest level. You’re not funding Venkys by paying. They’re funding us!! What you are doing by not paying is limiting your teams ability to compete. Which is odd because you seem to have a strong opinion on how the club should be run. Whilst I don’t agree, I completely respect those who have made a moral decision not to go. But to go every week on comps whilst taking the moral high ground is unthinkable for me. I could go complimentary every week too but I choose to pay. We are a million miles apart.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He is a passionate football man, I’ve always liked that about him. As usual his charisma at these meetings come in handy for Waggott and Cheston.

But he is only ‘absolutely the man to take us on for as long as he has that desire’ if he gets results, his ‘desire’, his ‘honesty’ , ‘his passion’ are not how he will be judged (or shouldn’t be).

Edited by Mattyblue
Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, OldEwoodBlue said:

Mike confirmed thst the FFP rules do include our season in L1. i.e Championship FFP rules are the last 3 years losses, regardless that whilst actually in L1 being measured by SCMP.

Having had that clarified.

2017-18 = £16.8 million

2018-19 = £19.5 million

Meaning this season circa £3 million losses allowed....

He would only repeat his line..."at the moment we are FFP compliant"

If necessary "various adjustments are available to them" before June deadline.

ACV makes any sale and lease back of Ewood difficult (perhaps unlikely).

Players are not shown as assets on the balance sheet so that is available if required (not exactly sure what he meant by that).

Sounded like they had a plan to make said adjustments before June to remain compliant.

 

Calculating FFP losses isn’t just a case of adding up the losses in the club’s accounts. The FFP calculation is a separate one that takes into account allowable expenditure. So for instance the published (accounting) loss might be say £10m but that is calculated after say Academy costs of £3m. The FFP loss therefore would be £7m. This is highly simplistic but hopefully illustrative.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Parsonblue said:

That's happened at Ewood before now when we loaned a club our away kit for a League game after the ref ruled against the away kit they had brought with them.  It would appear that it was Mowbray who wanted the third kit because they found the away kit was not always suitable for some colour clashes.

Once again, I thought both Mowbray and Waggott came over very well and clearly have the best interests of the club at heart. 

I thought Mowbray's comments on transfer policy were detailed and open and clearly he has a large say in that area of the club so it was quite right for him to cover that part of the agenda.

The meetings illustrate that the different groups in attendance have different views on certain things so it's not easy for those in charge to find compromises.  Some supporters fully agreed with Mowbray with regard to putting the away fans as far away from the pitch as possible whilst others felt atmosphere was more important and wanted them in the lower tier.  I suspect, and would hope, that Mowbray's view would be the one we follow.  At many away grounds you are either in a corner or upstairs - out of the way - so the noise impact from away fans is reduced.  

We played in our red & black away kit at home to Man City in the early days of the PL as well 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Mattyblue said:

He is a passionate football man, I’ve always liked that about him. As usual his charisma at these meetings come in handy for Waggott and Cheston.

But he is only ‘absolutely the man to take us on for as long as he has that desire’ if he gets results, his ‘desire’, his ‘honesty’ , ‘his passion’ are not how he will be judged (or shouldn’t be).

I don’t get the disdain for Cheston. He’s an accountant. I know a few and the ones with charisma are very much the exception ? Thankfully none of them are Rovers fans so I might just get away with posting this. ?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Herbie6590 said:

Calculating FFP losses isn’t just a case of adding up the losses in the club’s accounts. The FFP calculation is a separate one that takes into account allowable expenditure. So for instance the published (accounting) loss might be say £10m but that is calculated after say Academy costs of £3m. The FFP loss therefore would be £7m. This is highly simplistic but hopefully illustrative.

 

 

.agreed but the general point stands that we are very close... just not sure how close.

This is why they have taken on 8 new staff at the academy and spent half a million on the pitches.... The headline figures dont tell us the detailed story but they still give us an indicator.

The point is many thought FFP didnt look at our season in L1 but it does.

"adjustments are coming" ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Paul Mani said:

Not a lie. You announced it proudly. Had you been looking around at the audiences you’d have seen the disdain.

Wow, hypocrisy of the highest level. You’re not funding Venkys by paying. They’re funding us!! What you are doing by not paying is limiting your teams ability to compete. Which is odd because you seem to have a strong opinion on how the club should be run. Whilst I don’t agree, I completely respect those who have made a moral decision not to go. But to go every week on comps whilst taking the moral high ground is unthinkable for me. I could go complimentary every week too but I choose to pay. We are a million miles apart.

I answered a question honestly. Like I said, other people in the room were in the same boat but didn’t fancy the hassle. Again, I’ve been consistent and open about it publicly for a long time. Did I stand up, or was that an exaggeration for effect? 

Yes, I’m sure Jonty or someone else would shower you with tickets. But your 0.005% of Brereton’s fee a year is a small price for the particular piece of moral high ground you like to stand on.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Herbie6590 said:

I don’t get the disdain for Cheston. He’s an accountant. I know a few and the ones with charisma are very much the exception ? Thankfully none of them are Rovers fans so I might just get away with posting this. ?

 

 

I don’t expect him to have any that’s the point.  Dry topics, yet vital ones and it seems that TM is wheeled out to take up half the meeting with his ‘jumpers for goalposts’ routine and what fan wouldn’t love to hear it, even if you went with the best intentions to talk about other matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Paul Mani said:

£1.3m was what was left from last summer, so the budget will be refreshed and also effected by players leaving etc making ‘room’.

One interesting pOint by Cheston was on ffp. He stated clearly that ffp is always judged on this years and the previous two years accounts. Meaning that so long as you lose the same amount every year (and  accumulatively that doesn’t exceed £39m over the three years) then your budget literally refreshes every season and you have the same spending power. If that makes sense.

He also said that whilst our submissions for ffp were due in at the end of the month (feb), but we can make some further adjustments if needed up until the end of June when our accounting period ends.

My observation is that a profit sale like Dack for example every three years would make huge dent in our ability to spend as a £20m fee would effectively make us whole for that year which would increase our spending power over any three year period.

Interesting also (as I’ve said SOOO many times) that in particular Mowbray said on numerous occasions that failing all else, if he really wanted to spend more Money, the owners had told him he only had to ask.

My overriding emotion now following the meeting is that we have a leadership structure who do care passionately about the club.

Mowbray is far from dull. He’s passionate, animated, BRUTALLY honest about himself, his players, the market. I can 100% see why the lads including Jonty and Dunny love him so much. He hasn’t got tons of cash sloshing about but he does have a plan on how to use it better. Which he talked to me about openly and in detail. Based off the meeting and my first ever 10 mins with him one to one, he is absolutely the man to take us on for as long as he has that desire!  

That plans really paid off so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Doogs said:

Hi Miller. I was at the meeting. I respect your views while not agreeing to them. Isn't it time to put to bed the whole Venkys thing. A lot of water has gone under the bridge over the years. We must remember that Venks now fund the club as stated last night.

I don’t think they deserve credit for continuing to fund their own mess.
 

It would certainly be easier to, and in all honesty with Waggott and Mowbray, two people who I like and feel are positive and decent, it’s getting closer. Unfortunately the issues with Venkys I believe remain. I do t think they have learnt a thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Miller11 said:

I don’t think they deserve credit for continuing to fund their own mess.
 

It would certainly be easier to, and in all honesty with Waggott and Mowbray, two people who I like and feel are positive and decent, it’s getting closer. Unfortunately the issues with Venkys I believe remain. I do t think they have learnt a thing.

Hi Miller

Thanks for your reply. Venkys fund the club monthly as the FD stated last night. What would you like them to do, that would satisfy you?

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Tom said:

I think if you go on behalf of a group, the forum in this case it’s expected you would report it back to that group.

 

I’m happy to talk about anything which was public record to anyone on here. Most has been covered. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Miller11 said:

I answered a question honestly. Like I said, other people in the room were in the same boat but didn’t fancy the hassle. Again, I’ve been consistent and open about it publicly for a long time. Did I stand up, or was that an exaggeration for effect? 

Yes, I’m sure Jonty or someone else would shower you with tickets. But your 0.005% of Brereton’s fee a year is a small price for the particular piece of moral high ground you like to stand on.

Penny’s make pounds brother and owt is better than nowt! Like I said....we have very little in common in relation to this.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Paul Mani said:

I’m happy to talk about anything which was public record to anyone on here. Most has been covered. 

Sorry Paul, I'm pretty certain he'd say what he said to you to anyone else. That's the first time you've met him right? So can't be mates or anything? So is it really 'off the record'?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Paul Mani said:

I’m happy to talk about anything which was public record to anyone on here. Most has been covered. 

Well at least divulge the topic, last time there was a SCM all the private conversations got relayed onto Social Media & here. TM & Co.. know that people will tell other people about what they discuss, a "private chat" at an open forum for mega fans of the club isn't EVER going to remain private - so I highly doubt he said anything he wanted to remain top secret...

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Miller11 said:

I don’t think they deserve credit for continuing to fund their own mess.
 

It would certainly be easier to, and in all honesty with Waggott and Mowbray, two people who I like and feel are positive and decent, it’s getting closer. Unfortunately the issues with Venkys I believe remain. I do t think they have learnt a thing.

Tell that to Bolton fans...mad mad view this! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sat in that same room in August 2019, and listened to an Neil Yardley chat with Tony Mowbray & Charlie Mulgrew.
TM said that he was hopeful we could compete with the defence we had, that he trusted Charlie as our captain, and then in a private conversation Elliott Bennett said the squad had an internal target to finish 6th and above. He firmly believed they could do it, and I could see he meant it.

A matter of days later and Charlie Mulgrew is at Wigan on loan.

I don't trust a thing that's said at these meetings anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • J*B unpinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.