Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Supporters Consultation Meeting


Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Tom said:

https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/18217435.live-updates-rovers-supporters-consultation-meeting/

 

All chaddys pictures are coming from here if you’d prefer to read it at the source 

Chaddy isn’t there ? What a strange thing to do . The answer are how I expected . It’s a bit easier to weave a story around what has happened after . 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can never have the kind of players you need to get promoted because Mowbray can’t integrate higher earners into the team.

Great stuff.

What exactly is our plan to get out of this cycle of failure and rising debt...?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Backroom

Waggott ‘went to bat’ for the fans to ensure we didn’t have a season ticket price increase and stopped us having to wear an opposition kit by introducing a third kit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Backroom
5 minutes ago, Inglorious basturk said:

He actually said this ? Why would we wear an oppositions kit ? That just doesn’t happen now 

Apologies it was Tony 

“TM said he wanted to prevent Rovers having to play in an opposition's kit.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tom said:

Apologies it was Tony 

“TM said he wanted to prevent Rovers having to play in an opposition's kit.”

Just as daft , in these days of squad numbers there is no way we would wear an opposition kit . There wouldn’t be a full squad of the home teams away kit ( match specifications ) the sponsors wouldn’t allow it etc . Is he daft or do they think we are daft ?? 
I agree with tombola re away fans but don’t make exceptions for Leeds and Preston 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Backroom

Rather than all the January BS, has anything been said about ownership? Finances? Commerciality? Tony Parkes?

Y'know, the actual agenda? We should reject Tony (or any manager) being part of these meetings, that's not what they should be!

Should be board members and relevant members of staff. It's NOTHING to do with the playing side.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mike E said:

Rather than all the January BS, has anything been said about ownership? Finances? Commerciality? Tony Parkes?

Y'know, the actual agenda? We should reject Tony (or any manager) being part of these meetings, that's not what they should be!

Should be board members and relevant members of staff. It's NOTHING to do with the playing side.

It's amazing you were not there, isn't it ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mike E said:

Rather than all the January BS, has anything been said about ownership? Finances? Commerciality? Tony Parkes?

Y'know, the actual agenda? We should reject Tony (or any manager) being part of these meetings, that's not what they should be!

Should be board members and relevant members of staff. It's NOTHING to do with the playing side.

Have you read any of the live blog?

If Tony wasn’t there you’d be criticising him for not fronting up to the fans.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.