Adam Wharton

[chaddyrovers]

2 hours ago, roversfan99 said:

I find it a little strange how you are seeking out Forest twitter pages to back up Anderson. 

I also think your inability to question things is summed up by how you are interpreting these stats. Because Anderson is top of a list of random stats, you stated that hes the best midfielder in the Premier League the other day. Now you are passing on these stats today as if they prove your point or that he was more effective.

Question things? Oh give a rest FFS

Yes Sky Sports pundits were discussing Anderson and showed how he the number 1 Midfielder in the PL. 

2 hours ago, roversfan99 said:

They are different types of players and they featured in different ways and at totally different stages of the game. Anderson was on for much less time but the game was totally different, Albania had conceded, they were knackered and England were totally dominant. He won all of his "ground duels" (very vague phrase) which was 1 of 1, for example.

As I repeatedly said Anderson is more suited to play the 6 role than Wharton under Tuchel's tactics 

 

2 hours ago, roversfan99 said:

The stats quoted are seemingly from fotmob but they have also been cherry picked. Wharton has a higher rating, and created the most chances out of everyone in the game apparently.

Higher rating? Based on people's opinion on each person performance

2 hours ago, roversfan99 said:

Point being, dont just take randomly selected and inherently flawed stats as proof of certain conclusions.

Give it rest RF99. If those stats were in Wharton favour, you been all over it like a rash and shouting it from roof tops

2 hours ago, roversfan99 said:

Are you basing this purely on a few England games against poor opposition?

Always Downplaying who we played, the fact of the matter we can beat who we play. The fact of the matter Anderson is much suited to our we want our number 6 to play