Venky’s (& Suhail) Out Protest Ideas

[RoversClitheroe]

22 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

They split the club into 3. They want CEO to run the Administration side of the club, Pasha to run the commercial side of the club and Gestede to run the football operations side of the club. 

That's not what a CEO is though Chaddy.

You really believe Pasha (the man who directly reports into the owners instead of the CEO) isnt actually the CEO?

[roversfan99]

Pasha to run the commercial side 😂

Funnier even than Gestede running the football side.

They want someone to take the role of CEO who is happy to have minimal responsibility to give the power mainly to Suhail. 

[wilsdenrover]

They can split the club a million ways if they wish.

It’s still supposed to be the CEO in overall control.

[RoverDom]

7 hours ago, chaddyrovers said:

They split the club into 3. They want CEO to run the Administration side of the club, Pasha to run the commercial side of the club and Gestede to run the football operations side of the club. 

The CEO should have accountability for it all. If he wants to delegate it out elsewhere that's fine but the buck stops with him. 

[Mattyblue]

You looking forward to seeing what Suhail can do with the commercial side, Chadster?

Edited 11 hours ago by Mattyblue

[wilsdenrover]

[RoverDom]

20 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said:

Now draw Rovers

[DutchRover]

Suhail under the CEO so he has someone else to blame but over CEO with all the decision making power.

[Tomphil2]

10 hours ago, chaddyrovers said:

They split the club into 3. They want CEO to run the Administration side of the club, Pasha to run the commercial side of the club and Gestede to run the football operations side of the club. 

So it's a CAO they need to run a specific department not a CEO to run the whole show.

[chaddyrovers]

3 hours ago, RoverDom said:

The CEO should have accountability for it all. If he wants to delegate it out elsewhere that's fine but the buck stops with him. 

I totally agree Dom. The Owner/CEO should run the show and people under them answer to the Owner/CEO. 

Simple structure is need here 

Owner/CEO with deputy CEO under that with a couple of directors on the board like Financial director and non-executive directors then the head of department reporting the Owner/CEO and the board. Agree? 

2 hours ago, Mattyblue said:

You looking forward to seeing what Suhail can do with the commercial side, Chadster?

He's been doing it since he was appointed here COO. 

 

[Mattyblue]

No wonder it’s been a disaster then.

[wilsdenrover]

[funny-old-game]

56 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

I totally agree Dom. The Owner/CEO should run the show and people under them answer to the Owner/CEO. 

Simple structure is need here 

Owner/CEO with deputy CEO under that with a couple of directors on the board like Financial director and non-executive directors then the head of department reporting the Owner/CEO and the board. Agree? 

He's been doing it since he was appointed here COO. 

 

He's been running the whole show for 8 year+ chaddy. How've you not got that?

[mhead]

15 hours ago, RoverDom said:

Spam that post  

Dont do that.....just send your CV to them. Clog the works.

Lets see how many are sent. Low Egos only, mind.

[Crimpshrine]

20 hours ago, Forever Blue said:

My view of what? The court case deals with a very specific issue that has nothing to do with Rovers.

The ED investigation will be concerned with all Venky's activities of which Rovers are a part. Rovers get mentioned regularly in the court cases. Even if the initial trigger for the investigation was not Rovers related, they still need to go to court every time they need to fund the club. See below from last week's case.

 26.05.2025 O R D E R 1.

The present application has been filed by the petitioner seeking that the petitioner be allowed to remit a sum of GBP 4,850,000 to its wholly owned subsidiary, namely Venky’s London Limited, situated in London, United Kingdom. CM APPL.23948/2025 (for directions) 2. It is submitted that the petitioner has received a communication dated 26.03.2025 from the Chief Financial Officer of Blackburn Rovers Football Club, which is owned by the abovementioned wholly owned subsidiary of the petitioner. 

[Waggy76]

47 minutes ago, funny-old-game said:

He's been running the whole show for 8 year+ chaddy. How've you not got that?

Probably from the start in some or other !

[lraC]

3 minutes ago, Crimpshrine said:

The ED investigation will be concerned with all Venky's activities of which Rovers are a part. Rovers get mentioned regularly in the court cases. Even if the initial trigger for the investigation was not Rovers related, they still need to go to court every time they need to fund the club. See below from last week's case.

 26.05.2025 O R D E R 1.

The present application has been filed by the petitioner seeking that the petitioner be allowed to remit a sum of GBP 4,850,000 to its wholly owned subsidiary, namely Venky’s London Limited, situated in London, United Kingdom. CM APPL.23948/2025 (for directions) 2. It is submitted that the petitioner has received a communication dated 26.03.2025 from the Chief Financial Officer of Blackburn Rovers Football Club, which is owned by the abovementioned wholly owned subsidiary of the petitioner. 

Do we know if they deposited the 50% in the bond to allow this to e released and then sent the amount to VLL to pay the liabilities?

If they haven't, this could be the reason the Travis for sale rumours have started. 

if it was requested nearly 2 months ago, if it hasn't been sent, there could be major issues.

[Wheelton Blue]

17 minutes ago, lraC said:

Do we know if they deposited the 50% in the bond to allow this to e released and then sent the amount to VLL to pay the liabilities?

If they haven't, this could be the reason the Travis for sale rumours have started. 

if it was requested nearly 2 months ago, if it hasn't been sent, there could be major issues.

To me, it's as plain as day what's going on.

No contract renewals; no new signings; rumours of outgoings....can only mean one thing IMO.

[lraC]

14 minutes ago, Wheelton Blue said:

To me, it's as plain as day what's going on.

No contract renewals; no new signings; rumours of outgoings....can only mean one thing IMO.

I do agree, but the odd person on here, can usually confirm, for definite.

Edited 6 hours ago by lraC

[funny-old-game]

1 hour ago, Waggy76 said:

Probably from the start in some or other !

Ye part of the original set-up and then came back 8 years ago but under the radar.. Just trying to get chaddy to look deeper 😉

Edited 6 hours ago by funny-old-game

[Eldirk]

2 hours ago, Wheelton Blue said:

To me, it's as plain as day what's going on.

No contract renewals; no new signings; rumours of outgoings....can only mean one thing IMO.

For the hard of thinking such as myself. What does it mean?

Edited 4 hours ago by Eldirk
Used wrong word.

[DutchRover]

24 minutes ago, Eldirk said:

For the hard of thinking such as myself. What does it mean?

We're broke and Venky's can't/won't send any money, so we need to sell anyone we can and cut costs just to keep the lights on.

[Mike E]

4 hours ago, mhead said:

Dont do that.....just send your CV to them. Clog the works.

Lets see how many are sent. Low Egos only, mind.

I hope you’ve sent yours 😉

[Waggy76]

3 hours ago, DutchRover said:

We're broke and Venky's can't/won't send any money, so we need to sell anyone we can and cut costs just to keep the lights on.

We would be much better off if the lights got switched off! 

Venkys Out!