Venky’s (& Suhail) Out Protest Ideas

[lraC]

2 hours ago, Upside Down said:

The people on the FF still have to abide by the rules.

We don't want to give them an inch. I'm sure if they've tried to hide something then it will come out anyway, but when has there ever been a great revelation in these meetings? Not sure why everyone gets so worked up about it TBH.

I think people get worked up about it, due to these meetings being built up, as a way of bringing some sort of action against the people who are damaging it and spouting down right lies.

Pasha and Gestede are the two main culprits right now, with the former apparently telling the owners, they do not need to fund the club and that everything is hunky dory. He is supposedly sending edited versions of match highlights to the owners too, if postings on here and other sites, are to be believed.

Gestede is coming outwith all sorts of shit, such as we have an exciting summer ahead and embarrassing himself in some of the interviews he has done.

Glen Mullen posted on here and on Twitter about how the meeting had gone and I know he will post the truth if minutes do not accurately reflect certain elements of it. 
 

People expect some sort of fight back and hope that by hearing some positives from these meetings, things will get better and have some assurances that promises will be kept. Maybe even a revelation from the horses mouths about what’s really happening in India now with the courts and the action being taken by ED.

If we get absolutely no feedback at all, or a diluted version of events, then I would scrap the FF as so far as I am concerned at the minute, they are just an ego trip for a few fans. 

[arbitro]

Maybe he should have a word with our owners then.

 

[MarkBRFC]

Isn't this just the norm with the minutes these days?

They always seem to be released a few weeks after the meeting.

[Mattyblue]

Just standard strange behaviour from a strange football club.

[glen9mullan]

6 hours ago, lraC said:

So they were rattled and the reasons for that SHOULD be in the minutes.

The minutes have been written from what we have been told on here, yet no sign of them being published.

No explanation so far as to why they are delayed either, despite a post on this site, saying they will be out early this week.

Is it time to spill the beans, as it has become a pointless organisation the fans forum, if people are prepared to cow tow to the clubs apparent resistance to allow a public record of what went on in these meetings? 
Perhaps there is another reason for the delay, but I can’t help thinking the club are not happy with the contents of the minutes, so want them amending. 

 

The delay is not club related, minutes were drafted quickly and approved by club.

Some of the points have been asked to be looked at again from attendees, on their first viewing of the approved  minutes, so in essence the initial delay is duets this. 

So no conspiracy theory or minutes being altered by club at this stage. 

[SIMON GARNERS 194]

7 hours ago, lraC said:

Perhaps there is another reason for the delay, but I can’t help thinking the club are not happy with the contents of the minutes, so want them amending. 

 

This was my greatest fear with these meetings,a lack of transparency and honesty from the Club's side...its been going on for some fifteen years.

[lraC]

3 hours ago, MarkBRFC said:

Isn't this just the norm with the minutes these days?

They always seem to be released a few weeks after the meeting.

the norm, le leading to suspicion, as it does not take that long the minutes.

Someone is opposing them, either the FF group of the club, as the writer of them advise they would be released by now.

[lraC]

1 hour ago, glen9mullan said:

The delay is not club related, minutes were drafted quickly and approved by club.

Some of the points have been asked to be looked at again from attendees, on their first viewing of the approved  minutes, so in essence the initial delay is duets this. 

So no conspiracy theory or minutes being altered by club at this stage. 

Thanks for clarifying.

So some of the attendees are not happy that they accurately reflect what was said?