Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, chaddyrovers said:

Mowbray and Waggott both said publicly that Mowbray didnt get Waggott the CEO job

Of course they have. Hardly going to say he did get him the job is he?

Posted
2 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

none of know but their comments are a matter of public record

“We will respect Jack Walkers legacy” is a matter of public record too

  • Like 8
Posted

The matter of public record thing has become the new stakeholders. It was also the reasoning behind believing every word about Suhail's spiel about budgets and spending. If its on public record then it must be 100% true and each word must be taken literally.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Tomphil2 said:

So was Waggot saying they'd bought a new coach.

Not to mention someone pressed save instead of send.

Edited by lraC
  • Like 3
Posted
12 hours ago, chaddyrovers said:

or maybe both are telling the truth

Imagine seeing everything that has happened here in the last 15 years and then actually thinking this could be possible.

  • Like 3
  • Hmm 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Mattyblue said:

Someone’s obviously stumbled across a new phrase and will now be using it to death in completely the wrong context.

Never a shortage of twists and turns™ on this message board.

Posted

Will it be a worthwhile exercise?

i.e. Will Miller and Glen once again be there to ask some searching questions and report back the correct minutes of what was actually said rather than the heavily redacted and/or embellished version the Club want everyone to see?

Or will it be back to tea and biscuits, nodding along in agreement to everything whilst the Club either stonewall questions or agree "to look into" various matters?

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, RevidgeBlue said:

Will it be a worthwhile exercise?

i.e. Will Miller and Glen once again be there to ask some searching questions and report back the correct minutes of what was actually said rather than the heavily redacted and/or embellished version the Club want everyone to see?

Or will it be back to tea and biscuits, nodding along in agreement to everything whilst the Club either stonewall questions or agree "to look into" various matters?

I've not attended, Action Group stance is clear, transparent minutes and democratic representation.

Following the last FF meeting we cant accept this as the only two way communication.  We've made our points known prior to the meeting of the above and will wait with baited breath if this appears in the minutes.

Right now the AGs focus is on protests, comms via media and if the motion passed,gatecrashing the Derby game.

Edited by glen9mullan

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...