J*B

Nobody knows! Well, someone must do. But we're here to speculate and i'm going to speculate with: Yes, but its a fucking pain in the arse and expensive.

I find all of this so interesting. I can't believe its come to this, but it has and its extremely interesting.

If the judge managed 16 cases today before walking out for another commitment and we where item number 36, what happens next time if he does another 16 cases before calling it a day i.e. gets to number 32? Another delay, you would assume? Would love to hear the @RoversTrust ask this question, in addition to a question on the 98% successful prosecution rate if @phili can source it.

Whilst I don't doubt this, can we get a fact-check on this? Can you provide a source?

One-hundred percent, its fantastic. I spent hours watching the wrong court case, including a pretty heated discussion about the number of computers in a nursery school.

Did you post the link of the right one, or the wrong one which I sat through for hours for no reason?

Probably not to be fair.

Some cases seem to be super quick. The lawyer thats on now seems to be very professional and well prepared.

The display board (https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/display_board) is still updating. Item 37 has just switched from "Not in session" to "A51 hearing".

I'm still watching too. Exactly this, I haven't seen any indication that anyone or anything has been delayed.

I must have missed this, I don't remember hearing it?

Also John Eustace and Steve Waggott dialled in.

Thats me. Wrong info though - we're item 36. They're on item 27 now.

I can't listen to much more of this. I've no idea whats going on.

What number are we? Have you got a link to it?

Do the right thing and force them to sell us, Mr Sanjeev Narula. You can have the keys to Blackburn in return.

Worth noting, whilst I agree you've got a fantastic player - and importantly, person - you where the only club in world football that bid the asking price for him. So whilst I agree with the sentiment, to say the fee is 'derisory' simply doesn't make sense. If it was a derisory fee then we'd have been batting off bids.

The excuse, I would hypothesise, is if they lose the court case on Tuesday or the same restrictions remain, the money generated will cover us until the next appeal ergo can't be spent.

JRC when fit Sigurdsson when on his game

Go well, Dacky. Some fantastic performances for this club and a player that was universally loved and has never said a bad word about us. Totally appalled by some of the comments i've seen from 'Rovers fans' - mostly on X - seemingly mocking him for having two major injuries. No wonder players don't want to stay here for their full career.

Couldn't agree more - thanks for everything Sammie, when we needed someone to step up you rose to the challenge and played with both arte et labour, i'll always give you a round of applause for that.

Kept us afloat Jan - August

9M + add ons being reported by Ipswich local journalist.

I say that’s Kalvin Phillips.

Sammie gone according to SSN, medical in the morning. I see three scenarios playing out: 1) Venkys win their court case on Tuesday and - subject to still being interested in doing so - begin to fund the club again. That will mean we will have the Szmodics money and potentially the Raya money to spend this window. 2) Venkys have their case pushed back again and the Szmodics money is banked to cover running costs until January 3) Venkys lose the court case, the Szmodics money is used to cover loses whilst a buyer is fou