Tim Southampton Rover Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 3-5-2 again I'm not sure whether I should be worried about 3-5-2 being our tactic for next season or not.
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
budha Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 3-5-2 again I'm not sure whether I should be worried about 3-5-2 being our tactic for next season or not. I kind of like it. Only thing is that we're missing a couple of strikers.
67splitscreen Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 The official match blog reckons around 2000 there and in fine voice.
Backroom Tom Posted July 20, 2010 Backroom Posted July 20, 2010 More worryingly is Olsson has gone off injured.
Doaksie Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 1-0 pne And we revert back to 4-4-1-1 after going behind. Experiment over??
Backroom Tom Posted July 20, 2010 Backroom Posted July 20, 2010 More likely to do with pedersen replacing Ollson on the left and judge going out right.
budha Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 And we revert back to 4-4-1-1 after going behind. Experiment over?? We reverted to 4-4-2 after Samba injured against Sturm Graz, but continued with 3-5-2 in the next game. It's weird if we need to change formation when a player is taken off, seems that we have very limited amount of players suitable for 3-5-2.
Tim Southampton Rover Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 Maybe it's just a case of trying a plan B just in case we need to play with 3 at the back & he probably wanted to see what Olsson was like as a wing back. He's got pace and energy to burn and maybe it would have suited him better than a left winger. No point carrying on if we don't have the players to play in it. Nice play by Preston down the right, Givet blocks the centre for a corner. The home fans want handball. This results in the Rovers fans chanting handball at every opportunity thereafter, very amusing.
67splitscreen Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 In the Preston list of subs, above, Andreas, on the official board he is named as, Arestidou, putting them together is he the Greek keeper we signed a couple of years back.
Backroom Tom Posted July 20, 2010 Backroom Posted July 20, 2010 That moment against United at Ewood last season was brilliant especially the crechendo of noise when Pedersen picked the ball up for a throw
Doaksie Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 It's weird if we need to change formation when a player is taken off, seems that we have very limited amount of players suitable for 3-5-2. And this is why the formation will never work for us. Apart from a back-up I suppose. With our limited funds we'll never be able to bring in new players which will suit into this formation, especially at this stage of the pre-seaason. It seems that Sam is content to go into the season with a very limited squad, hence why he is trying to get as much pre-season minutes into as much of the squad as possible. Having 2 games in such close proximity will enable us to get more players up to speed and more familiar with the first team.
RevidgeBlue Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 PNE: Lonegan, Gray, St. Ledger, Morgan, Davidson, Jones, Mayor, Coutts, C. Brown, Hayes, Treacy. Subs: W. Brown, Andreas, Dougan, McLaughlin, Miller, Douglas, Collins. Blackburn: Robinson, Salgado, Olsson, Jones, Chimbonda, Givet, Andrews, Dunn, Hoillet, Nzonzi, Pederson. Subs: Aley, Fielding, Branco, Marrow, Morris, Pearson, Potts, Judge. Good grief. A starting line up consisting of 5 defenders, three midfielders and two wingers. Uncle Jack must be spinning in his grave.
Anti-Dingle-Brigade Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 Whenever we win all our pre season games we usually get relegated or close to it. It matters not.
Paul Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 We are very poor. Nothing positive in the play and creating nothing. Awful
MarkBRFC71 Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 At PNE. Started 3-5-2, Olsson off injured and gone back to 4-5-1. No matter which formation, we've been dire. I know it's only a friendly but Andrews looks out of his depth, Hoilett is never going to be a Prem player, Chimbonda is still lazy, and although at least Pedersen is putting the effort in for a change, his delivery is as bad as ever. We look all over the place on the pitch, and things seem to be the same off it at present. Need to get the takeover sorted one way or another - the longer the uncertainty drags the more detrimental effect it's going to have on our season. BTW anyone know why Roberts isn't playing?
SIMON GARNERS 194 Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 Its' our away following you have to feel for tonight,thank god I changed my mind at the last minute! Why no recognised striker?
Paul Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 We are very poor. Nothing positive in the play and creating nothing. Awful
budha Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 BTW anyone know why Roberts isn't playing? I assume the likes of Roberts, Rigters, Hanley, Teymourian, Linganzi etc are going to feature tomorrow.
MarkBRFC71 Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 That moment against United at Ewood last season was brilliant especially the crechendo of noise when Pedersen picked the ball up for a throw Yeah, my missus could hear the groans of despair from Oakdale .... Oh, and Pedersen played well in about 3 games in the middle - the rest he was ploughing the depths of mediocrity.
CrazyIvan Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 Yeah, this game is crap. Playing Junior up front on his own is like putting your pants on outside your trousers, pointless and you look stupid... yep, pointless and we look utterly toothless and stupid. If you've got no strikers though... Yeah, this game is crap. Playing Junior up front on his own is like putting your pants on outside your trousers, pointless and you look stupid... yep, pointless and we look utterly toothless and stupid. If you've got no strikers though...
RevidgeBlue Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 Whenever we win all our pre season games we usually get relegated or close to it. It matters not. I seem to recall people saying the same thing before the World Cup when England were dire in the friendlies.
champions1995 Posted July 20, 2010 Posted July 20, 2010 As a few other posters have pointed out, pre season really does not give any indication on how the team or individual players are going to perform in the upcoming season. The game at League One side Huddersfield in 2007-08 pre season was the perfect example, as rovers were very poor that day and lost 2-1, but we still started the season with 1 defeat in our first 11 games and lost just 10 all season (our joint lowest number of defeats since our return to the top flight). It's incredibly frustrating when pre season results do not go as expected and performances are not to the required standard but it is not about results but a work-out for the players.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.