Guest Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 8 minutes ago, Butty said: Critchley compo money funded the Brannagan deal apparently… No chance they got over a mil in compo for Critchley. Quote
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
BankEnd Rover Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 9 minutes ago, Sweaty Gussets said: It was Nixon that got Brittain right. To be honest…Someone asked Nixon about Brannagan he said no, whilst the story was already out for him going to Blackpool. 2 Quote
Sweaty Gussets Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 2 minutes ago, BankEnd Rover said: To be honest…Someone asked Nixon about Brannagan he said no, whilst the story was already out for him going to Blackpool. And? Quote
Glosrover Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 36 minutes ago, Neal said: Nixon saying no truth in Bowler links. he's probably checking if Rovers made an approach for Jimmy Anderson 5 Quote
Lee0r Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 Just now, Glosrover said: he's probably checking if Rovers made an approach for Jimmy Anderson Wouldn’t want that Burnley ***** 1 Quote
Sweaty Gussets Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 2 minutes ago, Glosrover said: he's probably checking if Rovers made an approach for Jimmy Anderson 😃 Quote
Paul Mellelieu Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 26 minutes ago, Mellor Rover said: Also was the only journalist saying that we were'nt interested in Duncan Ferguson as our manager, broke the Brittain story first last week... just because he doesn't have a source at Rovers, doesn't mean he doesn't have one in an agent or at Blackpool. There's two clubs involved in a transfer deal... Probably more, if there is a chain of transfers involved. Quote
martonrover Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 Alan Nixon clearly has a source at Rovers, but even a source won’t provide 100% accurate information. It’s impossible to with transfers, as the picture will change all the time and a move can break down at any time until it’s signed and sealed. Also, interest in a player will not always be followed up by a firm bid. Nixon will report on interest, whereas the likes of Rich Sharpe only reports on what has happened and will not speculate. 2 Quote
roversinmyblood Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 2 hours ago, unleaded said: Looks a lightweight just like the last Liverpool player we had on loan …. The videos of him on YouTube are not very inspiring either. I wonder why our recruitment department would recommend him. Surely the purpose of loans is to sprinkle a bit of stardust into the team to take it to another level. I may be wrong but looks like another Clarkson to me. Quote
Sweaty Gussets Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 1 minute ago, martonrover said: Alan Nixon clearly has a source at Rovers, but even a source won’t provide 100% accurate information. It’s impossible to with transfers, as the picture will change all the time and a move can break down at any time until it’s signed and sealed. Also, interest in a player will not always be followed up by a firm bid. Nixon will report on interest, whereas the likes of Rich Sharpe only reports on what has happened and will not speculate. Halle fucking lujah. Quote
G Somerset Rover Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 (edited) Sharpe saying no news on Bowler too. Edited July 28, 2022 by Gavlar Somerset Rover! Quote
Neal Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 (edited) 30 minutes ago, Exiled_Rover said: Or maybe we don't value him at £1.25m (the current fee being bandied around on Twitter). Well, considering Rich Sharp said we had an interest, I'm guessing we were offering toffee's again. 1.25 for a player who scored quite a few goals from midfield in a position we need bodies doesn't seem too unreasonable. Either way, doesn't look good. Edited July 28, 2022 by Neal 1 Quote
BankEnd Rover Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Sweaty Gussets said: And? You questioned someone saying don’t trust Nixon…I’m saying that Nixon said he knew nothing about a player going to Blackpool even though there were reports of him going to Blackpool. So what I’m saying is Nixon doesn’t always know what’s going on. Edited July 28, 2022 by BankEnd Rover Quote
islander200 Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 7 minutes ago, Neal said: Well, considering Rich Sharp said we had an interest, I'm guessing we were offering toffee's again. 1.25 for a player who scored quite a few goals from midfield in a position we need bodies doesn't seem to unreasonable. Either way, doesn't look good. An interest doesn't mean a bid was made to be fair.Im sure there will be loads of players we have had an interest in Quote
Sweaty Gussets Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 3 minutes ago, BankEnd Rover said: Lol…you questioned someone saying don’t trust Nixon…I’m saying that Nixon said he knew nothing about a player going to Blackpool even though there were reports of him going to Blackpool. So what I’m saying is Nixon doesn’t always know what’s going on. No. You responded to me saying Nixon got Brittain right by saying 'yeah but he got Brannagan wrong'. Hence why I said 'And?' as it was irrelevant to the point I made. All I ever said was Nixon gets more Rovers stuff right than anyone else (at least in this window so far). I also agree he doesn't get everything right. The two aren't mutually exclusive. Fuck, this is hard work 😃 Quote
Guest Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 7 minutes ago, Neal said: Well, considering Rich Sharp said we had an interest, I'm guessing we were offering toffee's again. 1.25 for a player who scored quite a few goals from midfield in a position we need bodies doesn't seem too unreasonable. Either way, doesn't look good. I've interest in Emily Ratajkowski now she's split with her fella, doesn't mean I've done anything about it. To her detriment may I add. Quote
Guest Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 Just now, Sweaty Gussets said: No. You responded to me saying Nixon got Brittain right by saying 'yeah but he got Brannagan wrong'. Hence why I said 'And?' as it was irrelevant to the point I made. All I ever said was Nixon gets more Rovers stuff right than anyone else (at least in this window so far). I also agree he doesn't get everything right. The two aren't mutually exclusive. Fuck, this is hard work 😃 Welcome to BRFCS mate! Quote
Sweaty Gussets Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 1 minute ago, Mellor Rover said: I've interest in Emily Ratajkowski now she's split with her fella, doesn't mean I've done anything about it. To her detriment may I add. Her loss. Quote
BankEnd Rover Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 1 minute ago, Sweaty Gussets said: No. You responded to me saying Nixon got Brittain right by saying 'yeah but he got Brannagan wrong'. Hence why I said 'And?' as it was irrelevant to the point I made. All I ever said was Nixon gets more Rovers stuff right than anyone else (at least in this window so far). I also agree he doesn't get everything right. The two aren't mutually exclusive. Fuck, this is hard work 😃 Apologies…didn’t even bother reading the rest of your comment…Apologies Mr/Mrs Sweaty Gussets 1 Quote
tomphil Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 2 minutes ago, Mellor Rover said: I've interest in Emily Ratajkowski now she's split with her fella, doesn't mean I've done anything about it. To her detriment may I add. If you have a question to ask her then make an appointment to go see her, it's all the rage apparently. Quote
Sweaty Gussets Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 (edited) 4 minutes ago, BankEnd Rover said: Apologies…didn’t even bother reading the rest of your comment…Apologies Mr/Mrs Sweaty Gussets My pronoun is 'Super' 😉 And no apologies needed sir/madam. Maybe I should apologise. I've been reading your name as 'Backend Rover' Edited July 28, 2022 by Sweaty Gussets 1 Quote
Exiled_Rover Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 6 minutes ago, Mellor Rover said: I've interest in Emily Ratajkowski now she's split with her fella, doesn't mean I've done anything about it. To her detriment may I add. You can add her to TheRevAshton's "Shit anyway" list, for mine. Quote
rickard Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 8 minutes ago, Mellor Rover said: I've interest in Emily Ratajkowski now she's split with her fella, doesn't mean I've done anything about it. To her detriment may I add. Get in line mate! 😉 Quote
Mercer Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 (edited) Think Nixon is a marmite character and a tad maligned. He's actually quite likeable and very good company. Pros like Nixon forge relationships and 'look after' their contacts Think Sharpe is wet behind the ears and lacks the wherewithal and that's why he knows diddly squat. Edited July 28, 2022 by Mercer Quote
Ghost7 Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 17 minutes ago, Neal said: Well, considering Rich Sharp said we had an interest, I'm guessing we were offering toffee's again. 1.25 for a player who scored quite a few goals from midfield in a position we need bodies doesn't seem too unreasonable. Either way, doesn't look good. Yes and according to some fan theories, if we wait until the last week of the transfer window that £1.25m becomes 400k and doable. Remain calm, quality is coming but for cut-price deals thanks to our extreme patience in the market, apparently... 😂 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.