Premier League

[DeeCee]

13 hours ago, chaddyrovers said:

Spurs were terrible. didn't turn up. Frank got his team selection and tactics wrong today

Eze was fantastic and he should be the England squad for World Cup

I've been watching Palace more since AW joined and outside of him, Eze is my favourite prem player this season. Full of skill, strength and awareness.

Plus he's got a cool name and looks like the Predator. 😁

[RoverDom]

Amorim showing tactical flexibility to beat 10 man Everton over 80 mins 

[RevidgeBlue]

Anyone watching Chelsea v Arsenal?

Caiceido given an extremely harsh red by VAR imo. In real time was a fraction late with a studs down tackle and caught the Arsenal player on the top of the foot.

The ref (Anthony Taylor) gave a yellow onfield which was perfectly adequate imo but VAR as usual got involved un necessarily, and told him to go over to the monitor.

Of course it looked far worse in slow motion and Taylor upgraded to a red. When you compare that with the challenge on Baradji at Preston which caught him studs up half way up his calf/shin it's like watching 2 completely different sports.

 

[simongarnerisgod]

1 hour ago, RevidgeBlue said:

Anyone watching Chelsea v Arsenal?

Caiceido given an extremely harsh red by VAR imo. In real time was a fraction late with a studs down tackle and caught the Arsenal player on the top of the foot.

The ref (Anthony Taylor) gave a yellow onfield which was perfectly adequate imo but VAR as usual got involved un necessarily, and told him to go over to the monitor.

Of course it looked far worse in slow motion and Taylor upgraded to a red. When you compare that with the challenge on Baradji at Preston which caught him studs up half way up his calf/shin it's like watching 2 completely different sports.

 

var in this country has to many unqualified hands in the biscuit tin,just let the refs referee and use it for disputed penalties and/or goalline incidents,it`s used far to much for incidents referees should be deciding

[chaddyrovers]

red card all day long

[Tyrone Shoelaces]

1 hour ago, RevidgeBlue said:

Anyone watching Chelsea v Arsenal?

Caiceido given an extremely harsh red by VAR imo. In real time was a fraction late with a studs down tackle and caught the Arsenal player on the top of the foot.

The ref (Anthony Taylor) gave a yellow onfield which was perfectly adequate imo but VAR as usual got involved un necessarily, and told him to go over to the monitor.

Of course it looked far worse in slow motion and Taylor upgraded to a red. When you compare that with the challenge on Baradji at Preston which caught him studs up half way up his calf/shin it's like watching 2 completely different sports.

 

Or that tackle from behind that’s  put Tronstad out of our next few games.  That wasn’t  even deemed a foul, never mind a card.

[RevidgeBlue]

10 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

red card all day long

If it's a non contact sport.

[chaddyrovers]

16 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

If it's a non contact sport.

Its was a late and reckless tackle

[bazza]

22 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Its was a late and reckless tackle

It wasn't! He was going for the ball and his opponent got to it first. No card at all for me. Bloody cissies play-acting and rolling around on the ground when there's nowt wrong with them. These are the ones who should do 5 minutes in a sin bin.

And whilst I'm at it, when will a ref go over to the screen and come back and say," I was right in the first place" and stick to his original decision?

[CaptainBeanfart]

3 minutes ago, bazza said:

It Bloody cissies play-acting and rolling around on the ground when there's nowt wrong with them. 

This is a very weird take when it was Caicedo doing the rolling around to deflect attention from his bad tackle. The Arsenal player was fortunate to avoid injury, it looked painful. 

[bazza]

8 minutes ago, CaptainBeanfart said:

This is a very weird take when it was Caicedo doing the rolling around to deflect attention from his bad tackle. The Arsenal player was fortunate to avoid injury, it looked painful. 

I meant in general with that remark; not specific.

[chaddyrovers]

1 hour ago, bazza said:

It wasn't! He was going for the ball and his opponent got to it first. No card at all for me. Bloody cissies play-acting and rolling around on the ground when there's nowt wrong with them. These are the ones who should do 5 minutes in a sin bin.

And whilst I'm at it, when will a ref go over to the screen and come back and say," I was right in the first place" and stick to his original decision?

Late and reckless. Always a red card. Never getting the ball in a month of Sundays 

[47er]

2 hours ago, simongarnerisgod said:

var in this country has to many unqualified hands in the biscuit tin,just let the refs referee and use it for disputed penalties and/or goalline incidents,it`s used far to much for incidents referees should be deciding

And off-sides, though even that's gone crazy---5 minutes to decide it was a hairs' breadth in it!.

[London blue]

Reckless? Please.

He was late to the ball. Unfortunately the fellas foot was where it was. 

Yellow.