2025 Summer Transfer Thread. 😂

[RevidgeBlue]

9 minutes ago, RoversClitheroe said:

Surely if he isn't going to get a game then why not just sign a coach?

I don't get this signing.

Terrible terrible signing

100 % agreed. Money is tight and we're spaffing it away on Forshaw.

Surely the money could be far better spent.

What next? Cauley Woodrow?

 

[Emerald Isle Rover]

I said the same about Eustace and I double down on it with Val. Iv zero sympathy for him he has to have known about rovers financial struggles and off field issues. He accepted all of this when he signed 

[Mercer]

Forshaw????

Feck me.  No, no, no ..........

Pasha, Gestede, Raos - get the feck out of our club.

[RevidgeBlue]

4 minutes ago, Emerald Isle Rover said:

I said the same about Eustace and I double down on it with Val. Iv zero sympathy for him he has to have known about rovers financial struggles and off field issues. He accepted all of this when he signed 

People used to accuse Eustace of this and I felt that if he had specifically been told "We know what happened with JDT but don't worry it won't happen again" then he was entitled to take that at face value until proven otherwise.

However, now that it's happened TWICE I have a very hard time believing that VI could be naive to all this or that he isn't fully complicit and agreeable to anything that happens as long as he draws his salary.

[Tom]

An average player these days but I’m not too concerned in isolation, it was always going to happen at some point. 
 

The worry is what it’s a sign of

[pick32]

Don’t mind it if he isn’t starting 11

[K-Hod]

55 minutes ago, JBiz said:

His contract would’ve run till 30th of June 

Was only a joke mate, don’t take it so hard.

[yankfan]

The most concerning part of the Forshaw signing is he very well could be here to take the place of Travis when he’s shipped off to Wrexham 

[roversfan99]

I dont get this idea that its fine as long as he isnt for the first team.

We repeatedly have issues in the second half of the season with squad depth. Our squad players are massive downgrades and when they have prolonged periods in the team, which will likely happen at some stage, results drop off.

Its all well and good thinking he will be useful to see games out etc but thats assuming everyone is fit 46 games a season.

[Emerald Isle Rover]

15 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

People used to accuse Eustace of this and I felt that if he had specifically been told "We know what happened with JDT but don't worry it won't happen again" then he was entitled to take that at face value until proven otherwise.

However, now that it's happened TWICE I have a very hard time believing that VI could be naive to all this or that he isn't fully complicit and agreeable to anything that happens as long as he draws his salary.

I disagree on the Eustace stance. Out dirty laundry was aired publicly for all to see regarding the court case / struggling finances etc well before Eustace too the role. A quick search that any person can do would show the failed windows we have had, the failure of duty of care for some players we messed about all on top of what was already obvious re venkys so ANY manager taking us they should have done their due diligence and if they have and still accept the role then they can’t be surprised  

[roversfan99]

Also on Forshaw. Its telling that we didnt give him a new deal straight away. An act of desperation to then go back.

[Tomphil2]

According to some they did offer him a deal but he wanted to see if there was anything else.

Not exactly a ringing endorsement.

[RevidgeBlue]

13 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

Also on Forshaw. Its telling that we didnt give him a new deal straight away. An act of desperation to then go back.

Exactly.

[davulsukur]

"He's just a back up"

"He's just a squad player"

"He's cheap"

"He won't be playing much"

A signing that shows nothing but a real lack of ambition or forward planning and just further evidence of cost cutting.

[Wing Wizard Windy Miller]

1 hour ago, ... said:

Forshaw is a ridiculous signing

 

 

We all said he'd be back.  Most people just thought they would leave  it till the end of the window before sneaking him in.  You know, after a semi-positive signing.  

But no.

 The fact he's being touted as a a 'signing' is hilarious.  They're openly taking the piss at Ewood.

 

  

[RevidgeBlue]

Chaddy must be locked in his war bunker discussing furiously with his Press Secretary how to spin this signing.

I'm Predicting:

"Pleased with this signing. A good dollop of experience to help the younger players".

🙂

[DutchRover]

Pathetic decision and shows exactly how far we've gone. We can't even resign Batth but Forshaw presumably costs peanuts in comparison.

[DutchRover]

Smacks of mates rates by Gestede too, giving his crocked Boro teammate another year for god know what reason.

[roversfan99]

6 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

Chaddy must be locked in his war bunker discussing furiously with his Press Secretary how to spin this signing.

I'm Predicting:

"Pleased with this signing. A good dollop of experience to help the younger players".

🙂

It will be "Ismael wanted the signing" and then questioning anyone by saying "dont you want Ismael to have final say."

Not realising or purposefully missing the fact that you can believe that the manager should have final say AND sometimes disagree with his choices.

[Forever Blue]

29 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

Chaddy must be locked in his war bunker discussing furiously with his Press Secretary how to spin this signing.

I'm Predicting:

"Pleased with this signing. A good dollop of experience to help the younger players".

🙂

It would be fair assessment, but clearly not one you agree with. 

Then again, CM’s aren’t your strong point so  maybe young Chadster’s presumed assessment is accurate 😉

[M_B]

2 hours ago, Forever Blue said:

In isolation, Forshaw for an extra year isn’t a bad signing. He actually looked decent in patches late on in the season. He’s a good player to bring on as he’s composed on the ball.  He also wasn’t half as bad as people made out and I’m sure with a good pre-season behind him he’ll look sharper still. 

The problem is if he is a direct replacement for either Trav or Tron. In that context it’s just another cost-cutting exercise, but on a an even bigger level of stupidity.

We’ll see how the CM positions look at the end of the window to see the context. 

Spot on, if he's first or second replacement, then OK signing. If he's a starter, then obviously not.

As you say, the longer the season went on, the better he got, which shouldn't be a surprise given he hadn't been playing at Plymouth.

It also looks like a signing with Ismael's blessing to me, which bodes well going forward. 

[RoverDom]

Doesn't even make sense on a pay to play contract - where he is paying us to play. 

[Rover1984]

No doubt next signing will be Woodrow 😔

[TimmyJimmy]

Forshaw signing is OK for me if he's an "as well as ..." but not if he's an "instead of ...". So if we sign others (of quality) and keep hold of Trav/Tron then his dressing room presence/experience will be useful.

The reality is of course that we don't sign quality and we lose Trav so if that was to be the case then this is another low water mark moment.

As an aside I like Garrett, he has attitude. Hope he has an impressive pre season and breaks through (oh and he's free so in the current climate what the heck).

[...]

1 hour ago, Wing Wizard Windy Miller said:

We all said he'd be back.  Most people just thought they would leave  it till the end of the window before sneaking him in.  You know, after a semi-positive signing.  

But no.

 The fact he's being touted as a a 'signing' is hilarious.  They're openly taking the piss at Ewood.

 

  

Mate my pants are already down and I'm handing my money over as we speak