Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Lancaster Rover said:

I can understand the standpoint of contracts for players over 30 however there needs to be some consideration to games played at the level of(or comparable). We have an average age of 26.5, which is right in the middle of the champ average squad age. 25 years olds who've played a lot of games are great, however I'd prefer a 32 year old with 400 games over a 21 year old with 20 when considering the nature of the championship. I'm sure Gestede, etc will point to data, ceilings, etc but the one thing with football data is good analysts also use context and most importantly their eyes. 

I listened to an excellent podcast last week with the Head of Recruitment at Coventry, Dean Austin. He was highlighting the importance of context and using what you see in front of you with data playing a supporting role. He gave an anecdote of a player from overseas Coventry were all in on, so much so he went over to do a physical scouting exercise. The data on the player was all there, ticked every box. Going over was seen as merely due diligence and confirmation on what was going to be a big outlay. He watched 2 games and 2 training sessions and went from being all in to all out. Because no matter what the data was telling him, his eyes saw something different. And herein lies the problem with Gestede, Suhail et al they seem to be working purely on data and looking for a certain profile of player (i.e. age, height, running stats, recoveries, etc) and not taking into account contextual factors. 

 

Know they had scout out watching a right winger this week in Europe .. who was flagged up on the data system .. so the same process is being done… We have data scouts & physical scouts who do the due diligence part of it ….  

Ismael was right to answer the question instead of giving a robot answer regarding Travis how he saw it .. players & agents hide behind microphones and play the fans then 6 months later are leaving on frees ….if the best contract a club can offer is not acceptable then cash in … We do exactly the same to other clubs and sign their players…

  • Like 10
  • Disagree 4
Posted
54 minutes ago, KentExile said:

I would suspect that his post Rovers career will follow a similar path & trajectory to Owen Coyle & the Odious One

 

Managerial career
2003 Falkirk
2005–2007 St Johnstone
2007–2010 Burnley
2010–2012 Bolton Wanderers
2013 Wigan Athletic
2014–2016 Houston Dynamo
2016–2017 Blackburn Rovers
2017–2018 Ross County
2019–2020 Chennaiyin
2020–2022 Jamshedpur
2022–2023 Queen's Park
2023–2025

Chennaiyin

 

Managerial career
2010–2012 Blackburn Rovers
2013–2017 DPMM FC
2014 Brunei
2021 Melbourne Victory
2023– Torpedo Kutaisi

Whilst this may well end up being the case, he is at a far earlier stage of his post player career than Coyle who had failed elsewhere. Kean is a different kettle of fish.

His signings have yet to be proven as rubbish especially given that (presumably) he is doing as he is told regarding available finance for players.

Posted
8 minutes ago, unleaded said:

Know they had scout out watching a right winger this week in Europe .. who was flagged up on the data system .. so the same process is being done… We have data scouts & physical scouts who do the due diligence part of it ….  

Ismael was right to answer the question instead of giving a robot answer regarding Travis how he saw it .. players & agents hide behind microphones and play the fans then 6 months later are leaving on frees ….if the best contract a club can offer is not acceptable then cash in … We do exactly the same to other clubs and sign their players…

It’s more and more common. Preston mate of mine was talking me about Emil Riis.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, unleaded said:

Know they had scout out watching a right winger this week in Europe .. who was flagged up on the data system .. so the same process is being done… We have data scouts & physical scouts who do the due diligence part of it ….  

Ismael was right to answer the question instead of giving a robot answer regarding Travis how he saw it .. players & agents hide behind microphones and play the fans then 6 months later are leaving on frees ….if the best contract a club can offer is not acceptable then cash in … We do exactly the same to other clubs and sign their players…

You seem (not from this post, in general) very pro Gestede, pro signing these randomers from here there and everywhere on the cheap from abroad, and have regularly gone out of your way to criticise Eustace both as a person and his approach, as well as any players leaving.

Do you not have any concerns about the fact we cant agree any deals for seasoned and proven quality Championship players, and at where the club is heading?

If what you have said is true, why are we still identifying and scouting players when we should already have sorted this key signing. 

  • Like 8
Posted
Just now, JBiz said:

It’s more and more common. Preston mate of mine was talking me about Emil Riis.

Sometimes it does happen and it is unavoidable. Take Armstrong, a youngish attacking player, had outgrown the club, understandable that we couldnt keep him. (Shame we didnt reinvest ANY of that money)

The problem here is that we cant agree deals at all. Its certainly not isolated examples. There is a clear desire to get rid of these players. They arent offered deals proactively, and we will not offer them reasonable Championship wages. 1 deal in nearly 2 years.

  • Like 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

You seem (not from this post, in general) very pro Gestede, pro signing these randomers from here there and everywhere on the cheap from abroad, and have regularly gone out of your way to criticise Eustace both as a person and his approach, as well as any players leaving.

Do you not have any concerns about the fact we cant agree any deals for seasoned and proven quality Championship players, and at where the club is heading?

If what you have said is true, why are we still identifying and scouting players when we should already have sorted this key signing. 

Couldn’t agree more - our priority position of a right winger should have been in weeks ago

  • Like 6
Posted
12 minutes ago, unleaded said:

Ismael was right to answer the question instead of giving a robot answer regarding Travis how he saw it .. players & agents hide behind microphones and play the fans then 6 months later are leaving on frees ….if the best contract a club can offer is not acceptable then cash in …

I just don't get this viewpoint at all. Why would you want your manager throwing your captain under the bus? Unless he's an arse that everyone, players included, want out of the club it just breeds a toxic environment. 

Knowing your manager will just call you out in public isn't exactly going to endear him to the rest of the squad. If I was Hyam or Tronstad I'd just keep my mouth shut. No point talking to the manager to work out a mutually beneficial outcome, he might try to make the fans hate me. Sod him, I'll just keep clear of injury and go on a free.

It's called (a lack of) psychological safety, and it's naive management at best.

  • Like 4
Posted

Just to find something positive to say... watched the Bradford game back and Tavares has real world cup winner N'Zonzi vibes. Really like the look of him. Also Miller looks very good, will land well and fit right in.  McCloughlin looks like he knows what he is doing.

Not so convinced on Alebiousu, De Neve, Henricksson, . Plus Gueye is getting worse and worse. We need three of those four to come good.

  • Like 2
  • Backroom
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, RoversClitheroe said:

Reminds me of JDT scenario.

Trying to think of another example in modern times, at this sort of level, where a manager has literally been stopped from attending a press conference due to his alleged incandescent anger over the incompetence of the people he's working with. To be a fly on the walls of Ewood on that day. 

Edited by DE.
  • Like 6
Posted
11 minutes ago, MarkBRFC said:

Elliot saying that Rovers have blocked any talk of Lewis Travis or contracts in general at todays press conference.

Joke of a setup.

Like full on Soviet Union. Any topics the Regime isn't comfortable with are banned. Any comments at the Fans Forum they don't like simply omitted from the minutes. 

So much for Gestede and his 'communication' spiel. Sounds good but no real intention of delivering it.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, MarkBRFC said:

Elliot saying that Rovers have blocked any talk of Lewis Travis or contracts in general at todays press conference.

Joke of a setup.

"Open, honest, transparent"

Edited by TugaysMarlboro
  • Like 5
Posted

Wonder if Jackson will still be praising the 'openness and honesty' of Ismael whilst at the same time being banned from asking questions about the most important topics at the club right now.

If he had anything about him he'd walk out of the room and refuse to report on the topics Rovers want covering. 

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, MarkBRFC said:

Elliot saying that Rovers have blocked any talk of Lewis Travis or contracts in general at todays press conference.

Joke of a setup.

Like Trump & Putin’s summit in Alaska ruling out mentioning Ukraine…

  • Like 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, MarkBRFC said:

Elliot saying that Rovers have blocked any talk of Lewis Travis or contracts in general at todays press conference.

Joke of a setup.

He should ask those questions anyway.

If his story becomes the club not answering his questions then so be it.

  • Like 7
Posted
13 minutes ago, JHRover said:

Like full on Soviet Union. Any topics the Regime isn't comfortable with are banned. Any comments at the Fans Forum they don't like simply omitted from the minutes. 

So much for Gestede and his 'communication' spiel. Sounds good but no real intention of delivering it.

Never forget WATR welcoming him like a legend.

Posted
2 minutes ago, JHRover said:

Wonder if Jackson will still be praising the 'openness and honesty' of Ismael whilst at the same time being banned from asking questions about the most important topics at the club right now.

If he had anything about him he'd walk out of the room and refuse to report on the topics Rovers want covering. 

As much as many of us would like to think we'd take the moral high ground, for him it's his livelihood to support his family. I doubt his time at the LT and LancsLive has provided such a financial build up that he can tell them to sling it and abandon his job. 

Posted

Tight news management and all awkward questions banned. Trump's Maga regime alive and well at Ewood. 

How did it come to this? 

  • Like 2
Posted

What the local journo's should do is quite simple 'Ok Mr Ismael fair enough' then turn straight to the club and say right where is Mr Gestede he is director of these operations and these questions are for him to answer, if he doesn't we'll have to concoct our own headlines and he may not like it'.

Makes me boil that just casually batting things off means that nobody is accountable, someone is always accountable for every action.

Get after the root of it.

  • Like 6

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.