v Hull City (a) - 23/8/25

[Tyrone Shoelaces]

1 hour ago, ... said:

Any news on Tavares? 

Yeah, he can’t take a corner.

[davulsukur]

16 hours ago, chaddyrovers said:

his wages are out of reach of us. 

Surely Hull can only pay £10k per week max under their financial restrictions?

[...]

36 minutes ago, Tyrone Shoelaces said:

Yeah, he can’t take a corner.

Hahaha what a numpty

Albebisou and news on Him? Ffs 🤣🤣🤣

[Lancaster Rover]

1 hour ago, ... said:

Any news on Tavares? 

He can't tackle that's for sure, his inability to step in or even divert players played a huge role in both goals.

[...]

1 hour ago, Lancaster Rover said:

He can't tackle that's for sure, his inability to step in or even divert players played a huge role in both goals.

I know I meant Alebiosou 🤣😆

[DE.]

2 hours ago, davulsukur said:

Surely Hull can only pay £10k per week max under their financial restrictions?

Chaddy's probably still correct tbh. 

[RevidgeBlue]

The **** might hit the fan if/when we lose this one surely even the owners and management might sit up and take notice that we're rooted pointless to the bottom of the table after 3 games and just been beaten by a team under embargo.

[lraC]

4 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

The **** might hit the fan if/when we lose this one surely even the owners and management might sit up and take notice that we're rooted pointless to the bottom of the table after 3 games and just been beaten by a team under embargo.

It might, but I bet it won't. 

[...]

Big chance to change the narrative (atleast the one on the pitch) this weekend and start some momentumn. 

Same XI to start in Hull. 

Rovers 1-0

[Tomphil2]

Another battle of oddball ownership.

Tigers  1   Toothless 0

 

[RevidgeBlue]

Not that I am endorsing backing against the team but if you were a neutral gambler looking for value it's been a licence to print money backing us to lose recently.

West Brom weren't far shy of evens, God knows what price Bradford were, Birmingham 13/10, Hull 11/10.

[KentExile]

4 hours ago, davulsukur said:

Surely Hull can only pay £10k per week max under their financial restrictions?

Both Hull and Sheffield Wednesday are now under a "fee restriction" rather than a full embargo, Pretty sure "fee restrictions" only impact transfer/compensation/loan fees, not what wages they can offer

https://www.efl.com/governance/embargoes/

[Tyrone Shoelaces]

10 minutes ago, KentExile said:

Both Hull and Sheffield Wednesday are now under a "fee restriction" rather than a full embargo, Pretty sure "fee restrictions" only impact transfer/compensation/loan fees, not what wages they can offer

https://www.efl.com/governance/embargoes/

We’re under a fee and wage restriction.

[SIMON GARNERS 194]

2 hours ago, RevidgeBlue said:

The **** might hit the fan if/when we lose this one surely even the owners and management might sit up and take notice that we're rooted pointless to the bottom of the table after 3 games and just been beaten by a team under embargo.

Wont make a ripple back at Pune Towers..they dont give a shyte.

[joey_big_nose]

Much as it was a horror last ten minutes against Birmingham I think we should select the same side. It looked defensively solid until the subs. Not much going forward but I can't really see what changes in the XI we would make to address that.

One small adjustment I would make is to swap Kargbo and Ohashi round from time to time. Let Kargbo sit on the last man and roam around. I guess the downside is the ball could not stick, even more so than with Ohashi, but I would like to see the speed demon free to run through the middle.

Rotating Ohashi and Kargbo frequently in the game could be quite effective in unsettling the defenders and making them unsure whether to push up (to compress Ohashi) or drop deep (to prevent the ball over the top to Kargbo).

[RevidgeBlue]

7 minutes ago, SIMON GARNERS 194 said:

Wont make a ripple back at Pune Towers..they dont give a shyte.

Maybe not......although I wonder if anyone has told them how much income we'd lose if we went down yet.

[KentExile]

1 hour ago, Tyrone Shoelaces said:

We’re under a fee and wage restriction.

self inflicted & self imposed though 

Edited 1 hour ago by KentExile

[Tyrone Shoelaces]

39 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

Maybe not......although I wonder if anyone has told them how much income we'd lose if we went down yet.

They’d just cut back on expenditure. They’re way past caring now, if they ever cared in the first place. We’re just a broken toy.

[Tomphil2]

If we ever had a head coach who was good at subs and game management it would gain another 5-10 points per season.

Always get the impression that getting players on the pitch to gain mins and increase in value sometimes trumps common sense reactions to what's actually going on out there and occasionally its bitten us on the arse.

[KentExile]

8 minutes ago, Tomphil2 said:

If we ever had a head coach who was good at subs and game management it would gain another 5-10 points per season.

Always get the impression that getting players on the pitch to gain mins and increase in value sometimes trumps common sense reactions to what's actually going on out there and occasionally its bitten us on the arse.

Eustace seemed to do ok with that in the first half of last season.  

[Tomphil2]

1 minute ago, KentExile said:

Eustace seemed to do ok with that in the first half of last season.  

He was the best one i can recall in recent times although i think JDT did ok at first.

Thing is with Eustace he wasn't listening to the club rhetoric he was only really bothered about results, hence why they wanted rid.