Having read quotes from him in the LT I'm both encouraged and discouraged. Discouraged if he thinks we're a premier league set up - from our joke owners who don't communicate and take an age on decisions, to a director of football (which doesn't work in the UK) who is pretty incompetent with conflicting interests to a budget of a league 1 team there is nothing premier league about our set up. He's in for a nasty shock on this score. Or he's stupidly naive. However he spent Thursday working on defensive shape which shows he has more of a grasp of what's going on than Clueless did. The fact some of it was new to the players is damning pf the previous regime but gives me optimism we can shore things up. Overall I feel he'll keep us up before running afoul of our owners and failing when the next round of budget cuts kick in.

Positives: He is an actual manager with experience at numerous clubs. He seems an honest bloke. He has worked for numpties before. He literally must be able to organize a defense more. Negatives: There's not too many successes really - WBA, Hibs (?) but the rest are a really mixed bag - Boro, Coventry and Celtic weren't by any means successes, and I'd struggle to say were indifferent spells. . His record at Coventry in particular - a situation very similar to ours - wasn't great which is worrying. He doesn't have his own team. Most of all he's head coach. That means Senior is calling the shots. I think Senior is both clueless and has conflicts of interest which mean whoever the manager is they're really going to be handicapped by the structure. Also there's a world of difference between being a good manager and a good bloke. It's only because we've had some real characters at Rovers that this has even become a criteria. Not sure Big Sam is a good bloke BUT he is a good manager. Had we not had two of the best liars in the business as managers who would really care how nice a chap he was? A lot of the positive feeling is Venkys could do worse. Rationally though, without this fear factor, for a Championship club fighting relegation, it is not a great appointment. With any half decent ownership/executive structure I'd imagine people would be a lot more disappointed- hence why he wasn't on any fans wanted list. Sure our situation is relevant but actually so is the fact we're a championship club and should be acting as one is also relevant. Overall not wild about the appointment - hope however he proves me wrong.

Yesterdays game shows why we've a decent chance of staying up regardless of Coyle. There's enough dross in this division that a few refereeing mistakes and teams not on their game and we will pick up points. Despite their recent wins as well I still have big doubts over Bristol Forest Burton and Wigan to name a few, as to whether they will pick up points with more consistency than us.

Think that's overly positive tbh and posted as much in the Coyle out thread. Feeney as ok after a couple of games blowing hot and cold is a stretch as is Hoban being excellent in a leaky defence. My main gripe is money not spent well especially on a bunch of crocks. Hoban and Mulgrew may well be good players - and am not convinced about the former - but when they miss half the season through injury it doesn't matter how good they are. They could be as bad as me or as good as Messi - when they're out injured it's irrelevant as either way they're not contributing. There's also planning issues - like all 4 cb and 3 cms all being crocks and holes in certain positions but will leave it there. Not a great bit of summer business

Another week goes by and I still think we'll get out of it by the skin of our teeth. Didn't see Wigan putting up this much of a fight but then didn't see Bristol City imploding like they have. My main thought is we cam still scrape a few points together, something that Burton, Bristol and Rotherham look incapable of doing.

You know what, the more I see and hear of us, the more I think staying up wouldn't be too much of a problem IF we had a decent manager. We're scoring lots of goals, bar yesterday, and have some decent players for this division. Any manager with a modicum of organisation could get the 3-2s against in to draws and wins. Also with a better fitness regime, perhaps good but crocked players like Mulgrew and Evans might feature more (though I am less optimistic on this). Add in to which there are so many poor teams in this division and so many unexpected results that the bar is so, so low for staying up. Yes we're crap, but then Burton, Wigan and Rotherham aren't any good - and Wigan have done us a favour in appointing a poor manager. Birmingham and Forrest look like they could implode as well. There's a chance, through other teams self-destruction rather than any merit on our part, that we can still stay up. We don't have to be good, only less bad then 3 other teams. I believe with a change of manager, given what's at our disposal, 4th from bottom is quite attainable. So the big question remains what is plan V? If it's to run us cheaply as possible in this division, then a change of manager should soon be forthcoming to preserve league status. However, if as I fear Coyle is here for the duration as part of plan asset strip, then the above optimism goes out the window. He clearly cannot organise a team to be successful, even from positive and solid positions. Bugger, I've just talked myself out of my optimism. Think the point is though it's another "if only" scenario. If only we had a different manager, staying up would be a real possibility.

To me there are three criteria for a worst player: 1 be a poor talent for the level at which we are playing. In fairness to the current shower few would have been looked at in happier days, in any division, so all players to be ranked in the league/situation we were in. 2 have a significant negative impact on the team. One or two appearances doesn't really do much damage to us or deserve notoriety. Nor does a few ineffective sub appearances. Besides a mistake quickly rectified isn't that much of a problem. 3 statistically do badly for us. We've all seen a few clodhoppers in our time but sometimes they can be effective, even if not very talented or appealing to watch. In light of this I've narrowed it down to two players: Alan Fettis Chris Brown Oh we've had a bunch of other talentless gofers. Douglas always annoyed me in his left mid days but the team did grind out points. Andrews was poor but versatile and got a number of goals. Lowe is the worst captain I've ever seen but in very familiar company. Best was a huge expensive mistake and a prime pillock but got a few goals. And Matteo whilst a horrible footballer helped us be resilient under Hughes. Fettis and Brown however simply couldn't do anything like what they were meant to do, fans lost all hope when the ball got near them and were poor excuses for footballers. Both sadly got a lot more game time then they ever deserved and comfortably deserve this accolade Imo.

Didn't the Netherlands u21 manager select players for a system that worked rather than the most talented? Seem to remember reading something of that ilk at the time.

The next 5 games are a killer and has the potential to see us adrift with Rotherham. We'll get nothing out of Villa and the barcodes, whilst Huddersfield on their day can be very good too (despite their recent tonking.) That means realistically that we have to get wins from Brentford and/or Preston to keep any kind of momentum. But that's a tough ask given both are in better form than us, and with better managers - if not better squads. Brentford's win vs. QPR makes me a tad worried they'll do the same to us putting a ton of pressure on the Preston game. I reckon 4 to 5 points is about right from these games. Think it'll be 5 as the championship is wonderfully inconsistent and we'll catch someone on a bad day. The only consolation imo is that the teams around us could well get similar amount of points from their fixtures, so even such a poor return could be ok for us. A lot of if buts and maybes but that's what we're reduced to.

Amazingly we're still not adrift, and in a much better position than Rotherham. There are also some pretty rank bad teams in this division - Ipswich, Wolves - the wrong managerial appointment in either one (sacking McCarthy may happen with fan unrest) could give them a good downward push. Mind you, it's a poor do when you're best hope of survival is other clubs imploding in a worse manner than yourselves.

1 They are head and shoulders above anyone else we're likely to recruit under Venkys. 2 A good manager with a good team can get capitalize on players strengths, hide their weaknesses and get the total being more than the sum of it's parts. Not that we have that manager mind.

Not sure what you guys are all on about. According to the club, if not science such as line of sight and such trifles, there is no obstruction whatsoever to the pitch or game...

Excellent move - first positive move of the summer. The difference between this sort of signing and the previous is the difference of proven quality vs hopeful. Can't believe 8 years ago watching Carlisle I would be chuffed that Graham had signed for us. Times change. Now if only we could be rid of the manager, owner and external influences on the club. Then it'd be a very good day. And we still need another couple of quality forwards to support Graham. But for once we've made a positive step.

Because they have a very good manager (my first shout for the Rovers job). Let's be honest they're a league 1 club, and sooner or later their finances size and resources will mean they're struggling at the wrong end of the table. I've no doubt that the board will then panic and Grayson will be told to pack his bags. But a fair assessment is that keeping them in this league is a success story for them. Where they are currently is a massive success for them, and shows that Grayson not being able to hack it in the Championship is incorrect.

Bit harsh Imo - rotherham, Bolton, Huddersfield, Bristol, MK Dons, Preston all have weaker teams Imo. Although I'd have been more certain of that at the start of the season! Plus you've the basket case clubs like Leeds which also are odds on to implode. A bit of consistency and this league is there for the taking.

Realistically at 8 points clear - possibly more with the game in hand - the bottom 3 need to win 3 without us picking up any points to overtake us.(I say 3 wins as our goal difference massively helps.) personally I can't see the bottom 3 all doing that nor us not grinding out some more points - draws if not wins. It may not be pretty or what we hoped for from this season but I'm confident we'll be in this division next year. Too many poor teams and now too big a barrier for them to climb.

If you did, I imagined it too. Great goal, quality player, who couldn't settle.

Didn't he do well at Swansea but then bomb at Leicester? Or am I thinking of a completely different chap? Could've worked, as the Leicester mishap was at the time they got through a lot of managers, whilst all bar the best managers have a blip at some point in their career. He can't be too bad if he's now managing in Serie A.

But that doesn't necessarily mean they are worse managers. Comparatively when you factor in squad quality, length of time in the role, wage budget, transfer budget and numbers brought in,prestige of club for attracting players I don't think Bowyer comes out very well. the Anyway back on topic after an EXCELLENT win at the weekend to me the relegation scramble is shaping up similar to what imagined. The promoted teams are struggling, and Bolton and Rotherham look like they've nowhere near enough to stay up. All in all I still reckon we'll be safe. You've teams like us and Huddersfield who have a bit of quality but can also be very fragile. If we/they show more of the fragility than the quality then they'll get sucked in but there's enough teams down there to keep us safe. A poor start, only one win, and we're out of the relegation zone, which speaks volumes for the quality of the league.

Also both Gresko and Peltzer got bad injuries which hampered the team, whilst Gresko also had to cope with the worst set of stand in left midfielders ever, which didn't help his cause.

Judging from how we've been doing, I can well believe round Brockhall way this is an original thought. Good to see the PR defense machine in full working order...

Stuart my expectations have not been changed by bowyer - with the quality of the league and the players we have midtable is where we should be aiming for. As with th e last few years bowyer knocks off about 4/5 places from where we should be, minimum. Think we'll stay up in spite of not because of bowyer and he should be potted for not getting the team playing anywhere near uts potential even before you consider the relegation issue.

I grant you it's not a certainty rev but we've both seen many of our players performing better than they currently have and I've not seen much in this league to br scared of. We're our own worst enemy sometimes. I've explained all my reasoning on an earlier post although I admit relying on a tight league and some other poor teams is a bad way to go. I want bowyer gone, have done for ages, but I also feel by luck or ability - probably the former - we'll scrape enough points to survive.

Good point. Even so they had to have some reason/grounds for suggesting the sackings, to convince venkys to do so. Hence one reason I think he'll eventually go. Don't get me wrong I've been unhappy with bowyer for a long time and have often raised his flaws. Nor do I think we'll do well this season. Just that we won't get relegated this season.

Well no one can be 100% certain but think they're not under the poisonous influence that kept Kean in a job, but since then when we've looked like relegation or performing badly (as oppose to underperforming) they've sacked managers quickly. Also whatever plan they have their exit strategy or whatever it is cannot be served by going down to league 1.