Crimpshrine Posted yesterday at 15:00 Posted yesterday at 15:00 21 hours ago, pk1875 said: Strange departures from non playing staff, experienced players suddenly being moved on without being offered contracts. Young cheap inexperienced "Yes" players being brought in. We've trodden this path before in the dark days of SEM Kentaro and Anderson. Now were left with two men running the club.. Suhail Pasha, who was SEM from day one Rudy Gestede who worked closely with Steve Kean in Australia.. Maybe, just maybe its not over yet... They aren't trying to hide their policy of putting cost cutting before all else. They have cut off all contact with the fan groups and removed any players with any affinity for the fans or the club. They are whittling away at the old guard ( Waggott, Lowe etc ) until they ( Pasha and Gestede ) have complete autonomy to do as their friends in low places desire them to do. My only hope is that it all seems so obvious and brazen that it might be a one final fling before they finally leave us in peace. 9 Quote
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Tomphil2 Posted yesterday at 15:14 Posted yesterday at 15:14 (edited) It won't, they are taking these measures of almost self administered admin to stop it actually ending up in admin where they'd then surely lose the club but maybe still have a 100 million quid overdraft in India to be liable for. They are digging in to cling on to the grim end wherever we end up and only something major with the investigation or whatever will alter that imo. The 'model' they are now trying will have been recommended to them by the usual suspects who stand to do very nice out of it indeed. Edited yesterday at 15:15 by Tomphil2 7 1 Quote
OllieNO Posted yesterday at 18:43 Posted yesterday at 18:43 The «model» is a death spiral - no way they’ll attract the same talent again (as recent sales) with the limited levels of spending we are seeing now. Pasha possibly understands this(?), but as long as he can keep the lights on he’ll continue to make a fortune for a few more years (where else would he get x100k per year? Don’t forget - 500k x 10 years = 5 mill). As long as the overlords in India don’t interfere he’s good👍 3 Quote
John Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago Only read some snippets of exchanges between Gestede and fans - Gestede comes across like a smug / ignorant / arrogant **** or is it just me? Totally defensive on any criticism and in an attempt to justify decision making. Not a good look and seems petty. 3 Quote
Tomphil2 Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 36 minutes ago, OllieNO said: The «model» is a death spiral - no way they’ll attract the same talent again (as recent sales) with the limited levels of spending we are seeing now. Pasha possibly understands this(?), but as long as he can keep the lights on he’ll continue to make a fortune for a few more years (where else would he get x100k per year? Don’t forget - 500k x 10 years = 5 mill). As long as the overlords in India don’t interfere he’s good👍 No wonder he sneers from the shadows. 1 Quote
Nipper1875 Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago Well well the worm is wriggling around now and starting to come out in daylight - we have another jerome anderson here- beleive me now this season is going to be worse than the kean era - Gestede calling everything around the club thinks he is the main man Harry leonard questioning him with his approach to academy players and staff - he was ment to go bradford on loan instead gestede put feelers out to get him gone for questioning rudy - something whats learnt in the academy TO ASK QUESTIONS Jake batty another one - accrington stanley told a price for another loan season everything sorted then rudy get his nose poked in disagrees stops the deal and offers him out to other clubs at a different wage bracket cover 100% These academy lads arent getting the senior game time they need over rudy thinking about wages instead Pears disagreeing with gestede now been frozen right out the club Travis questioning things just like sonny is now booted out - Its beyond a dam joke that us supporters put up with this shite - its time for some balls make the enviroment horrible for him we look after our own remember he screwed the club as a player the shithead now he is trying to do the same 6 Quote
lraC Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 3 hours ago, Nipper1875 said: Well well the worm is wriggling around now and starting to come out in daylight - we have another jerome anderson here- beleive me now this season is going to be worse than the kean era - Gestede calling everything around the club thinks he is the main man Harry leonard questioning him with his approach to academy players and staff - he was ment to go bradford on loan instead gestede put feelers out to get him gone for questioning rudy - something whats learnt in the academy TO ASK QUESTIONS Jake batty another one - accrington stanley told a price for another loan season everything sorted then rudy get his nose poked in disagrees stops the deal and offers him out to other clubs at a different wage bracket cover 100% These academy lads arent getting the senior game time they need over rudy thinking about wages instead Pears disagreeing with gestede now been frozen right out the club Travis questioning things just like sonny is now booted out - Its beyond a dam joke that us supporters put up with this shite - its time for some balls make the enviroment horrible for him we look after our own remember he screwed the club as a player the shithead now he is trying to do the same Let’s not forget, it’s a case of him now making decisions, when he has previously been happy to force a move and announce, he was not in the right frame of mind to play for the club. 1 Quote
47er Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago On 03/09/2025 at 01:49, JBiz said: that’s what we should be judging him on, not indulging in rumours about making people cry or enforcing a long sleeve dress code for female staff; Can't believe you wrote that. Don't you think those things matter? If he bullies people, enforces his own moral code on them and shafts anyone who crosses him, don't you want to know? Wouldn't you include these matters when considering whether he is the right man? If what has been alleged is true he should be sacked on these grounds alone. We used to be a happy family club before these morons turned up. 6 Quote
Old Codger Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 10 hours ago, Tomphil2 said: No wonder he sneers from the shadows. I've said this previously. The rumour that this person takes around £500,000 per year out of the club and has done so for a considerable time, suggests he will fight tooth and nail to preserve his own cushy situation at the expense of others - even if that (paradoxically) will result in the end of the club. The only theory I can speculate that might make sense is that the Venksters have given him carte blanche to take the money for as long as he can keep the club going with little or no fresh input from them and with a remit to generate regular sales to chip away at the sunk costs (with payments going back to India as sweeteners), but that the long game is to allow it to fail in a way that doesn't alert the football authorities. Whatever the game is, it is a snidey little gobshite who is the executive instrument at the moment - someone IN THE PRESS, should be asking in a public forum, "What does Suhail Pasha Shaikh actually do at the club?' and "Why is he paid an obscene amount of money for so secretive a role?' Come on PRESS people. It's not rocket science 😉 Oh, and someone on the end of Gestede's petulance should give him a taste of his own medicine and show some balls when treated like shite. Cowards never like the spotlight, and neither do cockroaches.. VENKYS OUT! PASHA SHAIKH SHADOW LEECH OUT! RUDY GESTEDE BILLY BIG BALLS OUT! 8 Quote
Moderation Lead K-Hod Posted 12 hours ago Moderation Lead Posted 12 hours ago 11 hours ago, John said: Only read some snippets of exchanges between Gestede and fans - Gestede comes across like a smug / ignorant / arrogant **** or is it just me? Totally defensive on any criticism and in an attempt to justify decision making. Not a good look and seems petty. He's like that in person, tbh. 3 Quote
SIMON GARNERS 194 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, 47er said: Can't believe you wrote that. Don't you think those things matter? If he bullies people, enforces his own moral code on them and shafts anyone who crosses him, don't you want to know? Wouldn't you include these matters when considering whether he is the right man? If what has been alleged is true he should be sacked on these grounds alone. We used to be a happy family club before these morons turned up. Just simply not someone we want invovled with the running of our Club.He's zero prior experience at this level,still learning his trade and comes across as a loose Cannon..very divisive and dangerous. Quote
Tomphil2 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago He very much comes across a child in a sweet shop, a very small spoilt child whose been told he can eat what he wants and it doesn't matter if he eventually trashes the place and pukes everywhere because mummy and daddy will clean it up. Quote
lraC Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 3 hours ago, Old Codger said: I've said this previously. The rumour that this person takes around £500,000 per year out of the club and has done so for a considerable time, suggests he will fight tooth and nail to preserve his own cushy situation at the expense of others - even if that (paradoxically) will result in the end of the club. The only theory I can speculate that might make sense is that the Venksters have given him carte blanche to take the money for as long as he can keep the club going with little or no fresh input from them and with a remit to generate regular sales to chip away at the sunk costs (with payments going back to India as sweeteners), but that the long game is to allow it to fail in a way that doesn't alert the football authorities. Whatever the game is, it is a snidey little gobshite who is the executive instrument at the moment - someone IN THE PRESS, should be asking in a public forum, "What does Suhail Pasha Shaikh actually do at the club?' and "Why is he paid an obscene amount of money for so secretive a role?' Come on PRESS people. It's not rocket science 😉 Oh, and someone on the end of Gestede's petulance should give him a taste of his own medicine and show some balls when treated like shite. Cowards never like the spotlight, and neither do cockroaches.. VENKYS OUT! PASHA SHAIKH SHADOW LEECH OUT! RUDY GESTEDE BILLY BIG BALLS OUT! Full agree about both of these people, especially about the last line about cowardice. No doubting that people like him, are happy to threaten people who they consider to be inferior to them and go off crying, once they receive the proverbial punch on the nose. I despise bullies. Quote
Leonard Venkhater Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, 47er said: Can't believe you wrote that. Don't you think those things matter? If he bullies people, enforces his own moral code on them and shafts anyone who crosses him, don't you want to know? Wouldn't you include these matters when considering whether he is the right man? If what has been alleged is true he should be sacked on these grounds alone. We used to be a happy family club before these morons turned up. 100%.. And there is so much known about the negative impact of a bullying culture on morale, performance, staff retention-in particular, the impact on the motivation of an organisation's best staff.. I always felt that our positive culture/camaraderie etc was a key reason that the team managed to punch so far above its weight-particularly under Eustace. Now, not only has that been eroded, it seems to have been replaced by the polar opposite. So, do we think this more or less likely to help the team survive a very challenging season? Edited 9 hours ago by Leonard Venkhater 6 2 Quote
Rogerb Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Only a matter of time until someone takes on an appeal to an employment tribunal. Quote
lraC Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 47 minutes ago, Rogerb said: Only a matter of time until someone takes on an appeal to an employment tribunal. Let's face it we have seen that before and unless I am very much mistaken, Henning Berg and Derek Shaw, were both paid substantial amounts, having done so. Nice to know the club have learnt from their past mistakes though. 1 Quote
Exiled_Rover Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago On 02/09/2025 at 16:49, JBiz said: Bit of research on the question you pose. I agree massively with the last sentence that is in bold, and that’s what we should be judging him on, not indulging in rumours about making people cry or enforcing a long sleeve dress code for female staff; I'd like him to start wearing trousers long enough to cover his ankles - and to start wearing socks. Quote
Old Codger Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, lraC said: Let's face it we have seen that before and unless I am very much mistaken, Henning Berg and Derek Shaw, were both paid substantial amounts, having done so. Nice to know the club have learnt from their past mistakes though. Aye, but who IS the club in this context? We forget at our peril that the only constant since this whole nightmare began is the shadow-man, and he has shown time and time again complete contempt for others, disdain for due process and total ignorance of the law in this country as regards the treatment of employees. His one trick pony tactic is simply to put others between him and the full scrutiny of those who question what is going on at the club. He also knows that should he step into the light, for example in a 'fans forum' type meeting, he would be rapidly exposed for the rat that he is - which is why, of course, we never hear a peep from him, because he knows he is that close to being undone. We can see RG is a knob, and perhaps that is his role and his level of capability, so he is very easily supplanted. What would happen if Suhail Pasha Shaikh was held to account and removed from the picture? - well that is a very interesting question for which it is becoming high time we had an answer. SHADOW SHAIKH OUT! INTO THE LIGHT YOU CONNIVING COCKROACH ! 4 Quote
Leonard Venkhater Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, Exiled_Rover said: I'd like him to start wearing trousers long enough to cover his ankles - and to start wearing socks. ...and his head in a polythene bag... Quote
SIMON GARNERS 194 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 5 hours ago, Tomphil2 said: He very much comes across a child in a sweet shop, a very small spoilt child whose been told he can eat what he wants and it doesn't matter if he eventually trashes the place and pukes everywhere because mummy and daddy will clean it up. Yep,looks like the novice has been given Carte Blanche to do what he wants...so dangerous its untrue. We are on a hiding to nothing. Edited 6 hours ago by SIMON GARNERS 194 2 Quote
DeeCee Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago I now believe that Rudy is a bigger twat than Waggott. A remarkable achievement for Rudy. Quote
Tomphil2 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Imo Waggot was a bit dodgy in that classic slippery football suited kind of way and he himself was over promoted ending up as CEO here. However he had a set way of working and stuck to it and i think that has played a huge role in holding this club back and simply refusing to step up a gear or take the odd calculated gamble. That being said though he also kept it competitive, steady and in business whilst at least being an official challenger to the pillock in the shadows preventing him from doing everything as he pleased. So now i think we can wave goodbye to calm waters and hello to sink or swim, it'll either click and somehow work well or it'll go spectacularly wrong. 2 Quote
JBiz Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 5 hours ago, Exiled_Rover said: I'd like him to start wearing trousers long enough to cover his ankles - and to start wearing socks. If these comments to people are genuinely true and they have evidence - it shouldn’t be on here. It should be reported. Until it is reported and acted on, it’s online tittle tattle as far as I’m concerned. The fact it’s accusing someone of forcing religion on others is incredibly divisive too. Speculating on people’s religion too is also just not appropriate in my eyes, it’s got nothing to do with it. Quote
JBiz Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, DeeCee said: I now believe that Rudy is a bigger twat than Waggott. A remarkable achievement for Rudy. Nope. Remarkable example of how fickle some of our fans are. When Rudy has had 5 years to achieve little to nothing, been part of umpteen players to leave due to contract issues and overseen back to back winter transfer windows with deals falling down due to paperwork, I’ll join you on this comment. Quote
JHRover Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago It shouldn't be overlooked that Waggott, like Mowbray, had a direct connection to the Indians. This is of critical importance in the weird heirarchy and power struggle that we have witnessed here over the years. Now that the shadow dweller is the last man standing with that direct connection to India he has carte blanche to crack on with his agenda. A bit like in 2015 once Bowyer and Shaw had been ousted and he was able to play games with Lambert and Coyle beneath him. Mowbray's flight to India following relegation in 2017 interrupted that as Mowbray did what Mowbray does and won over those listening to him in Pune. Part of that meant they trusted him to recommend a CEO to do the upstairs work and along comes Waggott. Of course a total coincidence that they had worked at Coventry together just a few years previous. Waggott was also allowed to go out there with Mowbray and say his bit to those at the top table and off the back of it secured himself year after year of lucrative employment with probably little-no pressure from the Indians to actually deliver a great deal. I would be astonished if any of the top brass in India ever put him or Mowbray under any serious pressure in terms of performance, results, targets, growth, league status, attendances, facilities etc. Strikes me as something of a ghost ship here - once you are in and get the thumbs up from the Indians you are just left alone to coast along - pros and cons with that sort of routine - the downside being zero communication, direction etc to the point where you are literally your own boss and left to fend for yourself. Things start to unravel if you expect more or better of them or dare demand or criticise them - but as long as you are willing to put up with this upwards/reverse hierarchy you're laughing. That is until the shadow dweller reasserts himself and re-establishes control and then the party comes to an end. I would be fascinated to know the truth about who the shadow dweller truly acts for and represents because from where I'm sat there is a clear divergence between what he has been overseeing the last 10 years and what people like Mowbray, Waggott and Bowyer were up to with their direct connection to the bigwigs. Often we get 'the owners' chucked out there as a term for who is running the show and making the decisions but that is really quite unhelpful. Even if we accept that 'Venkys' are the only ones who are the owners of the club, we already know there are four in their inner sanctum all with likely different ways of operating, then there's their children, and other board members/hangers on/family members, advisors, finance people. Quite the tangled web. Like who is the other Rao bloke who is on the board who, allegedly, turned up for a game recently (how anyone knows what he looks like I don't know). 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.