Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, RevidgeBlue said:

I find it odd we won't consider Tyjon for selection because he won't sign a professional contract, yet we're happy to bring in a loan signing from another Club who we have absolutely no intention of signing permanently.

Fair point but Tyjon isn’t ready to step in the mess we’re in. Also, Rovers don’t want to lower Tyjon’s market value by telling it how it is. 

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, KentExile said:

I dont think anyone is hiding that

 

Its a silly new social media "trend" to do advance mock ups of new signings

Same poster saying Hedges out for 4 months 🥺

If true that's a lwb required as well as rwb and 2 strikers imo

Edited by Comfortably numb
  • Like 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

has experience of playing in a back 3, played at this level and was highly rated hence why he got his move to Brighton 

Has to be better than McLoughlin I suppose.

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Comfortably numb said:

Same poster saying Hedges out for 4 months 🥺

If true that's a lwb required as well as rwb and 2 strikers imo

I actually think Powell should be given a chance out there now if this about Hedges is correct.

Edited by MarkBRFC
  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, sharpysharps86 said:

Bit of a meh signing if true, so it probably is.

Is Cashin a better option at CB than anyone currently playing there for Rovers?

Well he got sold for £9million and Derby fans were disappointed, so I’d suspect that footballing judges thought he was better than McLaughlin and Miller, neither of whom I suspect would get in the Birmingham side either.

My concern is the more pressing problems are further up field.

Edited by Hasta
  • Fair point 1
Posted (edited)

If we've signed Cashin why's nothing on Rovers website?

Ismael indicated there may be an addition coming in after that awful game against Wrexham so why isn't Cashin in tomorrow's squad?

Edited by Cherry Blue
Posted
3 minutes ago, Cherry Blue said:

If we've signed Cashin why's nothing on Rovers website?

Ismael indicated there may be an addition coming in after that awful game against Wrexham so why isn't Cashin in tomorrow's squad?

It's only rumoured to have been agreed according to one twitter profile. Nixon also linked him but that's all.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Cherry Blue said:

If we've signed Cashin why's nothing on Rovers website?

Ismael indicated there may be an addition coming in after that awful game against Wrexham so why isn't Cashin in tomorrow's squad?

Its a post by someone on social media. may be true, may not be

But if it is true

1 - Its Saturday, signings need to be made by noon on Friday to play in the weekends games, so there is no rush 

2 - signings are not announced as soon as the happen, this hasn't been the case for years, the admin dept have to spend time taking silly pictures/videos/interviews for various social media sites

Posted
1 hour ago, chaddyrovers said:

think Cashin would be decent loan signing for us

You said you didnt want Gibson because he is left footed. That was the specific reason you gave.

Also, I am guessing you now agree that we definitely need a wing back on both sides.

  • Like 3
Posted
Just now, K-Hod said:

Nixon the other week saying we were keen on Gibson, now saying it’s very unlikely we do a deal? 🤣.

Why on earth anyone still listens to him is beyond me.

Said it for years.

Comes out with a load of rubbish - then reports it's still on track - then shock horror, move breaks down!

3 stories in one.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Whatever you think of Nixon, if it wasn't for him there wouldn't be a need for a transfer thread 😄.

He's the only one who at least gives us something to discuss , whether true or false

Edited by Comfortably numb
Posted
3 minutes ago, Comfortably numb said:

Whatever you think of Nixon, if it wasn't for him there wouldn't be a need for a transfer thread 😄.

He's the only one who at least gives us something to discuss , whether true or false

Tbf he does get one or two correct unlike Jackson who only ever confirms anything after it's happened.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

People still put what they think we need, who needs to go etc without Nixon. I wouldnt be building his already massive ego further.

Nobody's building his ego, certainly not me. 

Edited by Comfortably numb
Posted

Why don't we sell Tavares, Henrikkson and use some of that cash to sign JRC and John Buckley...  Two lads that bled blue and white and actually had a bit of something about them both..

  • Like 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, Bohinen1983 said:

Why don't we sell Tavares, Henrikkson and use some of that cash to sign JRC and John Buckley...  Two lads that bled blue and white and actually had a bit of something about them both..

because they are both shite and would`nt raise any money,you`de have to pay them out of their contracts to get shut of them,you can add the worst of the lot deneve to that list as well

  • Like 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, Bohinen1983 said:

Why don't we sell Tavares, Henrikkson and use some of that cash to sign JRC and John Buckley...  Two lads that bled blue and white and actually had a bit of something about them both..

 

1 minute ago, simongarnerisgod said:

because they are both shite and would`nt raise any money,you`de have to pay them out of their contracts to get shut of them,you can add the worst of the lot deneve to that list as well

and both JRC & Buckley are on a higher wage than Rovers are willing to pay these days

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...