Jimmy612 Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 And he didn't want to be here anymore. IMO I would guess there might be a few other players feeling the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Mercer Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 The decision to allow Diouf to go on loan to Rangers after being bullied by Warnock shows, IMO, just how inept Kean is. This is tantamount to a suicide note in our position. EHD has all the qualities we need RIGHT NOW, never mind Rochina or Formica. Is there a recall clause for this potential saviour ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
den Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 "Steve Kean revealed that, when he took over as Rovers manager, he told Diouf he wanted to give 20-year-old Junior Hoilett a run in the first-team. "Hence the reason why he went on loan to Rangers," Kean told BBC Scotland. "But he has one year left of his deal, so I don't know if Rangers will want to take up the last year of his contract." My link Strange then, that EHD was playing well and starting most games until Warnock got stuck into him. I mean, is Kean really saying that he told EHD that he could leave because he was going to play Hoilett instead? What if Hoilett had got injured, where would that have left him? and he's also saying EHD can stay at Rangers next season even though Junior hasn't signed a new contract yet and could well be sold. More lies methinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferrit Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Add that to the growing list of Keanisms. IE: Complete and utter rubbish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeChuck Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Kean keeps banging on about Hoilett like teams only play with one wide player. After Olsson we don't really have anyone else capable. Emerton couldn't play right wing five years ago, he's only got worse since then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercer Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Every time Kean opens his mouth, IMO, he digs deeper and deeper - again, IMO, the guy has no credibility whatsover, a complete joke. EHD can play right, left, through the centre and in the hole - as evidenced by his spells at Liverpool, Bolton and Rovers. As I've said before, flexibility, experience, passion and no shortgae of skill - sounds like a CV for a relegation fight to me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Can anyone really complain about moving Diouf on? The guy is on big wages, more than he deserves. He regularly brings to club into the headlines for the wrong reasons. He's a totally unlikeable character. His play is usually average at best. Complain about everything else, but moving Diouf on was good business. Hopefully we will be able to sell him in the summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
den Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Can anyone really complain about moving Diouf on? The guy is on big wages, more than he deserves. He regularly brings to club into the headlines for the wrong reasons. He's a totally unlikeable character. His play is usually average at best. Complain about everything else, but moving Diouf on was good business. Hopefully we will be able to sell him in the summer. He was playing well for us Eddie. In fact I would definitely say he would have been a big bonus for us over the last month or so. Please explain how it's been good business - in our current situation. You think there's been some kind of improvement in the results, or something? The point of the post though, was the lies/bull* again from the manager. In fact, IMO, he's made a bad decision and followed it up by lying about his reasons.. *Whichever you prefer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uddersfelt Blue Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Diouf was moved on because he didn't fit with the new image of the Club. There were certainly no football reasons to let him go when safety was not assured. BIG mistake IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebelmswar Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Diouf is tailor made for a relegation scrap. When he left our free kick for amount halved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Amazing. Kalinic, Andrews, Dunn and the like should all move on. Diouf was average during the first half of the season. ..and to clarify, by that I mean that they would instantly be held in high esteem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joey_big_nose Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Can anyone really complain about moving Diouf on? The guy is on big wages, more than he deserves. He regularly brings to club into the headlines for the wrong reasons. He's a totally unlikeable character. His play is usually average at best. Complain about everything else, but moving Diouf on was good business. Hopefully we will be able to sell him in the summer. No idea how you came up with that. Diouf had good patches and bad patches but even on balance he is probably our best performing attacking player bar Hoilett. Would Diouf been a better option wide than Mama Diouf against Blackpool? The answer to that is yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 ...but several other players would have been a better option. Better performing than Olsson? Hardly. Better performing than MGP? Not if you aren't in the group that counts every misplaced pass as more important than an assist. He's a decent premier league player, but he has never been anything more than that. The baggage that he brings is not outweighed by his quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
den Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Read the first two pages of this thread Eddie, up until he had the spat against QPR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 I don't really care what others may have said on this thread, my opinion on him has always been the same. He is a mediocre player. He suited the Allardyce system, but he has always been overpaid and overvalued. In an ideal world would he be good to have around the club as a substitute? Of course. Is he on the salary of a substitute? Not at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
den Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 We're also paying part of his wages according to the LT. We're in big danger of going down and we're doing things like this. Crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 It's not a popular opinion but.we've missed Diouf since he went out on loan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torgeir Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 We're also paying part of his wages according to the LT. We're in big danger of going down and we're doing things like this. Crazy. Say what!? I'd put him on the left instead of MGP every time. There are so many basic football decisions that have been made wrongly this season. I really hope Venky's put up the money in the summer regardless of PL status, but we desperately need to stay up - can't believe a veteran like Diouf gets shipped out in the manner he did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanLad Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 Diouff is made out as a awful, nasty swine in the press. He might be, I don't know, I've never met him. I can say that I think he's a cynical, cold hearted, arrogant/fearless, nasty(?) player. Those are the traits that you need is a relegation scrap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hughesy Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 No suprise we are paying part - he will be on £30k+ a week....Scottish clubs cannot afford big wages like that....not even half in most cases! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercer Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 It's not a popular opinion but.we've missed Diouf since he went out on loan. We've missed him enormously. Kean should have stuck two fingers up to the football world and said that he is our player and we are backing him. Kean might have just earned himself a bit more respect and credibility if he had done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
otto man Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 We've missed him enormously. Kean should have stuck two fingers up to the football world and said that he is our player and we are backing him. Kean might have just earned himself a bit more respect and credibility if he had done. Oh C'mon. Beat Kean with a stick when needed, but let's not forget that Spit came out and said he wanted away as he wasn't happy with the way Sam had been treated. He was also quoted as saying he didn't want to come back. This is just lynch mob mentality! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vintageadidas Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 Should we bring him back? Could he save our season? I think he could. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giant Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 Ej-Hadji's latest..... El-Hadji Diouf on Libya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A cup of beans Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 Should we bring him back? Could he save our season? I think he could. where would he play and instead of whom ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.