Backroom DE. Posted September 9, 2016 Backroom Share Posted September 9, 2016 I will cover this in detail in my blog when I get to that stage of it, I'd rather write the whole saga, than repeatedly answer the question on message boards tbh Glad you're still doing the blog. I thought from your post you might stop that, which would be a shame as it's very interesting and hugely important. It was 1-1 before the sub in question (Rochina for Gomes, 77mins). We scored a few minutes after and won 2-1. Glen > Kean http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/19304529 This is the match in question, I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
AggyBlue Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 The Rovers trust has the whole supporter database, So who gave the trust my details? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsonblue Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 So who gave the trust my details? Good point Aggy and surely permission should have been needed. I'm not a member of the Trust and won't ever be so why should they have my details? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABBEY Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 #venkysout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAFELL Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 Not one of the official group accounts have as of the last time I checked. I should be more specific. This story. http://b-a-b.uk/2cwVwNd This should be retweeted, put up on facebook and other social media sites - by every rovers supporter who use social media. I would like to hear a statement form all the groups involved as to why they have excluded Glen (Especially Wayne Wild - If I remember correctly at the time of the initial protests, he put up on twitter some posts that, shall we say, were not satisfactory to Rovers fans) Everyone of the leaders of the various groups needs to write a statement as to why they are excluding Glen Mullen a Rovers supporter. WAR is either an umbrella for all rovers supporters - or it is not. To exclude just one supporter would be wrong in itself. To exclude somebody who has worked hard to expose the situation at the club, is sheer madness. I have had my disagreements with Glen / brag over the years. But in one post from me, one reply from Glen - 'spat' dealt with, finished. Well, if my understanding is correct BRFCS is part of WAR - if so, I suggest we have a vote on this site as to, should Glen be included or not. If the vote goes in favour. Glen and Blackburn Ender have to find a way of ending whatever spat they have. then move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backroom Mike E Posted September 9, 2016 Backroom Share Posted September 9, 2016 The Rovers trust has the whole supporter database, I would ask, given all the documents were leaked to 2000 who emailed me, why they cannot be sent to the whole database, this surely makes sense? Getting information out is vital, if I had the database, they would already have it!!! This deserves support, but I would add a summary of how they fit together in the email. It took me a good few reads to understand what went where. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABBEY Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 It's a crystal by shame we should be hammering the turds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllRoverAsia Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 Maybe we should rename: IWAR - Internecine WAR Is it We Are Rovers or is it WeAreRovers ?? What is that s-hit WAR logo all about? Serious question. Can we have a protest that we havent had a protest yet...............OH and a poll.............about anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speedie Dived Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 The Rovers trust has the whole supporter database, I would ask, given all the documents were leaked to 2000 who emailed me, why they cannot be sent to the whole database, this surely makes sense? Getting information out is vital, if I had the database, they would already have it!!! No because that is breaking the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAFELL Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 Glen, I don't think Steve is actually talking about you when he's talking about a popular poster. Someone who was banned some time ago for very valid reasons spoke at the open meeting and wanted to be allowed back on the site. I was a mod when he was banned so I can completely understand why he wasn't allowed back. It's not all about you Glen I've not really commented much on this but my initial comment was that I didn't think there should be the creation of a new group and that the aim should be to unite all groups and get them working together. That seems to have been achieved and it's something that everyone has wanted for a long time. I can see why Glen's not involved at the moment as he's no longer involved with the 4 groups involved. If he was still involved in one of the groups he would be. However, and I know we've not always agreed on his approach, I believe that there will be a place and time where Glen is involved. My belief is that the groups working together need to recognise people outside of those groups who can contribute and make a difference. People like Madon, Glen and Kamy. It would be stupid to ignore what these people can offer. So if Glen, Kamy etc formed their own group - they would be part of WAR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speedie Dived Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 So if Glen, Kamy etc formed their own group - they would be part of WAR. No it's reps from the four largest supporter groups Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmb211087 Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 No it's reps from the four largest supporter groups Brfcs is not a supporters group though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J*B Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 No it's reps from the four largest supporter groups Ewood Blues can't have more than 50 members! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark1875 Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 I'll confirm here that Glens 'claim' is genuine. It was night game under the lights and it genuinely happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldjamfan1 Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 I'll confirm here that Glens 'claim' is genuine. It was night game under the lights and it genuinely happened. I'm fairly sure that Leicester game was a 3pm Saturday kick off (I was certainly there and am generally unable to make night games due to the distance). That's not to say the lights weren't on, though I seem to recall it being very early in the season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAFELL Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 No it's reps from the four largest supporter groups So if you are not in one of the 4 groups - you are not apart of WAR - would this be correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAFELL Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 Brfcs is not a supporters group though. I think this site should used as a forum for debate - NO matter if you are in a group or not. Issues with regards to Rovers are all discussed on here. Not everybody can get to various meetings. But can get to their computers etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllRoverAsia Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 This has become just a p-assing contest. Claim..................billicks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmb211087 Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 I think this site should used as a forum for debate - NO matter if you are in a group or not. Issues with regards to Rovers are all discussed on here. Not everybody can get to various meetings. But can get to their computers etc. Don't get me wrong I agree with you. He was saying WAR was made up of the 4 biggest supporters groups. Brfcs like you say is a forum for fans to discuss things. Ewood blues isn't that big. I can think of at least two other groups that are bigger that weren't included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adsfortheblues Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 I'm fairly sure that Leicester game was a 3pm Saturday kick off (I was certainly there and am generally unable to make night games due to the distance). That's not to say the lights weren't on, though I seem to recall it being very early in the season? It was, Pedersen scored I think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speedie Dived Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 This has become just a p-assing contest. Claim..................billicks!It hasn't. Glenn et Al and not happy is not at the top table, that's it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABBEY Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 Ewood Blues can't have more than 50 members! i was going to post the same....even the idiots on the facebook group have 7000 in numbers . So if you are not in one of the 4 groups - you are not apart of WAR - would this be correct? yup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MGAndy Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 Can we have a protest that we havent had a protest yet...............OH and a poll.............about anything. Bring back Majiball... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jock Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 Why are Ewood Blues at the top table? I thought they were backers of Venkys until very recently? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABBEY Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 and now you would think they had invented protesting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.