Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, joey_big_nose said:

Should get Sterling off, bring on Toney on to play in a two with Kane and drop Foden into central midfield.

Its so daft the 343. The wing backs can't get forward because they are crowded out by their own wide forwards.

Go 352 and everyone's a winner. We get an extra centre mid to compete. Kane gets a partner to help get the ball to stick, and the wing backs have the room to bomb on.

Toney not in 23

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mattyblue said:

Does it, how? How is this any different than just organising a friendly with Italy?

ย 

Because at least they are competitive. ย You forget how shite firendlies were when they passed around the back for 60 minutes and then changed 10 players.

Id rather not break up the football season for internationals, but if we do, this is far better than playing Costa Rica or Mali in a friendly. It also grounds the โ€˜hypeโ€™ that England are great.

Edited by Hasta
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Hasta said:

Because at least they are competitive. ย You forget how shite firendlies were when they passed around the back for 60 minutes and then changed 10 players.

Id rather not break up the football season for internationals, but if we do this is far better than playing Costa Rica or Mali in a friendly. It also grounds the โ€˜hypeโ€™ that England are great.

Not sure what Iโ€™m supposed to be seeing that makes it any different to if friendlies were just organised with teams like Italy or Germany. And as for subs, you can make just as many in these games.

UEFA can call them โ€˜competitiveโ€™ all they like and can provide a naff little trophy that is awarded after a convoluted set of games taking about 18 months, but as the players and managers themselves only see them as glorified friendlies, they simply arenโ€™t.

Edited by Mattyblue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mattyblue said:

Not sure what Iโ€™m supposed to be seeing that makes it any different to if friendlies were just organised with teams like Italy or Germany. And as for subs, you can make just as many in these games.

UEFA can call them โ€˜competitiveโ€™ all they like, but as the players and managers themselves only see them as glorified friendlies, they simply arenโ€™t.

You tell Hungary tonight that theyโ€™ve just won a few friendlies.ย 

You can tell they are more competitive than friendlies because we are getting rolled over in them.


How many subs have there been in this game so far? 12? 15? 18? Nope, just 5 for both teams combined. ย No team in any game in our group has made more than 5 subs in any match.

Edited by Hasta
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Friendlies are now also five. Plus, weโ€™ve lost plenty of friendlies away from home against teams like this.

If you think they are โ€˜competitiveโ€™ and mean something, fair enough. But in reality the whole โ€˜leagueโ€™ and who played who, who won it will all be forgotten by this time next year. Whilst the WC/Euros go into folklore. Thatโ€™s just the structure of international football, everything builds up to those tournaments, this means very, very little.

Edited by Mattyblue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody who thinks we have a smidgen of a chance at the World cup playing Southgate's defensive football need waking up.I rarely watch England in non tournament football these days but thought i'd give itย  a go tonight,didn't even make it to half time before i switched channels,turgid stuff from Gareth's boys.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Darrenbot said:

Anybody who thinks we have a smidgen of a chance at the World cup playing Southgate's defensive football need waking up.I rarely watch England in non tournament football these days but thought i'd give itย  a go tonight,didn't even make it to half time before i switched channels,turgid stuff from Gareth's boys.

We will make it to the quarters then get mullered against Franceย 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mattyblue said:

Friendlies are now also five. Plus, weโ€™ve lost plenty of friendlies away from home against teams like this.

If you think they are โ€˜competitiveโ€™ and mean something, fair enough. But in reality the whole โ€˜leagueโ€™ and who played who, who won it will all be forgotten by this time next year. Whilst the WC/Euros go into folklore. Thatโ€™s just the structure of international football.

Accepting that there is always going to be an international break, itโ€™s either this or friendlies. At least this gives us an indication of where England are rather than beating Paraguay at Wembley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hasta said:

Accepting that there is always going to be an international break, itโ€™s either this or friendlies. At least this gives us an indication of where England are rather than beating Paraguay at Wembley.

Just organise friendlies against top sides then, no? Which to be fair to the FA, they largely were doing in the couple of years before the NL was set up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
ร—
ร—
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.