Miller11 Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago (edited) 5 hours ago, Mattyblue said: ‘As far as he was aware David Lowe hadn’t left’. The longest standing first team coach at the club and he may still be clocking in to Brockhall, might not be. Best peer down from the Directors Box to the dug-out on Saturday to check. Some set-up this. In the FF meeting Suhail answered the initial question regarding Waggott with one word. It took a lot of probing around directorial responsibilities and EFL rules for him to admit that Waggott was still employed. He seemed very reluctant to do so. I don’t think Lowe being absent from Brockhall or Ewood will necessarily mean he isn’t being paid by Rovers. I expect that both he and Waggott will have very nice looking gardens at the end of the summer. Edited 17 hours ago by Miller11 Typo 6 Quote
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Tomphil2 Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago Then people will wonder why despite cutbacks the running costs don't come down. How many others are they still paying i wonder. Quote
... Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 5 hours ago, arbitro said: Send in the Clowns is my request especially the last line which goes 'well maybe they're here'. Moneys too tight to mention -simply red Quote
Tyrone Shoelaces Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 6 minutes ago, ... said: Moneys too tight to mention -simply red Err - The Valentine Brothers. Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 3 hours ago, Miller11 said: In the FF meeting Suhail answered the initial question regarding Waggott with one word. It took a lot of probing around directorial responsibilities and EFL rules for him to admit that Waggott was still employed. He seemed very reluctant to do so. I don’t think Lowe being absent from Brockhall or Ewood will necessarily mean he isn’t being paid by Rovers. I expect that both he and Waggott will have very nice looking gardens at the end of the summer. Mention of Waggott being "still employed" sends me into a cold sweat. Is it normal for employees who have been dispensed with but who are on gardening leave to be referred to in that way? I take it he doesn't actually do anything or wield any influence any longer? Quote
Ricky Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago If you’re on gardening leave you’re still technically employed. Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 39 minutes ago, Ricky said: If you’re on gardening leave you’re still technically employed. Ok thanks. Quote
Backroom Mike E Posted 11 hours ago Backroom Posted 11 hours ago I’m fairly sure Ian Holloway was once placed on gardening leave by a club, purely to prevent him going to a rival until the end of the season. Quote
Backroom Tom Posted 11 hours ago Backroom Posted 11 hours ago Yep speaking from a HR perspective if we put someone on gardening leave they are in effect being paid for working their notice but not needed in work, typically for an exec role that’s 6 months. An alternative is to pay PILON - Payment in Lieu of Notice and end employment immediately but that can have tax implications for the employee. As it will likely have been mutual consent I imagine the former was agreed Quote
lraC Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 9 hours ago, Herbie6590 said: They are… https://s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/gc-media-assets.gc.roversservices.co.uk/36515ad0-7437-11f0-a740-4f31ea861e61.pdf The link seems to be broken now. Is that coincidence or has someone do be this deliberately? Quote
Herbie6590 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 4 hours ago, lraC said: The link seems to be broken now. Is that coincidence or has someone do be this deliberately? Works for me…🤷♂️ 1 Quote
jodrell Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 4 hours ago, lraC said: The link seems to be broken now. Is that coincidence or has someone do be this deliberately? Still works for me 1 Quote
lraC Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, Herbie6590 said: Works for me…🤷♂️ Thanks Ian, Working again now. I think I am becoming paranoid about it all. 😞 1 Quote
Waggy76 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 13 hours ago, Tomphil2 said: Then people will wonder why despite cutbacks the running costs don't come down. How many others are they still paying i wonder. The names on the that list put in the public domain would probably bring an end to the Venky tenure ! 3 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.