Miller11 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 5 hours ago, Mattyblue said: ‘As far as he was aware David Lowe hadn’t left’. The longest standing first team coach at the club and he may still be clocking in to Brockhall, might not be. Best peer down from the Directors Box to the dug-out on Saturday to check. Some set-up this. In the FF meeting Suhail answered the initial question regarding Waggott with one word. It took a lot of probing around directorial responsibilities and EFL rules for him to admit that Waggott was still employed. He seemed very reluctant to do so. I don’t think Lowe being absent from Brockhall or Ewood will necessarily mean he isn’t being paid by Rovers. I expect that both he and Waggott will have very nice looking gardens at the end of the summer. Edited 4 hours ago by Miller11 Typo 4 Quote
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Tomphil2 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Then people will wonder why despite cutbacks the running costs don't come down. How many others are they still paying i wonder. Quote
... Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 5 hours ago, arbitro said: Send in the Clowns is my request especially the last line which goes 'well maybe they're here'. Moneys too tight to mention -simply red Quote
Tyrone Shoelaces Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 6 minutes ago, ... said: Moneys too tight to mention -simply red Err - The Valentine Brothers. Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, Miller11 said: In the FF meeting Suhail answered the initial question regarding Waggott with one word. It took a lot of probing around directorial responsibilities and EFL rules for him to admit that Waggott was still employed. He seemed very reluctant to do so. I don’t think Lowe being absent from Brockhall or Ewood will necessarily mean he isn’t being paid by Rovers. I expect that both he and Waggott will have very nice looking gardens at the end of the summer. Mention of Waggott being "still employed" sends me into a cold sweat. Is it normal for employees who have been dispensed with but who are on gardening leave to be referred to in that way? I take it he doesn't actually do anything or wield any influence any longer? Quote
Ricky Posted 58 minutes ago Posted 58 minutes ago If you’re on gardening leave you’re still technically employed. Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted 17 minutes ago Posted 17 minutes ago 39 minutes ago, Ricky said: If you’re on gardening leave you’re still technically employed. Ok thanks. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.