RevidgeBlue Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 We got £9million, plus a very likely £2million more, for a player, IMV, worth nowhere near that as evidenced by the fact that there was only one club in the queue at that price. I think Rhodes was a 'flat track' bully who scored goals for fun except where and when it really mattered. No real PL interest, no real recognition at international level, I think says it all. If M'boro go up, would be no surprised to see Rhodes loaned out / sold to a Championship club in Jan. 2017. That's all well and good but the 9m in Madame's back pocket does us no good at all. Only an idiot or someone who has painted themselves into a corner on the Rhodes issue over the years like den would argue that we are not immeasurably worse off having to rely on the likes of Jackson and Brown.
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
West Yorks Rover Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 Att; 19,538 (726 Rovers) not too bad considering our form lately, well done to all of them.
AllRoverAsia Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 This thread is sadly a reflection on how crap we are and today's game seems to be
G Somerset Rover Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 Att; 19,538 (726 Rovers) not too bad considering our form lately, well done to all of them. Be interesting to see our following numbers over the coming weeks with Browny and Jackson up top and a few dead rubbers to play.
Husky Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 Well there's that Josh King lad scoring again in the PL. Never good enough for the Championship... From BBC: GOAL - Aston Villa 0-2 BournemouthJoshua King (73 mins) Posted at17:31 Cute finish. Reminds of Michael Owen in his pomp.
Mercer Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 That's all well and good but the 9m in Madame's back pocket does us no good at all. Only an idiot or someone who has painted themselves into a corner on the Rhodes issue over the years like den would argue that we are not immeasurably worse off having to rely on the likes of Jackson and Brown. No one disputes that Rhodes is preferable over Jackson and Brown. The fact is, it would have been madness not to take a deal for a player of Rhodes' limited ability that very likely will realise £11million plus and save some £2.5million / season in wage and National Insurance costs. We are haemorrhaging money and without the Rhodes' deal who knows what our owners might have been tempted to do - they've already issued £1.4million in shares in mid Feb. to presumably keep us afloat.
Neal Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 Don't think SSN knows we're playing . If we don't give a @#/? then I doubt they'd waste time on it.
matt83 Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 If done well there's the cheer if done poorly there's the boo. What for this. The yawn. Terrible game. Two terrible sides. Terrible atmosphere. As I thought very enjoyable day up until 3. And will be from about 4.50. Why do we bother.
den Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 Really den? I know you hate him but you need to re-tune your abacus mate. Since we sold him we've scored 19 goals in 15 games. Prior to selling him we scored 14 goals in 15 games. Even more importantly, in the 17 games prior to selling him we won just 3. My abacus is fine.
Stuart Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 No one disputes that Rhodes is preferable over Jackson and Brown.No-one?
West Yorks Rover Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 Don't think SSN knows we're playing . BBC Final Score don't appear to have a reporter at the game today either, very unusual that, they usually do every game at this level.
booth Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 No one disputes that Rhodes is preferable over Jackson and Brown. The fact is, it would have been madness not to take a deal for a player of Rhodes' limited ability that very likely will realise £11million plus and save some £2.5million / season in wage and National Insurance costs. We are haemorrhaging money and without the Rhodes' deal who knows what our owners might have been tempted to do - they've already issued £1.4million in shares in mid Feb. to presumably keep us afloat. You'll see what madness is if Lambert leaves after selling our top goalscorer. Though it probably won't be madness it'll more likely just be a whimper then that's that.
den Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 Excellent result. Sounds like we could have won it in the end.
G Somerset Rover Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 Well...at least we didn't lose. 'Excellent' Den? It's obviously an alright result as I thought we'd lose but I wouldn't go that far.
West Yorks Rover Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 Seems like we nearly nicked it at the end. FT 0-0.
perthblue02 Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 11 men still on the pitch at full time and a point away from home ! progress
Moderation Lead K-Hod Posted April 9, 2016 Moderation Lead Posted April 9, 2016 We didn't lose and we kept 11 on the field, so it's an improvement from the last couple of weeks I guess...
RevidgeBlue Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 11 men still on the pitch at full time and a point away from home ! progress Shows how low expectations have plummeted under Lambert's watch when we're eulogising over a 0-0 draw away at a mediocre Wolves side.
Backroom Tom Posted April 9, 2016 Backroom Posted April 9, 2016 Sounds like a pitiful game but a good point and safety almost guaranteed Seems secondary to the bigger picture at the moment mind you
LewisF Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 How did Lowe play? And has Gomez improved on recent 'performances'?
Backroom Tom Posted April 9, 2016 Backroom Posted April 9, 2016 Shows how low expectations have plummeted under Lambert's watch when we're eulogising over a 0-0 draw away at a mediocre Wolves side. Let's not pretend they are lower than they were under Bowyer
Al Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 Before the match I wondered if we would win a match for the rest of the season. With Graham's injury I now wonder if we will score another goal.
den Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 Well...at least we didn't lose. 'Excellent' Den? It's obviously an alright result as I thought we'd lose but I wouldn't go that far. Losing Graham so early and following the last three games where we were down to ten men - I thought might have taken the fight out of them.
booth Posted April 9, 2016 Posted April 9, 2016 Shows how low expectations have plummeted under Lambert's watch when we're eulogising over a 0-0 draw away at a mediocre Wolves side. Lambert's watch? Expectations plummeted during the Kean reign of terror. We'll be at our natural level for some when we're playing on Witton Park.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.