Fans Forum/Roverstore/Commercial Chat

[glen9mullan]

3 minutes ago, GHD said:

You have written, very eloquently, exactly what I was about to post

I wish to cause no damage to any entity or fellow supporter.

On that basis

The Action Group will be issuing a statement today regarding the shenanigans , if other groups support or issue their own statement,  that's of course their perogative.

I can only act in the capacity I attended,  which was as Chair of the AG, and the words we will issue will be for the benefit of transparency to our members, 

[SIMON GARNERS 194]

12 minutes ago, glen9mullan said:

I can only act in the capacity I attended,  which was as Chair of the AG, and the words we will issue will be for the benefit of transparency to our members, 

..And that is all you can do Glen,transparency and honesty is all we ask for from these meetings.

If the Club dont like it then Tuff,the truth needs to be known.

[GHD]

14 minutes ago, glen9mullan said:

I wish to cause no damage to any entity or fellow supporter.

On that basis

The Action Group will be issuing a statement today regarding the shenanigans , if other groups support or issue their own statement,  that's of course their perogative.

I can only act in the capacity I attended,  which was as Chair of the AG, and the words we will issue will be for the benefit of transparency to our members, 

In agreeing with lraC’s comment re no confidence votes. I took it he was referring to club forum members and not fan members. Sorry if I got that wrong

[...]

56 minutes ago, MarkBRFC said:

I find it strange that the minutes aren't recorded.

Every meeting I have been in, in my professional life has been recorded for minute purposes.

That way, when the minutes are written up and are circulated to the relevant parties there can be nothing disputed.

Signed and agreed too

[lraC]

53 minutes ago, GHD said:

In agreeing with lraC’s comment re no confidence votes. I took it he was referring to club forum members and not fan members. Sorry if I got that wrong

I was

[lraC]

It is pretty clear from all of this, that it i a case of keeping the truth of the size unrest, away from the owners, for as long as possible, thus protecting certain individual in situ at Ewood Park.

I wasn't in attendance, however, unless I am very much mistaken, the reason for the confrontation was due to Pasha taking issue with Glen, having communication with the owners. That tells me, that Pasha is frightened of the owners, knowing what is really happening, thus protecting his position. 

Hopefully the statement being released today, gets to them too and we see the start of his demise, as it will be a significant removal, in my opinion, if that does happen. 

[SIMON GARNERS 194]

Glen's own words..

"My issue is the unprofessional outburst and aggressive nature of some of the club officials.

They went to a place where they lost total control of their emotions and lashed out stating things they now clearly regret." 

[arbitro]

11 minutes ago, SIMON GARNERS 194 said:

Glen's own words..

"My issue is the unprofessional outburst and aggressive nature of some of the club officials.

They went to a place where they lost total control of their emotions and lashed out stating things they now clearly regret." 

In a normal world apologies would generally be acceptable for this kind of behaviour but (if this is what happened) they are trying to pretend it didn't happen.

The absolute arrogance of them.

[Mattyblue]

End of the day why is this thread titled like it is? Because that’s generally been the remit of the FF.

The club have tried to manoeuvre the FF in to being the group that covers all consultation with the club, and they were getting away with it too. So all power to Glen et al for using their conniving and pathetic shenanigans against them.

[Mike Graham]

The Club has fooked up as a number of us predicted.  They did not like being held to account by WATR so they turned to the FF to tick their box of consultation thinking they would get their own way.

They were always going to get caught out with their pants down.  There are some decent, intelligent and forceful folk on the supporters side of the FF.

The latest score is:

Supporters 1 v Narcissists 0

(own goal)

Edited 1 hour ago by Mike Graham

[Hasta]

Off Topic a bit, but has "The Gooner' come off twitter?

 

 

[wilsdenrover]

3 hours ago, glen9mullan said:

I genuinely dont believe the club has any intention of having any other narrative than the one they wish to portray. The consistent view of "only a handful with an agenda" have any concerns is the line they are giving the media and its in their interest that the minutes show them in a positive light.

This is clearly the motive to not speaking to groups whilst also the motive why they continually ignore emails from groups notably WATR who have an MOU the club are now failing to honour 

Have they ever indicated what they think this agenda is?

[SIMON GARNERS 194]

That lot running our Club..

[Rogerb]

Suspect if the car salesman was still here the alleged confrontation would not have happened. Suspect another meeting will not occur until a new shield is in situ.