Backroom Mike E Posted January 16, 2021 Backroom Share Posted January 16, 2021 6 minutes ago, Gav said: We probably haven't spent £90m in our entire history I'd wager. Just sayin. Without googling I reckon we've spent about that this century. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Ewood Ace Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Gav said: We probably haven't spent £90m in our entire history I'd wager. Just sayin. That wasn't the question I asked and your wager would be spectacularly wrong. Edited January 16, 2021 by Ewood Ace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigdoggsteel Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Ewood Ace said: And how many of those players that £90 Million was spent on are still at Stoke? Not many I would wager. Well Clucas, Vokes and Ince cost a combined £20 million in transfer fees alone. Edited January 16, 2021 by Bigdoggsteel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewood Ace Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 1 minute ago, Bigdoggsteel said: Well Clucas, Vokes and Ince cost a combined £20 million in transfer fees alone. But none of those were signed by Hughes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J*B Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 7 minutes ago, Mike E said: Without googling I reckon we've spent about that this century. We’ve spent 90m since the 2008/2009 season - that season included. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaddyrovers Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 (edited) 31 minutes ago, Ewood Ace said: And how many of those players that £90 Million was spent on are still at Stoke? Not many I would wager. Stoke have spent roughly 65 million since coming down to the championship plus huge on wages aswell. Edited January 16, 2021 by chaddyrovers 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gav Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 (edited) 8 minutes ago, J*B said: We’ve spent 90m since the 2008/2009 season - that season included. That's criminal....but nowhere near Stokes budget by the way, Allen and Obi Mikel are on a fortune compared to us. Can you tell me how much we've spent since 1990? Or does it not go back that far? Edited January 16, 2021 by Gav Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roversfan99 Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 Many of those players signed were prior to O'Neill and rather than being of benefit to him, they are liabilities he is struggling to shift, Ince and Vokes amongst them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frosty Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 Allen was £13m according to a transfermarkt and a few other sources. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigdoggsteel Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 13 minutes ago, Ewood Ace said: But none of those were signed by Hughes. Ya, so they continued spending after Hughes. What wages would Mikel even be on? Allen? They blow us out of the water financially 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigdoggsteel Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 2 minutes ago, roversfan99 said: Many of those players signed were prior to O'Neill and rather than being of benefit to him, they are liabilities he is struggling to shift, Ince and Vokes amongst them. For a "liability" Ince is still there, starting games 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J*B Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 4 minutes ago, Gav said: That's criminal....but nowhere near Stokes budget by the way, Allen and Obi Mikel are on a fortune compared to us. Can you tell me how much we've spent since 1990? Or does it not go back that far? £311,935,000 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoochie Bloochie Mama Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 Rovers look into pitch concerns after Mowbray & player 'moaning' | Lancashire Telegraph “This pitch hasn’t been changed for 28 years and if we’re going to play a brand of football then we need a football pitch to play on and if we’re going to have a football pitch here then we need to have a pitch at the training ground that marries the pitch here so we can play on this surface and get used to it" - Mogga 28 years since they re-laid the pitch? Bullshit surely? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gav Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 (edited) 4 minutes ago, J*B said: £311,935,000 FUCKING HELL (Apologies K-Hod and the mods) Andy Cole is still our most expensive signing at £8m? Is that including wages 😪 I feel sick... Edited January 16, 2021 by Gav Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigdoggsteel Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 Just now, Hoochie Bloochie Mama said: Rovers look into pitch concerns after Mowbray & player 'moaning' | Lancashire Telegraph “This pitch hasn’t been changed for 28 years and if we’re going to play a brand of football then we need a football pitch to play on and if we’re going to have a football pitch here then we need to have a pitch at the training ground that marries the pitch here so we can play on this surface and get used to it" - Mogga 28 years since they re-laid the pitch? Bullshit surely? I found that extremely surprising. It's hardly the truth, is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewood Ace Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 6 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said: Stoke have spent roughly 65 million since coming down to the championship plus huge on wages aswell. And yet when O'Neill came in they were bottom of the league. The likes of Ince, Vokes, Afobe, Woods, Etebo, Lindsay who that money was spent have either been moved on rarely used as they weren't what O'Neill wanted. Yet by spending just £2 Million O'Neill has taken Stoke from bottom of the league to top 6 contenders. 14 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said: Allen cost 25 million. Close but it was £13 Million. Joe Allen: Stoke City sign Liverpool midfielder in £13m transfer - BBC Sport 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoochie Bloochie Mama Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 1 minute ago, Bigdoggsteel said: I found that extremely surprising. It's hardly the truth, is it? Its the only thing stopping us already being promoted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backroom DE. Posted January 16, 2021 Backroom Share Posted January 16, 2021 (edited) If Mowbray has a problem with the pitch has he raised it with Suhail or the owners? Or is he just passing the buck again? Also regarding his comments about Stoke... "It’s a football club with aspirations." Is he saying we aren't? Am sure the owners would appreciate his quotes after allowing him to chuck £12m on Gallagher & Brereton down the drain. Edited January 16, 2021 by DE. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt83 Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 I believe they relay the pitch at the end of every season. But the 28 years thing will be presumably referring to the whole system from under soil heating, to drainage, etc. Lets call it what it is though just another excuse out of Mowbray’s big book of ridiculous excuses Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewood Ace Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 11 minutes ago, Bigdoggsteel said: What wages would Mikel even be on? Allen? They blow us out of the water financially Speculation we have no idea what their wages are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J*B Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 6 minutes ago, Gav said: FUCKING HELL (Apologies K-Hod and the mods) Andy Cole is still out most expensive signing at £8m? Is that including wages 😪 Cole was 10.98m. That figure excludes wages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gav Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Ewood Ace said: Speculation we have no idea what their wages are. Much bigger than ours, Fletcher, Allen, Obi Mikel, Vokes and Ince. We're not in Stokes league really are we? Edited January 16, 2021 by Gav Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHRover Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 55 minutes ago, Hoochie Bloochie Mama said: TM: “We’re in the middle of winter and the pitch isn’t fine. It’s really, really poor. “So does the team and coach have to find a different way to play? Yeah, I think we’re at that stage." Great, roll on another 6 months whilst we try to change to this 'different way'. Maybe we need another couple of transfer windows to recruit the right personnel for this 'different way'. Always tomorrow, never today with this regime. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoversClitheroe Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 9 minutes ago, Hoochie Bloochie Mama said: Rovers look into pitch concerns after Mowbray & player 'moaning' | Lancashire Telegraph “This pitch hasn’t been changed for 28 years and if we’re going to play a brand of football then we need a football pitch to play on and if we’re going to have a football pitch here then we need to have a pitch at the training ground that marries the pitch here so we can play on this surface and get used to it" - Mogga 28 years since they re-laid the pitch? Bullshit surely? It's definitely not true, they relaid it like 3 seasons ago and posted it on twitter everyday if someone has the effort to go and search Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gav Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 (edited) 2 minutes ago, J*B said: Cole was 10.98m. That figure excludes wages. No chance, sorry J*B, thanks for putting it out there, but thats not true from the website you're looking at. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2001/dec/30/newsstory.sport1 £7.6M according to The Guardian. Edited January 16, 2021 by Gav Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.