Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Hasta said:

Referee on Saturday for not giving a penalty (which I don’t think it was) and for winking. 

The interviewer almost scoffed before he then put him further on the spot and said “despite that, did you see enough from your players”.

and the i is such an important letter

Posted

while i thought it was a penalty,there is no excuse for being humiliated by a side that plays extremely basic football and outhustles you,i thought it was very concerning tbh,if you don`t have the heart for a fight then you are in trouble

Posted
8 minutes ago, simongarnerisgod said:

while i thought it was a penalty,there is no excuse for being humiliated by a side that plays extremely basic football and outhustles you,i thought it was very concerning tbh,if you don`t have the heart for a fight then you are in trouble

Aye, chalk and cheese compared to the last couple of games.

Second to every ball at Charlton. Last thing you want though, when you're not playing well, is your keeper making a mess of his first attempted save. We were poor from 1 to 11. 

Posted
3 hours ago, lraC said:

Thanks for clarifying.

given this and the number of foreign players we have signed, I think he will play a vital role on getting these players settled and able to perform.

Its Ismael and coaching staff who are responsible for the players performance not the player liaison officer.  

3 hours ago, lraC said:

with regards to the head of commercial and partnerships, bringing in extra funds and fans, could be vital, especially in the January window, as a vital signing could be brought in or missed, dependent on his success.

Yet we already have money for January set in the kitty as Gestede confirmed in interview post transfer window

3 hours ago, lraC said:

Granted these two will not be a responsible as the other 3 especially the manager, but none the less, it is important that they perform their duties to the best they can.

Hope that answers the question.

 

Posted
35 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Yet we already have money for January set in the kitty as Gestede confirmed in interview post transfer window

There’s a couple of threads on here regarding fans forum minutes and the Lancashire Telegraph that clearly show that the club lie to save face. I know you try and avoid commenting so much on those, but I think we are certainly at the stage where only the most gullible believe what the club say. 

  • Like 5
Posted

I have been told that the first team didn't train until 15.30 yesterday which is almost unheard of particularly the day before a game.

The reason I am told is because Ismael flew to France immediately after the game at Charlton and didn't return until yesterday afternoon. This was to celebrate his 50th birthday.

If it is true I find it extremely surprising that he is allowed to change the routine so markedly so he can have a birthday bash.

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Torgeir said:

It's a late kickoff and they're professional footballers. 

You are missing the point.

Posted
48 minutes ago, arbitro said:

I have been told that the first team didn't train until 15.30 yesterday which is almost unheard of particularly the day before a game.

The reason I am told is because Ismael flew to France immediately after the game at Charlton and didn't return until yesterday afternoon. This was to celebrate his 50th birthday.

If it is true I find it extremely surprising that he is allowed to change the routine so markedly so he can have a birthday bash.

That is absolutely mental if true.

  • Like 2
Posted
47 minutes ago, arbitro said:

I have been told that the first team didn't train until 15.30 yesterday which is almost unheard of particularly the day before a game.

The reason I am told is because Ismael flew to France immediately after the game at Charlton and didn't return until yesterday afternoon. This was to celebrate his 50th birthday.

If it is true I find it extremely surprising that he is allowed to change the routine so markedly so he can have a birthday bash.

No surprise there to be honest.

The whole thing is just a jobs for the boys and no one is held to account.

I hope and pray that this spat with the telegraph, turns into something big and they start to expose some of the things, that need to be out in the open.

 

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, lraC said:

I hope and pray that this spat with the telegraph, turns into something big and they start to expose some of the things, that need to be out in the open.

 

Fingers crossed that at every press conference, at least one journo asks about Jackson/the LT to keep this issue current, and keeps as many eyes on the LT as possible in case this happens

Edited by KentExile
Posted

I was slowly warming to VI, we were playing decent mixed results which with a bit of luck could see us with two more victories.

After Charlton however I am back to.square one, I did not like him at all early doors.  He got. t wrong and was unable to correct it.  Subs made things worse, Tavares needs to stay away from 1st team for a while, could there be pressure to play him?  Surely VI sees what we do.  TGH looks better option for midfield doesn't he?

Posted
1 hour ago, KentExile said:

Fingers crossed that at every press conference, at least one journo asks about Jackson/the LT to keep this issue current, and keeps as many eyes on the LT as possible in case this happens

Apart from BBC radio Lancashire who else with be there? 

Posted
57 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Apart from BBC radio Lancashire who else with be there? 

Only takes one to ask, and if BBC get banned for asking a simple question then we get more eyes on us

Posted
1 hour ago, chaddyrovers said:

Apart from BBC radio Lancashire who else with be there? 

Perhaps this is their strategy.

Ban all the journos, then have a ready made excuse to ditch the press conferences altogether.

Posted

Yeah, why not, after ditching the EFL mandated supporters consultations they’ve also somehow managed to wrangle the FF down to just two meetings during the season.

So might as well get rid of pressers too as all the local journos are suddenly ‘not up to the club’s very high levels of professionalism’, nothing to do with wanting to avoid scrutiny, of course.

  • Like 2
Posted
34 minutes ago, KentExile said:

Only takes one to ask, and if BBC get banned for asking a simple question then we get more eyes on us

I would imagine its only Radio Lancs pre match there now until the issue get sort with the LT. 

This issue with LT and Elliott need sorting ASAP.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...