Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Herbie6590 said:

The 3.5 year contract was for the optics…”look at us, we’re backing this guy…he ain’t going anywhere so get used to him…”. It was a message to the players & the fans. 

I’d be amazed if that contract didn’t have fixed compensation clauses in it as opposed to “paying up the unexpired term”. But that said, if he is wiling to play the game, as was Kean, then realistically they won’t pot him as they’d then have to find another patsy. 

I’ve said it multiple times on here, as indeed have many others - this club isn’t about chasing on-field success. It’s about reducing costs. 

It could also contain a 'you won't get sacked if we are relegated in season one' and 'bonus for instant promotion from league 1' clause and bonus ...

  • Fair point 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Tomphil2 said:

It could also contain a 'you won't get sacked if we are relegated in season one' and 'bonus for instant promotion from league 1' clause and bonus ...

Instant promotion, won't happen under the French Oaf! 

I think he will be gone by February 1st.. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, Waggy76 said:

Instant promotion, won't happen under the French Oaf! 

I think he will be gone by February 1st.. 

Hopefully there is a modest mutual agreement amount signed into his contract otherwise he'll not be going anywhere even if he tries to get himself sacked.

Posted
2 hours ago, Tomphil2 said:

Hopefully there is a modest mutual agreement amount signed into his contract otherwise he'll not be going anywhere even if he tries to get himself sacked.

Unless he name checks Suhail in a post match rant of course.

  • Like 1
Posted
16 hours ago, Tomphil2 said:

I reckon the attempt to switch to an academy heavy model was a desperate move because of the money issues otherwise they'd have plodded on with TM or similar.

When that proved trickier than they thought with all the hassle with JDT and Broughton which will have ended up costing more anyway some bright spark (or shadow) then presented the sell everybody we can model. Reduce wages, replace with cheaper, pacify the agent involvement with a wad of commission then pray we stay up and grow these so called assets for a season or two.

Then repeat.

He just needed to get the right people in place first and get rid of all the opposition then install a cheap yes man with Championship experience and no relegation on his cv.

I was told that was Waggott, well before the end of Tomasson's first season.

Of course he could have been following orders.

It's still happening so it would appear so. I hear an ex manager is keen to take another of our homegrown players and it's likely to happen.

  • Like 1
Posted

Calling out fans, not a good look for him. Don’t know where any fans have abused Ismael or the players unless they’ve done it privately.

IMG_5419.jpeg

Posted
6 minutes ago, BRFC. said:

Calling out fans, not a good look for him. Don’t know where any fans have abused Ismael or the players unless they’ve done it privately.

IMG_5419.jpeg

Winning football matches would help.

  • Like 3
  • Moderation Lead
Posted

Redefining the word ‘abuse’ to suit an agenda, that old chestnut.

It’s football- if you lose you are criticised, don’t like it, maybe it’s not for you lad.

Criticism and abuse aren’t the same.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, BRFC. said:

Calling out fans, not a good look for him. Don’t know where any fans have abused Ismael or the players unless they’ve done it privately.

IMG_5419.jpeg

After listening to the full interview he was talking about football in general not just about Rovers. 

 

Posted
53 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

After listening to the full interview he was talking about football in general not just about Rovers. 

 

Yes, since Ismael is now showing such a heartfelt commitment to social issues, perhaps it’s about time he champions the importance of a free press.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Kjell said:

Yes, since Ismael is now showing such a heartfelt commitment to social issues, perhaps it’s about time he champions the importance of a free press.

Has he made the decision to banned them or is a higher up the food chain decision? 

1 minute ago, davulsukur said:

Yeah, tbf to the interviewer he asked for clarity.

Yes Andy Bayes from BBC Radio Lancs did 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...