Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'll summarise for you.  We had an awful start but the last 3 games have been more encouraging (despite the loss with 10 against Norwich). 

We'll know which direction we are heading with Ismael by the end of October.  

My expectations have been reduced by the player turnover so if we comfortably avoid relegation and a few new signings show promise, that will be a relative success. 

Still not sure what his brand of football is about though. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

I think today we saw what his previous club fans were saying. The guy can turn a poor performance into a worse one with his 60th minute subs.

I think every Rovers fan groaned when they saw Pickering on the team sheet.

Then on comes Tavares and Kargbo...

Posted
12 minutes ago, booth said:

I think today we saw what his previous club fans were saying. The guy can turn a poor performance into a worse one with his 60th minute subs.

I think every Rovers fan groaned when they saw Pickering on the team sheet.

Then on comes Tavares and Kargbo...

Just reflects the shite in this squad. 

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, Hasta said:

Win percentage now less than Owen Coyle.

But the club are more interested in sacking journalists.

I'm a bit indifferent about whether or not Ismael should be sacked at this point, I don't think it makes a huge difference in the grand scheme of things. I feel like we're circling the plughole very slowly. 

Edit -  I assume we wouldn't be able to afford to sack him.

Remember though, over 100 applicants and he was the best one, because surely we would only appoint the very best applicant.

Edited by StHelensRover
Posted

Not convinced by Ismael, but then again it doesn't matter who's in the dugout. Even when the club accidentally unearths a diamond in the rough, they eventually grow weary of the club's self-defeating business model and piss off to pastures new.

  • Like 2
  • Fair point 1
Posted
5 hours ago, booth said:

I think today we saw what his previous club fans were saying. The guy can turn a poor performance into a worse one with his 60th minute subs.

I think every Rovers fan groaned when they saw Pickering on the team sheet.

Then on comes Tavares and Kargbo...

 

The issue is Tavares and Kargbo are what has been provided through the "significant investment" of the owners.

Who is to blame if owners aren't funding serious wages, transfers and board members? The ambition comes from them.

We're in the middle of another spectacular downfall and it's on our absent owners every time.

  • Like 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, Ghost7 said:

 

The issue is Tavares and Kargbo are what has been provided through the "significant investment" of the owners.

Who is to blame if owners aren't funding serious wages, transfers and board members? The ambition comes from them.

We're in the middle of another spectacular downfall and it's on our absent owners every time.

Kargbo maybe but he didnt need to bring Tavares on. He had Montgomery or pulling Cantwell deeper into midfield. Or could have just left TGH there, moved Miller to RB and brought on McCloughlin.

The environment at the club makes things difficult but Ismael really shot us in the foot today.

Ive been pretty happy with how Ismael has set us up most games, we seem really well drilled. But if we go behind and need a way to find a goal he seems to have few ideas - which is consistent with how we have been for years.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...