Kit supplier and sponsor from 21/22

[DeeCee]

I'm couple blind chronically but can see the difference between blue and red shirts and black and white shorts. How hard can it be? 

 

[Riverside under the drip]

No shirts out yet but at least the shop has the retro shirts in proper sizes again (for those of us over-fond of a pie). ICI Perspex in at XL and XXL.

[chaddyrovers]

 

 

[Tom]

Meh it’s ok for a plain blue training top 

[SuperBrfc]

I used to buy the training tops regularly. That was until they started bringing them out in garish colours and the prices went a bit silly. I quite like this shade of blue though.

On another note, good to see Dack wearing the blue Predator Manias. When did they come back out? I used to be mad about the Predator Mania range back in the day. Think they went big around 2002-ish. My favourite boots to this day.

[rigger]

27 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

 

 

Was Nyambe there ?

[MarkBRFC]

I hope the sponsor on the actual kits is similar to the training wear, instead of a horrible black/blue box just stuck on there.

[rog of the rovers]

If Stoke City (fellow Macron) are to give us any clues.

We'll have a 'Walk out Jacket' very much like the training shirt, which also makes me think that the shade of blue will be used for the blue on the home shirt. Similarly, we may have an away 'Walk out Jacket' in the change strip colour scheme. Also, interesting that we've used a full colour badge, instead of the monochrome badge on the Stoke shirts.

Finally a clue to our goalkeeper kits? Pastiles anyone?

 

Edited June 13, 2022 by rog of the rovers

[Cuppliance]

2 hours ago, MarkBRFC said:

I hope the sponsor on the actual kits is similar to the training wear, instead of a horrible black/blue box just stuck on there.

Yeah that’s what I was going to say. I think there is a good chance the sponsor will be like that as I think the sponsor last season had to be the way it was to cover the up the recoverite logo. 

[had.e.nuff]

7 hours ago, rigger said:

Was Nyambe there ?

because he is under contract until 30 june

[J*B]

On 13/06/2022 at 16:44, rog of the rovers said:

If Stoke City (fellow Macron) are to give us any clues.

We'll have a 'Walk out Jacket' very much like the training shirt, which also makes me think that the shade of blue will be used for the blue on the home shirt. Similarly, we may have an away 'Walk out Jacket' in the change strip colour scheme. Also, interesting that we've used a full colour badge, instead of the monochrome badge on the Stoke shirts.

Finally a clue to our goalkeeper kits? Pastiles anyone?

 

I’ll give you absolutes rather than clues, if you’d like? 

Home - same as always, still quarters rather than halves

Away - navy blue

3rd - red with Lancashire rose outlines

[chaddyrovers]

34 minutes ago, J*B said:

I’ll give you absolutes rather than clues, if you’d like? 

Home - same as always, still quarters rather than halves

Away - navy blue

3rd - red with Lancashire rose outlines

Look forward to seeing these kits. 

Would have prefer this has our away kit. Smart this https://scontent-lcy1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/287890002_5414252972008068_1324280288104701362_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=5cd70e&_nc_ohc=z1vhVXvXh4kAX9MeH-6&_nc_ht=scontent-lcy1-1.xx&oh=00_AT-oerVu8s90_-0jkXNWrgMHXoKCPdi48Zrk8oPyXTXXhg&oe=62B003F3

[Herbie6590]

 

[MarkBRFC]

20 hours ago, J*B said:

I’ll give you absolutes rather than clues, if you’d like? 

Home - same as always, still quarters rather than halves

Away - navy blue

3rd - red with Lancashire rose outlines

They were halves last season, do you mean its back to quarters this season or is still halves?

[J*B]

18 minutes ago, MarkBRFC said:

They were halves last season, do you mean its back to quarters this season or is still halves?

Less sure on this than the colours - but I believe it was halves, is now quarters. 

[MarkBRFC]

19 minutes ago, J*B said:

Less sure on this than the colours - but I believe it was halves, is now quarters. 

Hope so, i'm a sucker for the quarters tradition.

[alex l]

this will be why the club shop ran out of stock on lettering towards the end of the season - change to the font for the coming season

EFL's Terrible Kit Font Is History - Footy Headlines

[IrelandsRover]

On 01/06/2022 at 10:08, RTM08 said:

Awful decision for me that screams "we can't attract a decent sponsor".

Even without the moral implications the logo is hideous and likely to ruin any shirts we get.

Agree fully with everything you said here 

another season I won’t be picking up the kit 

[nbdrovers]

1 hour ago, IrelandsRover said:

Agree fully with everything you said here 

another season I won’t be picking up the kit 

same here. was gutted about the recoverite debacle. didn't have the pennies for one first half of last season and by the time i did they were forced to have that monstrosity slapped across them, and i don't just mean the big blue cover-up box. a shame, the home and third kit were the first of our kits i've truly liked since the league one season.

i did quite like that lighter blue number we had first season back up actually, far more than most seemed to, but that awful betting logo ruined it. it baffles me the club can't sell some sponsorless shirts when we're linked with such businesses. obviously no thought even given to the various religious communities that don't agree with gambling etc? essentially cutting out a huge chunk of their market right off the bat? mind-boggling.

[DeeCee]

baffles me the club can't sell some sponsorless shirts 

It will be in the contract, maybe not for child's shirts?

[IrelandsRover]

2 hours ago, nbdelboy said:

same here. was gutted about the recoverite debacle. didn't have the pennies for one first half of last season and by the time i did they were forced to have that monstrosity slapped across them, and i don't just mean the big blue cover-up box. a shame, the home and third kit were the first of our kits i've truly liked since the league one season.

i did quite like that lighter blue number we had first season back up actually, far more than most seemed to, but that awful betting logo ruined it. it baffles me the club can't sell some sponsorless shirts when we're linked with such businesses. obviously no thought even given to the various religious communities that don't agree with gambling etc? essentially cutting out a huge chunk of their market right off the bat? mind-boggling.

Yes this is why I cannot wear the shirt

i am not going to sport that logo 

[alex l]

10 hours ago, DeeCee said:

baffles me the club can't sell some sponsorless shirts 

It will be in the contract, maybe not for child's shirts?

A company isn't going to want to pay sponsorship for their logo not to be on the prime position. Any time a crowd shot or picture is shown, it's potentially dozens of ads for your brand. The sale of a few hundred more shirts wouldn't likely make up the difference in lost or reduced sponsorship funds if we went with no sponsor or negotiated to not have them on replica shirts. 

[Upside Down]

I'd rather go without the money than be complicit in advertising nicotine products to children.

But hey, that's the price of having values I suppose. 

[AspRover]

Could the league/fa/whomever just give an ffp break of whatever the average shirt sponsor deal is to clubs that have non gambling/booze/tobacco sponsorship? Maybe a bit more for a charity?

[DeeCee]

4 hours ago, alex l said:

A company isn't going to want to pay sponsorship for their logo not to be on the prime position. Any time a crowd shot or picture is shown, it's potentially dozens of ads for your brand. The sale of a few hundred more shirts wouldn't likely make up the difference in lost or reduced sponsorship funds if we went with no sponsor or negotiated to not have them on replica shirts. 

I agree, I was quoting and replying to another poster